NCT04899739

Brief Summary

Nowadays pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest oncological pathologies. The only effective curative tool is the surgery. Before the intervention, an endoscopic ultrasound is performed on the patient to carry out the biopsy of the main tumor. In this study, the echoendoscopie will be extended to lymph node staging away from the surgical field in order to implement a simple classification of lymph nodes, based on non-invasive ultrasound criteria. This would facilitate the location and qualification of peripancreatic lymph nodes and distant from the tumor, and therefore the staging of the tumor.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
33

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable pancreatic-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 21, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 24, 2021

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 5, 2021

Completed
3.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 4, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 17, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

May 21, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

EUSEndoscopic UltrasoundBiopsyPancreatic surgeryPancreatic CancerArtificial intelligence

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of lymph nodes correctly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy. (Sensitivity)

    Number of lymph nodes correctly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).

    1 month

  • Rate of lymph nodes wrongly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy. (Specificity)

    Number of lymph nodes wrongly categorised by ultrasound endoscopy compared to the gold standard (anatomopathology).

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Rate of metastases actually diagnosed

    1 month

  • Location of hidden lymph node metastases

    1 day

  • Number of distant nodes detected during the endoscopic ultrasound

    1 day

  • Number of distant malignant lymph nodes

    1 month

  • Rate of patients for whom contraindications for surgery has been detected during the endoscopic ultrasound

    1 day

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Peripancreatic and distant lymph node assessment

EXPERIMENTAL

All patients programmed for an endoscopic ultrasound in the context of a pancreatic cancer

Diagnostic Test: Echoendoscopy

Interventions

EchoendoscopyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Peripancreatic lymph nodes and at a distance from the pancreas assessment by endoscopic ultrasound, elastography an doppler to record their anatomical location and characteristics. All lymph nodes suspected of metastatic disease will be marked with sterile black ink.

Peripancreatic and distant lymph node assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 95 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient over 18 years old
  • Patient with a solid or degenerated cystic tumor of the pancreas requiring curative surgery
  • Patient with a complete clinical examination performed
  • Patient with no contraindication to anesthesia, upper digestive endoscopy and pancreatic surgery
  • Patient able to receive and understand information relating to the study and give informed written consent
  • Patient affiliated to the French social security system

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient presenting with bleeding disease with disorder hemostasis and coagulation (PT \<60%, TCA\> 40 s and platelets \<60,000 / mm3)
  • Patient on anticoagulant or antiaggregant treatment that cannot be temporarily interrupted
  • Patient carrying a right-left shunt, a severe pulmonary arterial hypertension (high blood pressure pulmonary\> 90 mm Hg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension or suffering from respiratory distress syndrome.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Patient under guardianship or trusteeship

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne

Strasbourg, 67000, France

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013 Jan;63(1):11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. Epub 2013 Jan 17.

    PMID: 23335087BACKGROUND
  • Kleeff J, Reiser C, Hinz U, Bachmann J, Debus J, Jaeger D, Friess H, Buchler MW. Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):566-72. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245845.06772.7d.

    PMID: 17414605BACKGROUND
  • Poruk KE, Firpo MA, Adler DG, Mulvihill SJ. Screening for pancreatic cancer: why, how, and who? Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):17-26. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825ffbfb.

    PMID: 22895395BACKGROUND
  • Butturini G, Stocken DD, Wente MN, Jeekel H, Klinkenbijl JH, Bakkevold KE, Takada T, Amano H, Dervenis C, Bassi C, Buchler MW, Neoptolemos JP; Pancreatic Cancer Meta-Analysis Group. Influence of resection margins and treatment on survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):75-83; discussion 83. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2007.17.

    PMID: 18209156BACKGROUND
  • Galasso D, Carnuccio A, Larghi A. Pancreatic cancer: diagnosis and endoscopic staging. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):375-85.

    PMID: 20496552BACKGROUND
  • Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Gross SA, Hodgens CM, Toton RD, Raimondo M. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008 Mar;40(3):204-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995336. Epub 2007 Dec 4.

    PMID: 18058615BACKGROUND
  • Bhutani MS, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. A comparison of the accuracy of echo features during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of malignant lymph node invasion. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997 Jun;45(6):474-9. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70176-7.

    PMID: 9199903BACKGROUND
  • Kanamori A, Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Hashimoto S, Kawashima H, Hara K, Uchida H, Goto J, Ohmiya N, Niwa Y, Goto H. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the differentiation between malignant and benign lymphadenopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;101(1):45-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00394.x.

    PMID: 16405532BACKGROUND
  • Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan B, Christian P, Fabrice C, Benjamin E, Genevieve M, Paolo A, Pierre D, Robert Y, Walter S, Hanz S, Carl S, Christoph D, Pierre E, Jean-Luc VL, Jacques D, Peter V, Andrian S. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr 7;15(13):1587-93. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1587.

    PMID: 19340900BACKGROUND
  • Nawaz H, Fan CY, Kloke J, Khalid A, McGrath K, Landsittel D, Papachristou GI. Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. JOP. 2013 Sep 10;14(5):484-97. doi: 10.6092/1590-8577/1512.

    PMID: 24018593BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pancreatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Digestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesPancreatic DiseasesEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Patrick Pessaux, MD

    Unité de Chirurgie Hépato-biliaire et Pancréatique, NHC Strasbourg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2021

First Posted

May 24, 2021

Study Start

December 5, 2021

Primary Completion

June 4, 2025

Study Completion

November 12, 2025

Last Updated

April 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations