A Comparison Between Two Post-operative Dressings
DrySee
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Surgical site infections are one of the leading causes of post-operative morbidity and mortality worldwide. The ideal post-operative dressing is impermeable and remains intact preventing contamination of the incision with microorganisms. In addition, it is often difficult for the patient to identify breaks in dressing integrity. This trial compares a post-operative dressing (DrySee® Inc. Houston Tx) with moisture detection allowing the patient to recognize when the dressing is compromised to a standard post-operative dressing (Tegaderm® + Pad, 3M, St. Paul, MN). The ideal dressing also allows the patient to shower without removing the dressing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 13, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 14, 2022
March 1, 2022
1 month
May 4, 2021
March 11, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
A comparison of wear time between the two post-operative dressings under study.
6-weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
The effectiveness of liquid indication in identifying dressing compromise by visual assessment
6-weeks
A comparison of dressing integrity between the two dressings under study if the dressings remains intact at the treatment visits by visual assessment.
6-weeks
A comparison between the two dressings to maintain waterproof protection of the incision by visual assessment if there was a break in the dressing border.
6-weeks
A comparison of adverse events between the two treatment arms.
6-weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
A comparison of bacterial burden beneath the two dressings measured by fluorescence imaging (MolecuLight, Toronto, CA).
6-weeks
Study Arms (2)
DrySee® dressing with moisture detection
EXPERIMENTALDrySee® dressing with moisture detection
Tegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
ACTIVE COMPARATORTegaderm® + Pad transparent film dressing
Interventions
DrySee® is a waterproof bandage designed to protect surgical incisions. It contains an indicator at the perimeter of the dressing, and at the wound site that turns blue when it comes into contact with liquid (figure 1). The indicator identifies a break in the integrity of the postoperative dressing. Changing the dressing at this point prevents bacteria from reaching the incision reducing the risk of infection. In addition, the waterproof dressing allows patients to shower or bath following surgery.
Tegaderm® is a transparent adhesive dressing commonly used as a postoperative dressing. The dressing has been shown to be superior to gauze in reducing SSIs. Tegaderm®, like DrySee,® is waterproof; however, it lacks technology that identifies a breach in dressing integrity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 18 years old.
- Subject has read, understood, and signed approved consent, and is willing to participate and comply with the study procedures and requirements.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject on an investigational drug or therapeutic device within 30 days of the study visit.
- Presence of a condition that PI considers will compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study.
- Known allergy to any of the dressings or their components.
- The subject has a history of excessive bleeding.
- The subject has a history of keloid formation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- SerenaGroup, Inc.lead
- DrySee, Inccollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Serena Group Monroeville
Monroeville, Pennsylvania, 15146, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Thomas Serena, MD,FACS
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2021
First Posted
May 17, 2021
Study Start
September 13, 2021
Primary Completion
October 25, 2021
Study Completion
February 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share