Repetition Prescription Approaches Delivered Via Videoconferencing
A Comparison Between Two Repetition Prescription Approaches in Resistance Training Delivered Via Videoconferencing to Untrained Young Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
58
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized controlled trial comparing between two approaches of prescribing repetition-numbers in resistance training (RT) sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes. Sixty healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) will be randomly allocated to either the "predetermined" or "self-selected" groups. The groups will differ in the amount of choice they will be able to make concerning the resistance of each exercise and the number of repetitions they complete (see detailed description). Both groups will complete two sessions per week composed of body weight and resistance band exercises, lasting 45 minutes for eight weeks. The sessions will be delivered live by a certified instructor using a videoconferencing platform. The primary aim of this study is: Compare between the "predetermined" and the "self-selected" repetition prescription approaches on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes in a cohort of 60 healthy and sedentary adults (age range: 18-45) over an eight-week period of live, videoconferencing RT sessions. The secondary aim is: Determine the influence of live, videoconferencing group RT sessions on psychological, physiological, and performance outcomes across groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 10, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 10, 2021
CompletedAugust 13, 2021
August 1, 2021
3 months
May 9, 2021
August 12, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline enjoyment score
Participants will respond to a bi-monthly survey introducing the question: "how much did you enjoy the previous four sessions?" using a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from (-100) (i.e., did not enjoy it at all) to 100 (i.e., enjoyed it very much). First, the change in scores from one time point the previous one will be calculated, resulting in three change scores across the duration of the study (e.g., week 4 minus week 2, week 6 minus week 4, etc.). Then, the three change scores will be averaged per group and compared between groups as the main outcome.
Change from week two to week four, week six and the end of the program on week eight.
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Adherence proportion
Through study completion, a period of eight weeks.
Change in fat free mass (FFM)
Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in body mass index (BMI)
Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in maximal strength:
Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
Change in hand-grip strength:
Change from baseline to the end of intervention at eight weeks.
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Self-selected
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the "self-selected" arm will choose the initial resistance in view of their preferences, and complete as many repetitions as they wish in order to reach the target rating of perceived exertion RPE of 7/10
Predetermined
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in the "predetermined" arm will be instructed to complete ten repetitions per set and exercise, while aiming to reach a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) of 7/10 by the 10th repetition. This means that participants will need to select and adjust the resistance of each exercise (e.g., band's resistance) to achieve this goal.
Interventions
Providing trainees with choices regarding the load and the number of repetitions to be performed per set and exercise
Trainees predetermine the load and perform ten repetitions per set and exercise
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy
- Non-active (characterized by 60 minutes or less per week of formal exercise sessions)
- Ages of 18-45
- Did not participate in RT in the past six months.
- Participants will be asked to fill out a health questionnaire. If they marked any of the items on the health questionnaire as positive (e.g., diabetes) they were asked to provide a medical clearance from a doctor.
- Signing a health declaration to participate in physical activity according to the government regulations
You may not qualify if:
- Orthopedic or neurological conditions
- Diagnosis of co-morbidities
- Routine use of prescription medication
- Pregnancy
- Less than six months after childbirth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tel Aviv Universitylead
- Israel Science Foundationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Tel Aviv University
Tel Aviv, 69978, Israel
Related Publications (4)
Schwartz H, Har-Nir I, Wenhoda T, Halperin I. Staying physically active during the COVID-19 quarantine: exploring the feasibility of live, online, group training sessions among older adults. Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):314-322. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa141.
PMID: 33447852BACKGROUNDPatall EA, Cooper H, Robinson JC. The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: a meta-analysis of research findings. Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;134(2):270-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270.
PMID: 18298272BACKGROUNDLopes JSS, Machado AF, Micheletti JK, de Almeida AC, Cavina AP, Pastre CM. Effects of training with elastic resistance versus conventional resistance on muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Feb 19;7:2050312119831116. doi: 10.1177/2050312119831116. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30815258BACKGROUNDEmanuel A, Har-Nir I, Rozen Smukas II, Halperin I. The effect of self-selecting the number of repetitions on motor performance and psychological outcomes. Psychol Res. 2021 Sep;85(6):2398-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01402-4. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
PMID: 32778961BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Israel Halperin, PhD
Tel Aviv University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will be blinded to allocation
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior faculty member
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2021
First Posted
May 20, 2021
Study Start
May 23, 2021
Primary Completion
August 10, 2021
Study Completion
August 10, 2021
Last Updated
August 13, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08