Improving Adherence and Safety of Orthopedic Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis in Adolescents Using Information and Communication Technologies
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The present project aims to test the feasibility of a new management mechanism for inter-visit monitoring of adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis that improves the quality and safety of current orthopedic treatments using information and communication technologies (ICT).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 7, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedAugust 2, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.1 years
April 7, 2021
July 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
App' usability will be assessed by the SUS
The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higher usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.
During the app use (one week after app first use)
App' usability will be assessed by the SUS
The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higer usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.
Immediately after the app use (3 months after app first use)
App' acceptability will be assessed by the SUS
The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higer usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.
During the app use (one week after app first use)
App' acceptability will be assessed by the SUS
The System Usability Scale will be administered to assess the perception that a tool is simple to use and useful. It is composed by 10 items which are responded according to a 5-point Likert scale (1 = "completely disagree" to 5 ="completely agree"). Half of the items are recorded so that higher scores in the scale represent higer usability. Total scores are converted into percentages from 0% to 100%.
Immediately after the app use (3 months after app first use)
Feasibility of the study will be assessed by a calculation of responses completed
Percentage of completed assessments in the app compared to the number of planned evaluations will be calculated
Immediately after the app use (3 months after app first use)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Stress
Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)
Patients' Quality of life
Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)
Perceived health status
Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)
Anxiety and depressive symptoms
Twice: at baseline (beggining of the study, before the brace use) and at end of the study (3 months after app first use)
Mood
Daily up to 3 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
APP+Usual Treatment
EXPERIMENTALParticipants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their scoliosis but also they will be monitored daily using the Scoliosis Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished undesired events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received.
Interventions
Participants at this condition will receive the usual medical treatment for their scoliosis but also they will be monitored daily using the Scoliosis Pain Monitor APP. Alarms will be generated in the face of certain preestablished undesired events. Physicians will be asked to call patients and change/stop treatment if an alarm is received.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adolescente patient (between 10 and 18 years old)
- Wearing a brace for less than 3 months
- The patient has a mobile phone with Android or iOS operating systems
- The patients has the physical ability to use the application
- The patient does not present psychological and or cognitive alterations/ problems with language that make their participation difficult
- The patient (or the legal tutor) voluntarily wants to participate and sings the informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- The patient does not have an own mobile phone or has a mobile phone with uncompatible characteristics
- Cognitive alterations, lenguage problems to understand the use of the app and to respond its questions
- The patient presents a severe mental health issues or substance abuse.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Vall d'Hebron Hospital
Barcelona, Spain
Related Publications (16)
Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):925-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
PMID: 16328223BACKGROUNDCharosky S, Guigui P, Blamoutier A, Roussouly P, Chopin D; Study Group on Scoliosis. Complications and risk factors of primary adult scoliosis surgery: a multicenter study of 306 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Apr 15;37(8):693-700. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ff5c1.
PMID: 22504517BACKGROUNDD'Astous JL, Sanders JO. Casting and traction treatment methods for scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007 Oct;38(4):477-84, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2007.03.006.
PMID: 17945127BACKGROUNDDunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Blasi PR, Nguyen M, Lin JS. Screening for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 Jan 9;319(2):173-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11669.
PMID: 29318283BACKGROUNDFong DY, Lee CF, Cheung KM, Cheng JC, Ng BK, Lam TP, Mak KH, Yip PS, Luk KD. A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 1;35(10):1061-71. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bcc835.
PMID: 20393399BACKGROUNDJanicki JA, Alman B. Scoliosis: Review of diagnosis and treatment. Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Nov;12(9):771-6. doi: 10.1093/pch/12.9.771.
PMID: 19030463BACKGROUNDLenssinck ML, Frijlink AC, Berger MY, Bierman-Zeinstra SM, Verkerk K, Verhagen AP. Effect of bracing and other conservative interventions in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents: a systematic review of clinical trials. Phys Ther. 2005 Dec;85(12):1329-39.
PMID: 16305271BACKGROUNDMorton A, Riddle R, Buchanan R, Katz D, Birch J. Accuracy in the prediction and estimation of adherence to bracewear before and during treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Apr-May;28(3):336-41. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318168d154.
PMID: 18362800BACKGROUNDNegrini S, Atanasio S, Zaina F, Romano M. Rehabilitation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results of exercises and bracing from a series of clinical studies. Europa Medicophysica-SIMFER 2007 Award Winner. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008 Jun;44(2):169-76.
PMID: 18418337BACKGROUNDNegrini S, Donzelli S, Aulisa AG, Czaprowski D, Schreiber S, de Mauroy JC, Diers H, Grivas TB, Knott P, Kotwicki T, Lebel A, Marti C, Maruyama T, O'Brien J, Price N, Parent E, Rigo M, Romano M, Stikeleather L, Wynne J, Zaina F. 2016 SOSORT guidelines: orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018 Jan 10;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0145-8. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29435499BACKGROUNDReichel D, Schanz J. Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003 Jul-Dec;6(3-4):221-5. doi: 10.1080/13638490310001644593.
PMID: 14713589BACKGROUNDSuso-Ribera C, Castilla D, Zaragoza I, Ribera-Canudas MV, Botella C, Garcia-Palacios A. Validity, Reliability, Feasibility, and Usefulness of Pain Monitor: A Multidimensional Smartphone App for Daily Monitoring of Adults With Heterogenous Chronic Pain. Clin J Pain. 2018 Oct;34(10):900-908. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000618.
PMID: 29659375BACKGROUNDTones M, Moss N, Polly DW Jr. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Dec 15;31(26):3027-38. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000249555.87601.fc.
PMID: 17173000BACKGROUNDWeinstein SL, Dolan LA, Cheng JC, Danielsson A, Morcuende JA. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 2008 May 3;371(9623):1527-37. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60658-3.
PMID: 18456103BACKGROUNDYaman O, Dalbayrak S. Idiopathic scoliosis. Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(5):646-57. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8838-13.0.
PMID: 25269032BACKGROUNDYang S, Andras LM, Redding GJ, Skaggs DL. Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Review of History, Current Treatment, and Future Directions. Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0709. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
PMID: 26644484BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Azucena García-Palacios, PhD
Universitat Jaume I
- STUDY CHAIR
Judith Sánchez-Raya, PhD
Hospitla Universitario Vall d'Hebron
- STUDY CHAIR
Amanda Díaz-García, PhD
Universidad de Zaragoza
- STUDY CHAIR
Diana Castilla, PhD
University of Valencia
- STUDY CHAIR
Verónica Martínez-Borba, MsC
Universitat Jaume I
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Patients will be informed of the condition they have been assigned to.
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 7, 2021
First Posted
May 11, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
August 2, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Only Dra. Sánchez-Raya will be able to access to individual participant data.