NCT04882787

Brief Summary

Participants will wear one set of 2 different BTE hearing aid models based on the gain required by their hearing loss. The hearing aids will be programmed based on a prescriptive approach and participants will be sent out for either one home trial with the less powerful BTEs or for two home trials with the SP (super power) BTEs.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 4, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 14, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 13, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 13, 2021

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 12, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 12, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

May 4, 2021

Results QC Date

March 4, 2022

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Number of Participants With 'Total Impression' Sound Quality as 'Good'

    Participants with 'good' response of 7 or higher on 'Total Impression' scale; Gabrielsson citation/article includes seven perceptual scales and a scale for 'Total Impression' which is described as 'an overall judgment of how good you think the reproduction is'. Possible scores from 0 to 10 with descriptors provided: 0 (min), 1 (very bad), 3 (rather bad), 5 (midway), 7 (rather good), 9 (very good), 10 (max) A higher score reflects a better outcome.

    final appointment (end of 3 weeks home trial for BTE model, end of 7 weeks home trial for SP-BTE model)

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Number and Percentage of Participants Reporting No Reboots

    at any time during home trial, reported at or by final appointment(end of 3 weeks home trial for BTE model, end of 7 weeks home trial for SP-BTE model)

  • Number of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Boost Controls

    initial appointment (day of fitting of hearing aids)

  • Number of Participants Reporting Perceived Differences With Both of the App Slider Controls

    initial appointment (day of fitting of hearing aids)

Study Arms (1)

BTE hearing aid model

EXPERIMENTAL

BTE or SP-BTE (super power) hearing aid fitting

Device: BTE hearing aid

Interventions

Amplification

BTE hearing aid model

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • hearing aid candidacy (N2-N7 hearing loss)
  • healthy outer and middle ears
  • ability to complete questionnaires
  • willingness to use smartphone
  • informed consent documented by a signature
  • willingness to wear a binaural BTE fitting
  • willingness to use app and accessories
  • willingness to adhere to COVID protocols

You may not qualify if:

  • contraindications to the MD in this study: known hypersensitivity or allergy to investigational product/earmold
  • limited mobility/not able to attend appointments
  • limited ability to describe listening impressions/experiences
  • inability to produce a reliable hearing test result
  • limited dexterity - to point that participant cannot manage hearing aid insertion/removal
  • known psychological disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unitron Hearing

Kitchener, Ontario, N2E 1Y6, Canada

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Gabrielsson A, Schenkman BN, Hagerman B. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. J Speech Hear Res. 1988 Jun;31(2):166-77. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3102.166.

    PMID: 3398490BACKGROUND
  • Valente M, Van Vliet D. The Independent Hearing Aid Fitting Forum (IHAFF) Protocol. Trends Amplif. 1997 Mar;2(1):6-35. doi: 10.1177/108471389700200102. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25425874BACKGROUND
  • Likert, Rensis. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology. 1932; 140: 1-55.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing DisordersEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jinyu Qian, Director Innovation Centre Toronto
Organization
Sonova

Study Officials

  • Jinyu Qian, PhD

    Sonova AG

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: 2 groups based on hearing aid gain needs; one similar intervention
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 4, 2021

First Posted

May 12, 2021

Study Start

May 14, 2021

Primary Completion

July 13, 2021

Study Completion

July 13, 2021

Last Updated

August 12, 2024

Results First Posted

August 12, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-06

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations