NCT04890756

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to translate and investigate the validity and reliability of the modified Baecke Physical Activity Questionnaire (mBQ) in the Greek adult population.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
145

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2015

Longer than P75 for all trials

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2015

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 20, 2016

Completed
4.7 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 25, 2021

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 22, 2021

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 18, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 18, 2021

Status Verified

May 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 22, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

validationreliabilityadaptationquestionnaireGreek versionBaecke

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Reliability

    The reliability was determined by filling out the modified Baecke Questionnaire, two times, one week apart (test-Retest). Tool: Modified Baecke Questionnaire (test-retest)

    one week apart

  • Validity

    For validation, the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) were compared and the correlation between Modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max (via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between modified Baecke Questionnaire and interview (via METS) were assessed. Tools: 1. International Physical Activity 2. Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test Questionnaires (VO2max) 3. Interview (METS) 2\)

    1) IPAQ ( Time Frame: 30 min) 2) Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test (Time Frame: 20 min) 3) Interview (Time Frame: 45 min) 4)Modified Baecke Questionnaire (Time Frame: 30 min)

Study Arms (2)

Reliability Group

100 Healthy Adults

Other: observational

Validity Group

45 Healthy Adults

Other: observational

Interventions

The reliability was determined (n=100) by filling out the mBQ, two times, one week apart (test-retest). For validation (n=45), the scores between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire were compared and the correlation between the modified Baecke Questionnaire and VO2max(via Astrand-Rhyming Cycle Ergometer Test) and between mBQ and interview (via METS) were assessed.

Reliability GroupValidity Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 59 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Healthy

You may qualify if:

  • age above 18
  • Greek native speakers
  • Greek inhabitants
  • sufficient cognitive functioning.

You may not qualify if:

  • poor health status,
  • diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases
  • cardiac pacemaker,
  • medication that prevents exercise activity
  • neurological disorders with effect on the lower body
  • musculoskeletal disorders or injuries on the lower body in the last 3 months
  • PAR-Q health risk assessment form

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (1)

  • Stefanouli V, Kapreli E, Anastasiadi E, Nakastsis A, Strimpakos N. Validity and reliability of the Greek version of modified Baecke questionnaire. Public Health. 2022 Feb;203:58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.11.017. Epub 2022 Jan 13.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Motor Activity

Interventions

Watchful Waiting

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Outcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services Administration

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical Researcher

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2021

First Posted

May 18, 2021

Study Start

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion

July 20, 2016

Study Completion

March 25, 2021

Last Updated

May 18, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

GDPR protected