Which Ventilatory Strategy is Better for Lung in Upper Abdominal Surgeries?
Ultrasonographic Assessment of Atelectasis in Major Upper Abdominal Surgeries With Different Ventilatory Strategies
1 other identifier
interventional
117
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Ventilated Patients especially those undergoing upper abdominal surgeries are prone to lung atelectasis. They are at risk of adverse effects secondary to inadequate lung ventilation. Applied PEEP and Recruitment maneuver are thought to enhance lung aeration under general anesthesia which could be assessed by ultrasound.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 4, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedMay 4, 2021
May 1, 2021
1.1 years
May 2, 2021
May 2, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pre-emergence LUS score
Lung ultrasonography score (LUS score) between groups at the end of surgery (just before emergence) as a lower LUS indicates better lung aeration.
intraoperative before recovery from anesthesia
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Lung ultrasonography score (LUS score)
preoperative, intraoperative for anesthesia duration to 1 hour postoperative
Heart rate
preoperative, intraoperative for anesthesia duration to 1 hour postoperative
Mean blood pressure
preoperative, intraoperative to 1 hour postoperative
oxygen saturation
preoperative, intraoperative to 1 hour postoperative
End-tidal carbon dioxide tension
intraoperative for anesthesia duration
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Low PEEP
PLACEBO COMPARATORLow positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and no recruitment maneuver (RM)
High PEEP
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)
High PEEP/RM
ACTIVE COMPARATORHigh positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and recruitment maneuver (RM)
Interventions
Patients will be ventilated with a PEEP of 4 cm H2O and no RMs throughout the study
PEEP of 10 cm H2O and RM (30 cm H2O for 30 s) immediately after the second lung ultrasonographic examination and repeated every 30 minutes till emergence
The thorax will divided into 12 quadrants, each of them will be assigned a score of 0-3 as 0, normal lung sliding with fewer than three single B lines 1. three or more B lines 2. coalescent B lines 3. consolidated lung. The LUS (0-36) will be calculated with higher scores indicating more aeration loss
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status grades I, II, and III.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal.
- Psychiatric diseases.
- Body Mass Index \> 35 Kg/m2.
- Previous intrathoracic procedures.
- History of severe obstructive pulmonary disease.
- History of severe restrictive lung disease.
- Pulmonary arterial hypertension ( systolic pulmonary arterial pressure \>40 mmHg).
- Pregnancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, DK, 050, Egypt
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Aboelnour E Badran, MD
Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hanaa M EL- Bendary, MD
Assistant Professor of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double-blind (Participant, Outcomes Assessor).
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2021
First Posted
May 4, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
May 4, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- after completing the study and acceptance for publication
- Access Criteria
- Sharing Criteria: the data will be accessible to the investigators and PRS administrators with hiding the identifiers for the patients.
will be available after completing the study and acceptance for publication