Customized Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction
Accuracy, Fitness, Compatibility, and Clinical Outcomes of Customized Implants and Prosthesis in Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstruction
1 other identifier
observational
150
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Regional oral and maxillofacial defects secondary to ablative tissue resection can contribute to severe aesthetic and functional loss, which influences patients' regular life and may cause psychological problems. Microvascular free flaps are considered the gold standard for reconstructing large oral and maxillofacial defects. In the past decade, with the help of computer-aided design (CAD)/ computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) customized implants and prosthesis (CIP) have led to a significant improvement of the operative accuracy, improve the flap survival rate and enhance the patients' quality of life. Concerning the increased overall survival rate of the patients, people pay more attention to the quality of life and aesthetic appearance which are influenced by the fitness and compatibility of the CIP. However, from literature reviews, the evaluation was various to be concluded in some certain conditions from pooled studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 1996
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1996
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 6, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedNovember 21, 2022
November 1, 2022
25.3 years
May 6, 2021
November 18, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The survival rate of the dental implants
12 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
One stage dental implants placement
Second stage dental implants placement
Interventions
The time of dental implant surgery
Eligibility Criteria
The files of patients diagnosed and treated between December 2004 and January 2020 for defect of dentition secondary to jaw resection were retrospectively reviewed. The patients who underwent dental implant surgery after ablative tumor resection with segmental mandibulectomy and vascularized bone flap graft were retrieved from the database.
You may qualify if:
- \. Patients with grafted bone (fibula, iliac, scapula) and receive postoperative implant surgery.
- Clinical and radiogram data were available for all treatment periods and follow-up visits (Pre-/post-CBCT and panoramic radiographs).
- Over twelve months follow-up period after implant placement. 4.Age \> 18 years. 5.Fabrication and delivery of prosthesis following implant installation. 6.Treatment with a one-stage/two-stage surgical protocol.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis.
- Lost or missing medical history during follow-up period.
- Follow-up period of dental implants was less than 12 months.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- KU Leuvenlead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 12 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PhD researcher,
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 6, 2021
First Posted
May 12, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 1996
Primary Completion
May 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
November 21, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-11