Xylocaine to Freeze During Unpleasant Nasopharyngeal Swabs
Xylofuns
1 other identifier
interventional
88
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) have been recommended to detect the virus. This procedure has been reported to be painful by 85% of children The aim of the study was to assess whether pretreatment with topical lidocaine reduces the discomfort experienced by children during a nasopharyngeal swab. This was a RCT among children aged 8-17 years old who need a NPS. The primary outcome was pain intensity as measured by the Visual Analog Scale .
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2 covid19
Started May 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_2 covid19
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 7, 2021
CompletedSeptember 27, 2021
September 1, 2021
27 days
May 14, 2021
September 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain during the procedure
Self-reported pain immediately after the NPS as measured using a validated self-reported pain scale: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS
During procedure
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Anxiety during the procedure
During procedure
Discomfort
During procedure
Pain 2 NRS
During procedure
Number of patients with physical restriction
During procedure
Utility according to nurses
During procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Xylocaine
EXPERIMENTALThe study intervention was the administration of 10 mg of intranasal lidocaine in one nostril using 1 spray of 0.1mL of a 10% lidocaine solution 5 minutes before NPS. This was done using the standard long nozzle.
Control
SHAM COMPARATORThe control group received the placebo with the same application technique using an empty bottle of lidocaine 10% with the same long nozzle for delivery.
Interventions
The study intervention was the administration of 10 mg of intranasal lidocaine in one nostril using 1 spray of 0.1mL of a 10% lidocaine solution 5 minutes before NPS. This was done using the standard long nozzle
The control group received the placebo with the same application technique using an empty bottle of lidocaine 10% with the same long nozzle for delivery
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old inclusively
- Children for whom a NPS was ordered
You may not qualify if:
- Children presenting with the following acute conditions, which could either prevent the lidocaine from being properly administered, or pose a risk for the patient as increased absorption of the medication might occur:
- Nasal or airway burns, trauma or major anomaly
- Cardiorespiratory compromise
- Children for whom an informed consent could not be obtained
- Any other life-threatening condition or priority one patient requiring emergency support
- Language barrier
- Children presenting with conditions that could prevent their ability to reliably report their pain:
- Severe intellectual disability
- Severe pain upon presentation
- Administration of opiates prior to the NPS
- Children presenting with the following chronic conditions, which could either prevent the lidocaine from being properly administered, or pose a risk for the patient:
- Hypersensitivity/allergy to the medication or a known component
- Methemoglobinemia
- G6PD deficiency
- Familial malignant hyperthermia
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Evelyne D Trottier
Montreal, Quebec, H3T1C5, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The research assistant enrolling the patients was blinded to treatment assignment because he did not know to which bottle the patient was randomized (A or B) and he did not know what was contained in the bottle
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2021
First Posted
May 25, 2021
Study Start
May 11, 2021
Primary Completion
June 7, 2021
Study Completion
June 7, 2021
Last Updated
September 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share