NCT04869618

Brief Summary

Early detection and treatment of gastric premalignant lesion and early gastric cancer (EGC) have been proposed to improve outcomes of gastric cancer. Gastric dysplasia is a premalignant lesion and the penultimate stage in gastric carcinogenesis. On white light endoscopy (WLE), it is difficult to distinguish gastric dysplasia and EGC from benign pathology such as gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM). Image enhanced endoscopy such as narrow-band imaging (NBI) is recommended to improve characterization of suspicious gastric lesions detected on WLE. Magnified-endoscopy with NBI (ME-NBI) have been shown to be superior to HD-WLE for diagnosis of GIM and EGC. Data on gastric dysplasia is less robust. Ultimately, biopsy is required to confirm diagnosis of gastric dysplasia/EGC. Gastric dysplasia can be classified into low-grade dysplasia (LGD) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Biopsy sampling may not be representative of the final histopathological grade of resected specimens and may under-stage dysplasia. Thus, endoscopic resection (ER) is recommended for gastric dysplasia and EGC on biopsy for diagnostic and therapeutic purpose. The current gap is to improve concordance of endoscopic and histologic findings of gastric dysplasia and early gastric cancer. Raman spectroscopy based artificial intelligence system (SPECTRA IMDx) was developed to provide an objective method to identify patients with gastric premalignant lesions and EGC. SPECTRA IMDx interrogate tissues at the cellular level and utilizes molecular information to provide actionable information to endoscopist during gastroscopy. Studies on diagnostic performance using Raman spectroscopy analysis devices have shown high sensitivity and specificity in detection of gastric cancer and precancerous lesions compared to WLE. However, these studies included few GIM, gastric dysplasia and gastric carcinoma. It is still unclear if Raman spectroscopy outperforms WLE in diagnosis of gastric HGD and EGC. In addition, the Raman spectroscopy algorithm is only able to characterize lesions into high risk (HGD/EGC) versus low risk (GIM/LGD/Gastritis/Normal). It is also uncertain if this technology is able to differentiate GIM and LGD. We plan to conduct a prospective trial to validate the diagnostic accuracy of SPECTRA for prediction of gastric HGD and EGC prior to gastric ER. Hypothesis: SPECTRA IMDx is able to differentiate higher risk lesions (HGD/EGC) from lower risk tissue/lesion (GIM/LGD/Gastritis/Normal)

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 28, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2021

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2022

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 28, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Diagnostic performance of SPECTRA IMDx for assessment of lower risk lesion (GIM/LGD/Gastritis/Normal) and higher risk lesions (HGD/EGC) against the gold standard of histopathology from gastric resection specimen

    Diagnostic performance: accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value

    24 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Comparison of diagnostic performance of SPECTRA IMDx versus HD-WLE for assessment of high grade dysplasia/early gastric cancer

    24 months

  • Feasibility of Raman spectroscopy to differentiate GIM, LGD, HGD and EGC against the gold standard of histopathology

    24 months

  • Feasibility of Raman spectroscopy to identify gastric dysplasia and EGC from scar tissues post-ER during surveillance endoscopy.

    24 months

  • Evaluation of performance of HD-WLE combined with NBI in detection of HGD/EGD prior to ER.

    24 months

Interventions

The SPECTRA IMDx system is developed on the basis of Raman spectroscopy. It comprises a laser system, a spectrometer, a computer with an analysis algorithm installed, and other ancillary parts. The SPECTRA IMDx system also comprises a SPECTRA IMDx probe that can be connected with the main system. The SPECTRA IMDx probe is an assembly of optical fibres and optical components arranged for maximal transmission of light energy. When in use, the laser system will emit a 785nm near infra-red laser that will be transmitted through the SPECTRA IMDx probe to the distal end. When the laser is interrogated upon a tissue surface, the light energy is absorbed and reflected. The reflected energy is then collected from the distal end of the SPECTRA IMDx probe, transmitted back to the main system, and passed through the spectrometer. The collected signal is then processed to obtain the clean Raman signal, which is then parsed through an analysis algorithm for diagnosis.

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Known diagnosis of gastric dysplasia with visible lesion or early gastric cancer amenable to gastric ER (EMR or ESD); diagnosis made based on biopsy from gastroscopy performed within past six months
  • Age 21 to 90 years (selected age range based on demographic of patients managed at Changi General Hospital)
  • Ability to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects without mental capacity, refusal to provide consent, incarcerated status, pregnant subjects.
  • Subjects with advanced gastric cancer not amenable to endoscopic resection
  • Subjects with bleeding disorders, such as haemophilia, in whom ER and biopsies are contraindicated.
  • Subjects with active bleeding or coagulopathy precluding ER and biopsies.
  • Subject with severe co-morbid illness, such as end-stage renal failure (ESRF), congestive cardiac failure (CCF) and advanced liver cirrhosis.
  • Subjects on regular anti-platelet medications except aspirin or anti-coagulants must be able to undergo adequate washout period before gastroscopy. The subject's physician or study co-investigator will exercise their clinical judgement to ensure subject's safety.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Changi General Hospital

Singapore, 529889, Singapore

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stomach Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsDigestive System DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesStomach Diseases

Study Officials

  • Chin Kimg Tan, MD

    Changi General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 28, 2021

First Posted

May 3, 2021

Study Start

May 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 1, 2022

Study Completion

March 1, 2023

Last Updated

May 3, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations