Intraoperative Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Cancer
EchoSurg
Prospective Study of Preoperative Diagnostic Endoscopy for the Diagnosis of Occult Metastatic Lesions of Operable Pancreatic Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Nowadays pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest oncological pathologies. The only effective curative tool is the surgery. Before the intervention, an endoscopic ultrasound is performed on the patient to carry out the biopsy of the main tumor. In this study, the echoendoscopie will be extended to lymph node staging away from the surgical field in order to implement a simple classification of lymph nodes, based on non-invasive ultrasound criteria. This would facilitate the location and qualification of peripancreatic lymph nodes and distant from the tumor, and therefore the staging of the tumor.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
Started Dec 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 4, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 12, 2025
CompletedApril 17, 2026
April 1, 2026
3.5 years
May 21, 2021
April 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of lymph nodes correctly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy. (Sensitivity)
Number of lymph nodes correctly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).
1 month
Rate of lymph nodes wrongly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy. (Specificity)
Number of lymph nodes wrongly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).
1 month
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Rate of metastases actually diagnosed
1 month
Location of hidden lymph node metastases
1 day
Number of distant nodes detected during the endoscopic ultrasound
1 day
Number of distant malignant lymph nodes
1 month
Rate of patients for whom contraindications for surgery has been detected during the endoscopic ultrasound
1 day
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Peripancreatic and distant lymph node assessment
EXPERIMENTALAll patients programmed for an endoscopic ultrasound in the context of a pancreatic cancer
Interventions
Peripancreatic lymph nodes and at a distance from the pancreas assessment by endoscopic ultrasound, elastography an doppler to record their anatomical location and characteristics. All lymph nodes suspected of metastatic disease will be marked with sterile black ink.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient over 18 years old
- Patient with a solid or degenerated cystic tumor of the pancreas requiring curative surgery
- Patient with a complete clinical examination performed
- Patient with no contraindication to anesthesia, upper digestive endoscopy and pancreatic surgery
- Patient able to receive and understand information relating to the study and give informed written consent
- Patient affiliated to the French social security system
You may not qualify if:
- Patient presenting with bleeding disease with disorder hemostasis and coagulation (PT \<60%, TCA\> 40 s and platelets \<60,000 / mm3)
- Patient on anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment that cannot be temporarily interrupted
- Patient carrying a right-left shunt, a severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (high blood pressure pulmonary\> 90 mm Hg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension or suffering from respiratory distress syndrome.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
- Patient under legal protection
- Patient under guardianship or trusteeship
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- IHU Strasbourglead
Study Sites (1)
Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne
Strasbourg, 67000, France
Related Publications (10)
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
PMID: 23335087BACKGROUNDKleeff J, Reiser C, Hinz U, Bachmann J, Debus J, Jaeger D, Friess H, Buchler MW. Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245845.06772.7d.
PMID: 17414605BACKGROUNDPoruk KE, Firpo MA, Adler DG, Mulvihill SJ. Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who? Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffbfb.
PMID: 22895395BACKGROUNDButturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl JH, Bakkevold KE, Takada T, Amano H, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP; Pancreatic Cancer Meta-Analysis Group. Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):75-83; discussion 83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.17.
PMID: 18209156BACKGROUNDGalasso D, Carnuccio A, Larghi A. Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and endoscopic staging. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):375-85.
PMID: 20496552BACKGROUNDAl-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, Raimondo M. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):204-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995336. Epub 2007 Dec 4.
PMID: 18058615BACKGROUNDBhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jun;45(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70176-7.
PMID: 9199903BACKGROUNDKanamori A, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Hashimoto S, Kawashima H, Hara K, Uchida H, Goto J, Ohmiya N, Niwa Y, Goto H. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;101(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00394.x.
PMID: 16405532BACKGROUNDGiovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan B, Christian P, Fabrice C, Benjamin E, Genevieve M, Paolo A, Pierre D, Robert Y, Walter S, Hanz S, Carl S, Christoph D, Pierre E, Jean-Luc VL, Jacques D, Peter V, Andrian S. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 7;15(13):1587-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1587.
PMID: 19340900BACKGROUNDNawaz H, Fan CY, Kloke J, Khalid A, McGrath K, Landsittel D, Papachristou GI. Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. JOP. 2013 Sep 10;14(5):484-97. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/1512.
PMID: 24018593BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick Pessaux, MD
Unité de Chirurgie Hépato-biliaire et Pancréatique, NHC Strasbourg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 21, 2021
First Posted
May 24, 2021
Study Start
December 5, 2021
Primary Completion
June 4, 2025
Study Completion
November 12, 2025
Last Updated
April 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share