NCT04881591

Brief Summary

The present project aims to test the feasibility of a new management mechanism for inter-visit monitoring of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis that improves the quality and safety of current orthopedic treatments using information and communication technologies (ICT).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2021

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2021

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2022

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

April 7, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 26, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

ICTTreatment AdherenceTreatment efficacyTreatment safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • App' usability will be assessed by the SUS

    The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higher usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.

    During the app use (one week after app first use)

  • App' usability will be assessed by the SUS

    The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higer usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.

    Immediately after the app use (3 months after app first use)

  • App' acceptability will be assessed by the SUS

    The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higer usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.

    During the app use (one week after app first use)

  • App' acceptability will be assessed by the SUS

    The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higer usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.

    Immediately after the app use (3 months after app first use)

  • Feasibility of the study will be assessed by a calculation of responses completed

    Percentage of completed assessments in the app compared to the number of planned evaluations will be calculated

    Immediately after the app use (3 months after app first use)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Stress

    Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)

  • Patients' Quality of life

    Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)

  • Perceived health status

    Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)

  • Anxiety and depressive symptoms

    Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)

  • Mood

    Daily up to 3 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

APP+Usual Treatment

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their scoliosis but also they will be monitored daily using the Scoliosis Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished undesired events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received.

Device: Treatment as usual + APP

Interventions

Participants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their scoliosis but also they will be monitored daily using the Scoliosis Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished undesired events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received.

APP+Usual Treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adolescente patient (between 10 and 18 years old)
  • Wearing a brace for less than 3 months
  • The patient has a mobile phone with Android or iOS operating systems
  • The patients has the physical ability to use the application
  • The patient does not present psychological and or cognitive alterations/ problems with language that make their participation difficult
  • The patient (or the legal tutor) voluntarily wants to participate and sings the informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • The patient does not have an own mobile phone or has a mobile phone with uncompatible characteristics
  • Cognitive alterations, lenguage problems to understand the use of the app and to respond its questions
  • The patient presents a severe mental health issues or substance abuse.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Vall d'Hebron Hospital

Barcelona, Spain

RECRUITING

Related Publications (16)

  • Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):925-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9. Epub 2005 Nov 18.

    PMID: 16328223BACKGROUND
  • Charosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin D; Study Group on Scoliosis. Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 15;37(8):693-700. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ff5c1.

    PMID: 22504517BACKGROUND
  • D'Astous JL, Sanders JO. Casting and traction treatment methods for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;38(4):477-84, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.03.006.

    PMID: 17945127BACKGROUND
  • Dunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Blasi PR, Nguyen M, Lin JS. Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 Jan 9;319(2):173-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11669.

    PMID: 29318283BACKGROUND
  • Fong DY, Lee CF, Cheung KM, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam TP, Mak KH, Yip PS, Luk KD. A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):1061-71. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bcc835.

    PMID: 20393399BACKGROUND
  • Janicki JA, Alman B. Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Nov;12(9):771-6. doi: 10.1093/pch/12.9.771.

    PMID: 19030463BACKGROUND
  • Lenssinck ML, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, Bierman-Zeinstra SM, Verkerk K, Verhagen AP. Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1329-39.

    PMID: 16305271BACKGROUND
  • Morton A, Riddle R, Buchanan R, Katz D, Birch J. Accuracy in the prediction and estimation of adherence to bracewear before and during treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Apr-May;28(3):336-41. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318168d154.

    PMID: 18362800BACKGROUND
  • Negrini S, Atanasio S, Zaina F, Romano M. Rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of exercises and bracing from a series of clinical studies. Europa Medicophysica-SIMFER 2007 Award Winner. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Jun;44(2):169-76.

    PMID: 18418337BACKGROUND
  • Negrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, Diers H, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Lebel A, Marti C, Maruyama T, O'Brien J, Price N, Parent E, Rigo M, Romano M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Zaina F. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018 Jan 10;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8. eCollection 2018.

    PMID: 29435499BACKGROUND
  • Reichel D, Schanz J. Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Dec;6(3-4):221-5. doi: 10.1080/13638490310001644593.

    PMID: 14713589BACKGROUND
  • Suso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A. Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.

    PMID: 29659375BACKGROUND
  • Tones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):3027-38. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc.

    PMID: 17173000BACKGROUND
  • Weinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1527-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3.

    PMID: 18456103BACKGROUND
  • Yaman O, Dalbayrak S. Idiopathic scoliosis. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(5):646-57. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8838-13.0.

    PMID: 25269032BACKGROUND
  • Yang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ, Skaggs DL. Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Review of History, Current Treatment, and Future Directions. Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0709. Epub 2015 Dec 7.

    PMID: 26644484BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ScoliosisTreatment Adherence and Compliance

Interventions

Therapeutics

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal CurvaturesSpinal DiseasesBone DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Azucena García-Palacios, PhD

    Universitat Jaume I

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Judith Sánchez-Raya, PhD

    Hospitla Universitario Vall d'Hebron

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Amanda Díaz-García, PhD

    Universidad de Zaragoza

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Diana Castilla, PhD

    University of Valencia

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Verónica Martínez-Borba, MsC

    Universitat Jaume I

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Carlos Suso-Ribera, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
Patients will be informed of the condition they have been assigned to.
Purpose
DEVICE FEASIBILITY
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: One condition
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2021

First Posted

May 11, 2021

Study Start

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion

June 30, 2022

Study Completion

December 31, 2022

Last Updated

August 2, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Only Dra. Sánchez-Raya will be able to access to individual participant data.

Locations