Orthotics, Pain & Fear of Falling
A Randomised Control Trial Comparing Prefabricated Orthotics With and Without Metatarsal Pad in Decreasing Pain and Fear of Falling in Older Adults
1 other identifier
interventional
206
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To investigate and compare the use of a prefabricated Orthotic, with and without a metatarsal pad in decreasing pain and fear of falling in older adults.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 20, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 23, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 15, 2023
CompletedMay 6, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.1 years
May 14, 2021
May 4, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in pain as assessed by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Pain scores will be collected using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as follows: Levels of pain on a 0 to 10 scale with 0 representing no pain, 2 - mild pain, 5 - moderate pain, 7 - severe pain, and 10 represents extremely severe pain. Utilization of this scale is in line with previous research \[and will measure pain in the feet, ankles, knees, hips, and lower back.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Changes in foot pain & functionality as assessed by the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ)
Baseline and 6 weeks
Fear of falling as assessed by the Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I) short.
Baseline and 6 weeks
Other Outcomes (2)
Analysis of foot structure using the Gaitway scanner.
Baseline
Report how many hours, on average, the orthotics are worn each day.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Prefabricated Orthotics with metatarsal pad
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in Group A will receive the Orthotic with the metatarsal pad (L 2305) according to participants shoe size (https://www.aetrex.com/search?q=l2305\&search-button=\&lang=en\_US). When the investigators provide the Orthotics, an instruction sheet will also be provided, explaining how to use the orthotic. Alternatively, an online video tutorial on how to use the Orthotic will also be available throughout the study. Participants will be required to use the Orthotic wherever possible for a period of 6 weeks, whilst continuing with usual activities.
Prefabricated Orthotics without metatarsal pad.
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in Group B will receive the neutral Orthotic with a cupped heel (L 2300) according to participants shoe size (https://www.aetrex.com/search?q=l2300\&search-button=\&lang=en\_US). When the investigators provide the Orthotics, an instruction sheet will also be provided, explaining how to use the Orthotic. Alternatively, an online video tutorial on how to use the Orthotic will also be available throughout the study. Participants will be required to use the Orthotic wherever possible for a period of 6 weeks, whilst continuing with usual activities
Interventions
An Orthotic insole to be inserted into shoes. Features Aetrex Arch Support to help biomechanically align the body \& help prevent common foot pain such as Plantar Fasciitis, Arch Pain and Metatarsalgia. For medium to high arches with forefoot pain, featuring a cupped heel to cushion and stabilize the back of foot and a metatarsal pad to redistribute weight to relieve ball-of-foot discomfort. With 43% more memory foam in the forefoot for those experiencing foot discomfort or fatigue.
An Orthotic insole to be inserted into shoes. Features Aetrex Arch Support to help biomechanically align the body \& help prevent common foot pain such as Plantar Fasciitis, Arch Pain and Metatarsalgia. With 43% more memory foam in the forefoot for those experiencing foot discomfort or fatigue.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A least 60 years of age
- Live in a community-based setting
- Are capable of ambulation
- Have some form of self-identified foot pain
You may not qualify if:
- Compromised skin integrity of the lower limbs
- Peripheral neuropathy and lack of sensation in the feet.
- Previous history of foot surgery and
- Inability to follow the instructions and procedures of the research protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Talita Cumi Ltd.lead
- Aetrex Worldwide Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Talita Cumi LTD.
Southport, Merseyside, PR8 3NS, United Kingdom
Related Publications (14)
Menz HB. Chronic foot pain in older people. Maturitas. 2016 Sep;91:110-4. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.06.011. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
PMID: 27451329BACKGROUNDVerma SK, Willetts JL, Corns HL, Marucci-Wellman HR, Lombardi DA, Courtney TK. Falls and Fall-Related Injuries among Community-Dwelling Adults in the United States. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150939. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 26977599BACKGROUNDSchoene D, Heller C, Aung YN, Sieber CC, Kemmler W, Freiberger E. A systematic review on the influence of fear of falling on quality of life in older people: is there a role for falls? Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Apr 24;14:701-719. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S197857. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31190764BACKGROUNDBennett PJ, Patterson C. The foot health status questionnaire (FHSQ): a new instrument for measuring outcomes of foot care. Australasian J Podiatr Med. 1998;32:55-9
BACKGROUNDKempen GI, Yardley L, van Haastregt JC, Zijlstra GA, Beyer N, Hauer K, Todd C. The Short FES-I: a shortened version of the falls efficacy scale-international to assess fear of falling. Age Ageing. 2008 Jan;37(1):45-50. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afm157. Epub 2007 Nov 20.
PMID: 18032400BACKGROUNDThomas MJ, Roddy E, Zhang W, Menz HB, Hannan MT, Peat GM. The population prevalence of foot and ankle pain in middle and old age: a systematic review. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(12):2870-2880. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.019. Epub 2011 Oct 21.
PMID: 22019150RESULTRoddy E, Muller S, Thomas E. Onset and persistence of disabling foot pain in community-dwelling older adults over a 3-year period: a prospective cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2011 Apr;66(4):474-80. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq203. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
PMID: 21106703RESULTWhite EG, Mulley GP. Footcare for very elderly people: a community survey. Age Ageing. 1989 Jul;18(4):276-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/18.4.275.
PMID: 2816562RESULTFriedman SM, Munoz B, West SK, Rubin GS, Fried LP. Falls and fear of falling: which comes first? A longitudinal prediction model suggests strategies for primary and secondary prevention. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Aug;50(8):1329-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50352.x.
PMID: 12164987RESULTMulford D, Taggart HM, Nivens A, Payrie C. Arch support use for improving balance and reducing pain in older adults. Appl Nurs Res. 2008 Aug;21(3):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2006.08.006.
PMID: 18684409RESULTde Morais Barbosa C, Barros Bertolo M, Marques Neto JF, Bellini Coimbra I, Davitt M, de Paiva Magalhaes E. The effect of foot orthoses on balance, foot pain and disability in elderly women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Mar;52(3):515-22. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes300. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
PMID: 23192905RESULTPerry SD, Radtke A, McIlroy WE, Fernie GR, Maki BE. Efficacy and effectiveness of a balance-enhancing insole. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2008 Jun;63(6):595-602. doi: 10.1093/gerona/63.6.595.
PMID: 18559634RESULTRiskowski JL, Hagedorn TJ, Hannan MT. Measures of foot function, foot health, and foot pain: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment: Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAM), Bristol Foot Score (BFS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R), Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), Manchester Foot Pain and Disability Index (MFPDI), Podiatric Health Questionnaire (PHQ), and Rowan Foot Pain Assessment (ROFPAQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S229-39. doi: 10.1002/acr.20554. No abstract available.
PMID: 22588747RESULTDelbaere K, Close JC, Mikolaizak AS, Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Lord SR. The Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I). A comprehensive longitudinal validation study. Age Ageing. 2010 Mar;39(2):210-6. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp225. Epub 2010 Jan 8.
PMID: 20061508RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
George Ampat, MBBS, MS, FRCS
Talita Cumi Ltd.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2021
First Posted
May 20, 2021
Study Start
July 23, 2021
Primary Completion
August 31, 2022
Study Completion
January 15, 2023
Last Updated
May 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- The data will become available at the completion of the study on 31/12/2022. It will be available for other researchers indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- The non-identifiable data will be openly available as a supplementary document to the publication.
At the end of the study, data will be fully anonymised. Only non-identifiable, anonymised data will be archived along with the publication for use of other researchers. For instance, the age, sex, and study results of participants will be archived indefinitely as a supplementary document to the publication.