NCT04888624

Brief Summary

Surgical site infections are one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The ideal post-operative dressing is impermeable and remains intact preventing contamination of the incision with microorganisms. In addition, it is often difficult for the patient to identify breaks in dressing integrity. This trial compares a post-operative dressing (DrySee® Inc. Houston Tx) with moisture detection allowing the patient to recognize when the dressing is compromised to a standard post-operative dressing (Tegaderm® + Pad, 3M, St. Paul, MN). The ideal dressing also allows the patient to shower without removing the dressing.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 4, 2021

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 13, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 25, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

May 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 11, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.

    A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.

    6-weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • The effectiveness of liquid indication in identifying dressing compromise by visual assessment

    6-weeks

  • A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.

    6-weeks

  • A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment if there was a break in the dressing border.

    6-weeks

  • A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.

    6-weeks

Other Outcomes (1)

  • A comparison of bacterial burden beneath the two dressings measured by fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight, Toronto, CA).

    6-weeks

Study Arms (2)

DrySee® dressing with moisture detection

EXPERIMENTAL

DrySee® dressing with moisture detection

Device: DrySee® dressing with moisture detection

Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing

Device: Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing

Interventions

DrySee® is a waterproof bandage designed to protect surgical incisions. It contains an indicator at the perimeter of the dressing, and at the wound site that turns blue when it comes into contact with liquid (figure 1). The indicator identifies a break in the integrity of the postoperative dressing. Changing the dressing at this point prevents bacteria from reaching the incision reducing the risk of infection. In addition, the waterproof dressing allows patients to shower or bath following surgery.

DrySee® dressing with moisture detection

Tegaderm® is a transparent adhesive dressing commonly used as a postoperative dressing. The dressing has been shown to be superior to gauze in reducing SSIs. Tegaderm®, like DrySee,® is waterproof; however, it lacks technology that identifies a breach in dressing integrity.

Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At least 18 years old.
  • Subject has read, understood, and signed approved consent, and is willing to participate and comply with the study procedures and requirements.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject on an investigational drug or therapeutic device within 30 days of the study visit.
  • Presence of a condition that PI considers will compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  • Known allergy to any of the dressings or their components.
  • The subject has a history of excessive bleeding.
  • The subject has a history of keloid formation.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Serena Group Monroeville

Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Thomas Serena, MD,FACS

    SerenaGroup, Inc.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Healthy subjects drawn from the general population. will undergo a 1.5cm incision on the volar forearm of each arm. The incision will be closed with streriostrips. The subject's incisions will then be randomized to receive either a Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing or DrySee® dressing with moisture detection. The incisions will be photographed three times per week. Data on dressing wear time, integrity and adverse events will be collected every two days in the clinic.
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2021

First Posted

May 17, 2021

Study Start

September 13, 2021

Primary Completion

October 25, 2021

Study Completion

February 1, 2022

Last Updated

March 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations