pAF for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
A Phase I/II Randomized Double-Blinded Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) vs. Sterile Amniotic Fluid for Osteoarthritis
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a Phase I/II Randomized Double-Blinded Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) vs. Sterile Amniotic Fluid for Osteoarthritis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Jul 2021
Typical duration for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 27, 2026
CompletedMarch 27, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.6 years
April 29, 2021
January 22, 2026
March 5, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Repeat Allogeneic Intra-articular Injection Within 6 Months.
Participants in both the SOC and pAF treatment arms may require and/or request rescue medication (i.e. SOC injection) at any time and will be given per PI discretion as part of standard of care. The clinicians will not know which study arm the study participant is in but will treat the participant with the SOC injection. This information will be documented and collected in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), as well as the study's electronic data capture system. Participants will not be given any additional pAF injections throughout the study period. The participant will continue to be treated with SOC injections as needed. The outcome will be an indicator of whether or not a subject received a rescue medication within 6 months.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
6 months
Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain)
6 months
Single Assessment Numerical Evaluation (SANE)
6 months
Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test (PF-CAT)
6 months
Other Outcomes (1)
Number of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Directly Related to the Injection.
1 day, 2 days, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Amniotic Fluid Injection
EXPERIMENTALAmniotic Fluid Injection, 3ml, one time dose.
Standard of Care Steroid Injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORCorticosteroids, 3ml, one time dose.
Interventions
Comparison of Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) injection vs. Sterile Processed Amniotic Fluid Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis
Comparison of Standard of Care (Corticosteroid) injection vs. Sterile Processed Amniotic Fluid Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are between the ages of 18-70 years
- A confirmed diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis based on clinical and radiographic findings consistent with Kellgren-Lawrence Stage 2-3 disease
- Patients who have failed conservative treatment (e.g. steroid, activity modification, therapy, etc.) within 3 months
- Unilateral or bilateral chronic knee joint pain \>4 months
- Patients who are able to ambulate (i.e. not wheelchair bound)
- Patient reported a typical pain of at least 4 out of 10 during the past week using VAS numeric pain scale (0-10)
- Patients who are of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception for 90 days after study drug injection
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who have had a previous injection (i.e. steroid, platelet rich plasma, or other) within the last 3 months
- A focal chondral defect, defined by x-ray evaluation
- BMI \>40 as defined by NIH Clinical Guidelines Body Mass Index
- Concurrent participation in another investigational trial involving systemic administration of agents (within the previous 30 days) or plans to participate in any other allogeneic stem cell therapy trial during the 12 month follow-up period
- Clinical suspicion of infection at injection site
- Any surgeries within 4 weeks, other than diagnostic surgery
- Insulin or self-reported non-insulin dependent diabetic evident of HgA1c ≥8% among known diabetics
- Unable to consent to an English Language Consent Form
- Frank mechanical issues (i.e. locking of the knee)
- Workman's Compensation cases
- Rheumatoid arthritis
- Patients with a known allergy to local anesthetics or components of the study drug (pAF or steroid injection)
- Patients with vascular claudication or neurologic disorders affecting the index lower limb
- Patients with inflammatory arthropathies or connective tissue disorders; or
- Patients with known alcohol or drug abuse or dependence, recreational use of illicit drug or prescription medications, or have used medical marijuana within 7 days of study enrollment
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Utah Orthopedic Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
Related Publications (19)
Kotlarz H, Gunnarsson CL, Fang H, Rizzo JA. Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Dec;60(12):3546-53. doi: 10.1002/art.24984.
PMID: 19950287BACKGROUNDUnderwood MA, Gilbert WM, Sherman MP. Amniotic fluid: not just fetal urine anymore. J Perinatol. 2005 May;25(5):341-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211290.
PMID: 15861199BACKGROUNDPrusa AR, Marton E, Rosner M, Bernaschek G, Hengstschlager M. Oct-4-expressing cells in human amniotic fluid: a new source for stem cell research? Hum Reprod. 2003 Jul;18(7):1489-93. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg279.
PMID: 12832377BACKGROUNDBottai D, Cigognini D, Nicora E, Moro M, Grimoldi MG, Adami R, Abrignani S, Marconi AM, Di Giulio AM, Gorio A. Third trimester amniotic fluid cells with the capacity to develop neural phenotypes and with heterogeneity among sub-populations. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2012;30(1):55-68. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2011-0620.
PMID: 22377907BACKGROUNDJohnson, H.L., Peritoneal Immunization. The American Journal of Surgery, 1936. 34(2): p. 266-271
BACKGROUNDShimberg, M., The Use of Amniotic Fluid Concentrate in Orthopedic Conditions. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1938(20): p. 167-177
BACKGROUNDIsmail MA, Salti GI, Moawad AH. Effect of amniotic fluid on bacterial recovery and growth: clinical implications. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989 Aug;44(8):571-7. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198908000-00001. No abstract available.
PMID: 2668811BACKGROUNDOjo VA, Okpere EE, Obaseiki-Ebor EE. Antimicrobial properties of amniotic fluid from some Nigerian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1986 Apr;24(2):97-101. doi: 10.1016/0020-7292(86)90002-0.
PMID: 2874087BACKGROUNDSiggers J, Ostergaard MV, Siggers RH, Skovgaard K, Molbak L, Thymann T, Schmidt M, Moller HK, Purup S, Fink LN, Frokiaer H, Boye M, Sangild PT, Bering SB. Postnatal amniotic fluid intake reduces gut inflammatory responses and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2013 May 15;304(10):G864-75. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00278.2012. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
PMID: 23518680BACKGROUNDOzgenel GY, Filiz G, Ozcan M. Effects of human amniotic fluid on cartilage regeneration from free perichondrial grafts in rabbits. Br J Plast Surg. 2004 Jul;57(5):423-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2003.12.021.
PMID: 15191823BACKGROUNDOzgenel GY, Filiz G. Combined application of human amniotic membrane wrapping and hyaluronic acid injection in epineurectomized rat sciatic nerve. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2004 Feb;20(2):153-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-820772.
PMID: 15011124BACKGROUNDKaracal N, Kosucu P, Cobanglu U, Kutlu N. Effect of human amniotic fluid on bone healing. J Surg Res. 2005 Dec;129(2):283-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2005.03.026.
PMID: 15916770BACKGROUNDCastro-Combs J, Noguera G, Cano M, Yew M, Gehlbach PL, Palmer J, Behrens A. Corneal wound healing is modulated by topical application of amniotic fluid in an ex vivo organ culture model. Exp Eye Res. 2008 Jul;87(1):56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2008.04.010. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
PMID: 18555991BACKGROUNDNyman E, Huss F, Nyman T, Junker J, Kratz G. Hyaluronic acid, an important factor in the wound healing properties of amniotic fluid: in vitro studies of re-epithelialisation in human skin wounds. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2013 Apr;47(2):89-92. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2012.733169. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
PMID: 23356944BACKGROUNDWeissenbacher T, Laubender RP, Witkin SS, Gingelmaier A, Schiessl B, Kainer F, Friese K, Jeschke U, Dian D, Karl K. Influence of maternal age, gestational age and fetal gender on expression of immune mediators in amniotic fluid. BMC Res Notes. 2012 Jul 24;5:375. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-375.
PMID: 22827842BACKGROUNDMerimee TJ, Grant M, Tyson JE. Insulin-like growth factors in amniotic fluid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1984 Oct;59(4):752-5. doi: 10.1210/jcem-59-4-752.
PMID: 6384254BACKGROUNDHung M, Bounsanga J, Voss MW, Saltzman CL. Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics. World J Orthop. 2018 Mar 18;9(3):41-49. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v9.i3.41. eCollection 2018 Mar 18.
PMID: 29564213BACKGROUNDWinterstein AP, McGuine TA, Carr KE, Hetzel SJ. Comparison of IKDC and SANE Outcome Measures Following Knee Injury in Active Female Patients. Sports Health. 2013 Nov;5(6):523-9. doi: 10.1177/1941738113499300.
PMID: 24427427BACKGROUNDRoos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.
PMID: 12801417BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Protocol deviations and participant eligibility were monitored throughout the study. Procedures were in place to document any errors in treatment administration or deviations from eligibility criteria.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jamie Egbert, MPH
- Organization
- University of Utah Health: Department of Orthopaedics
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Petron, MD
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Half of the patients will be in the SOC treatment arm and half of the patients will be in the AF arm. The PI and patients will be blinded as to the arm in which they will be participating. Once the randomization number is obtained, unblinded research staff will prepare the appropriate study drug. The injections will be blinded to the research coordinator in charge of data entry, the treating physician and the patient.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2021
First Posted
May 14, 2021
Study Start
July 8, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2025
Study Completion
January 31, 2025
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Results First Posted
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share