the Value of Sensory Index in Trigeminal Neuralgia
The Value of Sensory Index in Predicting the Success of Radiofrequency Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Interventional therapies for Trigeminal Neuralgia are of variable efficacy and safety, and have different results for different periods of time before the recurrence of symptoms. Interventional therapy for TN is either destructive with trigeminal nerve sensory function destroyed intentionally or non-destructive with decompression of the trigeminal nerve and preservation of its regular function. The most common procedures in treating TN pain are the use of radiofrequency (RF). the aim of this study is to assess the possible value of motor index as a prediction of success of radiofrequency lesioning of the Gasserian ganglion during treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2021
CompletedNovember 8, 2021
November 1, 2021
5.5 years
April 25, 2021
November 1, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Motor index
Change of the visual analogue scale score, from 0 to 100 , where 100 means worst pain
2 weeks
Study Arms (1)
combined conventional and pulsed radiofrequency of trigeminal nerve nucleus
OTHERThe technique of the CCPRF is described as follows; 1. the classic Hartle technique is used to reach the Gasserian ganglion 2. Sensory stimulation with the RF equipment is conducted and parathesia of the affected branch is achieved at 0.1-0.2 V (50 Hz), keeping in mind that the mandibular part of the Gasserian ganglion is ventrolateral and the ophthalmic rootlets are postrolateral. Motor pre-stimulation (2 Hz) is achieved with masseter contraction at 0.1-0.3 V . 3. After sensory and motor stimulation, RF therapy is conducted by use of the RF generator , in the sequence: * Conventional RF 1st lesion at 60 °C for 60 s then 2nd lesion at 65°C for 60 seconds then 3rd lesion at 70°C for 60 seconds * Finally, PRF is applied for 360 second repeated at 45 V, with a pulse width of 10 ms and a pulse frequency of 4 Hz. The cut-off needle tip temperature is set at 42 °C. 4. Before withdrawal of needle 1 cc xylocaine 1% + 0.5 cc dexamethasone 4mg to be given .
Interventions
Patients with trigeminal neuralgia who underwent combined conventional and pulsed radiofrequency (CCPRF) for treatment of pain.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with trigeminal neuralgia, diagnosed in accordance with the International Headache Society (7) and with a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain of at least 7 or more for a minimum of 3 months before the intervention .
- Patients on a stable analgesic regimen for 2 weeks (consisting of at least two analgesics, including anticonvulsants) before the intervention .
- Patients examined by use of MRI/A of the brain to exclude secondary neuralgia.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with severe mental or psychiatric disorders
- Patients with history of drug abuse, high intracranial tension and history of MVD, SGK, balloon compression, RF treatment, or glycerol injection
- The possibility of vascular loop compression and other causes of TN
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Cancer Institute
Cairo, 11796, Egypt
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ehab H Shaker
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Anesthesia, intensive care and Pain releif
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2021
First Posted
April 29, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2014
Primary Completion
October 28, 2019
Study Completion
July 15, 2020
Last Updated
November 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
contacts personal details are not planned to be shared but the results can be shared after publication