Emergency Small vs Large Tube Thoracostomy in Chest Trauma Patients.
1 other identifier
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
To compare between small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube for the fear of obstruction (in hemomothorax) or ineffective drainage (in hemothorax, pneumothorax or hemo-pneumothorax) ,pain score or repositioning and need for thoracotomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2022
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
1 year
September 17, 2020
April 24, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To compare the number of patients who will have emergent small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube.
To compare the number of patients who will have emergent small sized tube thoracostomy and large sized tube thoracostomy regarding the need for another chest tube.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Number of trauma patients who will have emergent small vs large thoracostomy tube regarding pain score
baseline
Number of trauma patients who will have emergent small vs large thoracostomy tube regarding duration of tube insertion.
baseline
Study Arms (2)
Small sized chest tube
EXPERIMENTALInsertion of small sized chest tube in patients with traumatic hemothorax, pneumothorax or hemopneumothorax.
Large sized chest tube
ACTIVE COMPARATORinsertion of large sized chest tube in patients with traumatic hemothorax, pneumothorax or hemopneumothorax.
Interventions
insertion of intercostal tube for drainage of traumatic hemothorax or pneumothorax
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- all chest trauma patients with significant hemothorax, pneumothorax or combined hemo-pneumothorax
You may not qualify if:
- any chest trauma patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoracic surgery for any other reason for example : diaphragmatic tear,flail chest or sternal fracture
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (12)
Cooke DT, David EA. Large-bore and small-bore chest tubes: types, function, and placement. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013 Feb;23(1):17-24, v. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2012.10.006.
PMID: 23206714BACKGROUNDMeyer JA. Gotthard Bulau and closed water-seal drainage for empyema, 1875-1891. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Oct;48(4):597-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)66876-2.
PMID: 2679468BACKGROUNDVan Schil PE. Thoracic drainage and the contribution of Gotthard Bulau. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997 Dec;64(6):1876. No abstract available.
PMID: 9436605BACKGROUNDMonaghan SF, Swan KG. Tube thoracostomy: the struggle to the "standard of care". Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):2019-22. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.08.006.
PMID: 19022041BACKGROUNDHOWE BE Jr. Evaluation of chest suction with an artificial thorax. Surg Forum. 1951:1-7. No abstract available.
PMID: 14931188BACKGROUNDMiller KS, Sahn SA. Chest tubes. Indications, technique, management and complications. Chest. 1987 Feb;91(2):258-64. doi: 10.1378/chest.91.2.258. No abstract available.
PMID: 3542404BACKGROUNDFilosso PL, Sandri A, Guerrera F, Ferraris A, Marchisio F, Bora G, Costardi L, Solidoro P, Ruffini E, Oliaro A. When size matters: changing opinion in the management of pleural space-the rise of small-bore pleural catheters. J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(7):E503-10. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.06.25.
PMID: 27499983BACKGROUNDTanizaki S, Maeda S, Sera M, Nagai H, Hayashi M, Azuma H, Kano KI, Watanabe H, Ishida H. Small tube thoracostomy (20-22 Fr) in emergent management of chest trauma. Injury. 2017 Sep;48(9):1884-1887. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
PMID: 28673640BACKGROUNDRivera L, O'Reilly EB, Sise MJ, Norton VC, Sise CB, Sack DI, Swanson SM, Iman RB, Paci GM, Antevil JL. Small catheter tube thoracostomy: effective in managing chest trauma in stable patients. J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):393-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318173f81e.
PMID: 19204512BACKGROUNDTowards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 4: does size matter? Chest drains in haemothorax following trauma. Emerg Med J. 2013 Nov;30(11):965-7. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203139.4.
PMID: 24142946BACKGROUNDInaba K, Lustenberger T, Recinos G, Georgiou C, Velmahos GC, Brown C, Salim A, Demetriades D, Rhee P. Does size matter? A prospective analysis of 28-32 versus 36-40 French chest tube size in trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Feb;72(2):422-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182452444.
PMID: 22327984BACKGROUNDATLS Subcommittee; American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma; International ATLS working group. Advanced trauma life support (ATLS(R)): the ninth edition. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 May;74(5):1363-6. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828b82f5. No abstract available.
PMID: 23609291BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2020
First Posted
April 28, 2021
Study Start
September 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2022
Study Completion
December 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04