Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer
ACT
Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Fatigue Interference and Health-related Quality of Life Among Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Lung cancer is a malignant tumor that has transformed from a single cancer disease into one of the most striking global health problems. Lung cancer has an insidious onset, and most patients are first diagnosed with the middle and advanced stage. Cancer related fatigue is the most common and distressing symptom reported by lung cancer patients. For cancer patients, fatigue has lasting impact on physical, psychological and social functions, interferes with activities and participating in life events, thereby worsening the health-related quality of life. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is the third-wave cognitive behavioral therapy to improve functioning and health-related quality of life by increasing psychological flexibility. The study aims to examine the effectiveness of ACT on fatigue interference and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced lung cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable lung-cancer
Started Jul 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable lung-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 7, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2022
CompletedOctober 4, 2022
October 1, 2022
6 months
April 27, 2021
October 3, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change from baseline in the score of fatigue interference assessed by The Fatigue Symptom Inventory at one week after the intervention
A 13-item instrument that measures the intensity and interference of fatigue over the previous 7 days. The first four items are used to assess the intensity of fatigue, Item 5 - Item 11 are to assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with different aspects, such as general activity, bathe and dress ability, work activity, concentration ability, relation with others, enjoyment of life and mood, using a 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no interference) to 10 (extreme interference). 0 indicates no fatigue and 127 indicates the worst fatigue intensity and interference. Change= (One week after the intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, one week after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of the score of fatigue interference assessed by The Fatigue Symptom Inventory at three months after the 4-week intervention
A 13-item instrument that measures the intensity and interference of fatigue over the previous 7 days. The first four items are used to assess the intensity of fatigue, Item 5 - Item 11 are to assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with different aspects, such as general activity, bathe and dress ability, work activity, concentration ability, relation with others, enjoyment of life and mood, using a 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (no interference) to 10 (extreme interference). 0 indicates no fatigue and 127 indicates the worst fatigue intensity and interference. Change= (Three months after the intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline (T0) and three months follow-up (T2, three months after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of health-related quality of life assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung, Version 4 at one week after the intervention
36 items scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) to assess QoL of lung cancer patients, including 5 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, and additional concerns about lung cancer. The overall score can be obtained by adding all subscale scores. 0 indicates no quality of life and 144 indicates the highest quality of life. Change= (One week after the intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, one week after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of health-related quality of life assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung, Version 4 at three months after the 4-week intervention
36 items scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much) to assess QoL of lung cancer patients, including 5 domains: physical, social/family, emotional, and functional well-being, and additional concerns about lung cancer. The overall score can be obtained by adding all subscale scores. 0 indicates no quality of life and 144 indicates the highest quality of life. Change= (Three months after the intervention score - Baseline score)
Baseline (T0) and three months follow-up (T2, three months after the 4-week intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Change from baseline in the score of cancer related fatigue assessed by The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory at one week after the intervention
Baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, one week after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of cancer related fatigue assessed by The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory at three months after the intervention
Baseline (T0) and three months follow-up (T2, three months after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of depressive symptoms assessed by The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at one week after the intervention.
Baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, one week after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of depressive symptoms assessed by The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) at three months after the intervention.
Baseline (T0) and three months follow-up (T2, three months after the 4-week intervention)
Change from baseline in the score of anxiety assessed by Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) at one week after the intervention.
Baseline (T0) and post-intervention (T1, one week after the 4-week intervention)
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ACT group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention group will receive ACT intervention, consisting of four individual sessions (First session by face to face, the last three sessions by Wechat) of 60-90 min each (once/week), in addition to usual care.
Usual care group
OTHERParticipants randomized to the control group will receive usual care, including treatments and daily care during admission, medication instructions, diet and exercise advice, retest recommendations when discharge.
Interventions
Session 1: This session aims to let the participants get familiar with the interventionist. The interventionist will tell them the purpose of the program and basic rules. And the interventionist will promise their privacy protection. Session 2: This session includes how to separate thoughts/feelings/sensations related to diagnose with advanced lung cancer and experience of fatigue with facts and see these feelings in an objective way with observing self. Session 3: This session mainly aims to help participants understand the importance of values, differentiate values from goals and clarify their personal values. Session 4: This session aims at helping patients practice to engaging in committed action based on chosen values, motivated to change behavior in consistency with life direction and health goal.
The usual care mainly includes treatments and daily care during admission, medication instructions, diet and exercise advice, retest recommendations when discharge
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- aged 18 or over;
- diagnosed with stage III or stage IV lung cancer by pathological section or cytology;
- experienced unexplained fatigue syndrome: the score of 3 or more on the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI); and
- able to provide informed consent and effectively collect data.
You may not qualify if:
- diagnosed with cognitive dysfunction or other mental illnesses that may interfere with their completion of treatment;
- who are with a life expectancy \<3 months, or whose physical conditions are considered ineligible for the present study based on the physician's judgment; and
- who are receiving or have just completed other lung cancer-related intervention programs within the last six months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Xiangya Hospital Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Huiyuan LI
Chinese University of Hong Kong
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Cho Lee Wong, PhD
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The outcomes assessors who are independent with the research will be trained before formally conducting data collecting.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2021
First Posted
May 3, 2021
Study Start
July 1, 2021
Primary Completion
January 7, 2022
Study Completion
January 7, 2022
Last Updated
October 4, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share