Evaluation of Asdzáán Be'eená Teen Pregnancy and Substance Use Prevention Program for Native American Youth and Their Caregiver
1 other identifier
interventional
408
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of this research study is to evaluate a culturally grounded program among American Indian (AI) female adolescents and their female caregivers. Specifically, investigators aim to evaluate the impact of "Asdzaan Be'eena'" or Female Pathways in English (henceforth referred to as AB) on risk and protective factors for early substance use and sexual debut through a randomized controlled trial (RCT) in partnership with the Navajo Nation. The program was developed and pilot tested through an extensive formative phase conducted by our tribal-academic partnership (IRB protocols: #00006569 and #00009117). Investigators will examine the efficacy of the AB program for reducing risk factors and improving protective factors associated with early substance use and sexual debut, with long term goals of reducing teen pregnancy and teen substance use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 29, 2025
CompletedOctober 2, 2025
October 1, 2025
4.4 years
April 13, 2021
October 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Change in youth reported parent-youth communication scale
Investigators will measure change in youth reported parent-youth communication from baseline and 6- and 12- months post program completion via 9-item communication assessment (5-point Likert scale \[0-Never; 4- Everyday). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in parent reported parent-youth communication scale
Investigators will measure change in parent reported parent-youth communication from baseline and 6- and 12- months post program completion via an 8-item communication assessment (5-point Likert scale \[0-Never; 4- Everyday). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in youth reported monitoring
Investigators will measure change in youth reported monitoring from baseline and 6- and 12- months post program completion via a 5-item parental monitoring assessment (5-point Likert scale \[0-Never; 4- Everyday). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in parent reported monitoring
Investigators will measure change in parent reported monitoring from baseline and 6- and 12- months post program completion via a 9-item parental monitoring assessment (5-point Likert scale \[0-Never; 4- Everyday). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in youth reported parental responsiveness
Investigators will measure change in youth reported parental responsiveness from baseline and 6- and 12- months post program completion via a 5-item authoritative parenting index (4-point Likert scale \[0-Not at all like her; 3- Just Like her). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in parent reported parental responsiveness
Investigators will measure change in parent reported parental responsiveness from baseline and 6- and 12- months post program completion via a 5-item authoritative parenting index (4-point Likert scale \[0-Not at all like her; 3- Just Like her). A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in proportion of youth who state they plan to delay having sexual intercourse until they graduate from high school
Change in proportion of youth who report they intend to delay sexual intercourse until they graduate from high school between individuals randomized to the AB program vs. those randomized to the control condition. Proportions will be measured from baseline to 6- and 12-months post program completion via one question. This is completed by the child (0-No; 1-Yes). A higher proportion indicates more youth intend to abstain from sex.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in proportion of youth who state they plan to engage in sexual intercourse while they are a teenager
Investigators will measure change in proportion of youth who report they intend to have sexual intercourse when they are a teenager between individuals randomized to the AB program vs. those randomized to the control condition. Proportions will be measured from baseline to 6- and 12-months post program completion via one question. This is completed by the child (0-No; 1- Yes). A higher proportion indicates more youth intend to have sex when they are a teenager. A higher proportion indicates a worse outcome.
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in mean score on externalizing and internalizing behaviors
Investigators will measure change in internalizing and externalizing behaviors between individuals randomized to the AB program vs. those randomized to the control condition. Change in internalizing/externalizing behaviors will be measured via the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment (ASEBA) completed by the caregiver (reporting on child behaviors) (3-point Likert Scale \[0-not true; 2-very true\]). A higher score across these variables indicates a worse outcome (i.e. higher (more) internalizing and externalizing behaviors).
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Change in caregiver parenting self-efficacy
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in caregiver parenting agency
Baseline and 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in mean score on healthy relationship skills
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in in youth future aspirations
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
Change in youth cultural connectedness
Baseline, 6- and 12-months post implementation
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe program consists of 11 weekly sessions conducted with girls ages 10-14 and their female caregivers. 5 of the 11 sessions will be taught to groups of 9-13 girls and their female caregivers, and 6 of the sessions will be taught to individual girl/female caregiver dyads. The choice to use a mix of group- and individual sessions is based on findings from the formative phase indicating certain topics should be taught in groups (e.g. Navajo history and reproductive health 101), and certain topics be taught in individual dyads (e.g. family values and the clan system).
Control
NO INTERVENTIONGirls and their female caregivers randomized to the control group will receive 4 retention incentives that are mailed to them monthly. These incentives will each be \<$10 per dyad, examples include: water bottles, lanyards, pencil cases and tote bags. The control condition was selected by community members and allows for minimal contamination and/or overlap between the AB curriculum and control group
Interventions
The program consists of 11 weekly sessions conducted with girls ages 10-14 and their female caregivers. 5 of the 11 sessions will be taught to groups of 9-13 girls and their female caregivers, and 6 of the sessions will be taught to individual girl/female caregiver dyads. The choice to use a mix of group- and individual sessions is based on findings from the formative phase indicating certain topics should be taught in groups (e.g. Navajo history and reproductive health 101), and certain topics be taught in individual dyads (e.g. family values and the clan system). Each of the sessions (group and individual) will be 60-90 minutes in duration and delivered by a trained Family Health Coach (FHC). Group sessions will take place at a local community center in a private room. Individual dyad sessions will take place in the girls'/female caregivers' home or another private place of their choosing, such as our local Johns Hopkins offices.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female \> 18 years of age
- Self-identify as Navajo
- Be a caregiver of a girl 10-14 years old who is available to enroll in the study
- Living within 50 miles of the Chinle, Arizona or Tuba City, Arizona Johns Hopkins program offices
- Willing to complete all assessments
- Willing to be randomized
- Speaks and reads English
- Not cognitively or visually impaired (able to complete assessments)
- Review and sign informed consent
- Female, 10-14 years old
- Have a caregiver enrolled in the study
- Living within 50 miles of the Chinle, Arizona or Tuba City, Arizona Johns Hopkins program offices
- Willing to be randomized
- Willing to complete all assessments
- Speaks and reads English
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Center for American Indian Health - Chinle
Chinle, Arizona, 86503, United States
Center for American Indian Health - Tuba City
Tuba City, Arizona, 86045, United States
Related Publications (1)
Chambers RA, Begay J, Patel H, Richards J, Nelson D, Rosenstock S, Huskon R, Mitchell K, Begay T, Tingey L. Rigorous evaluation of a substance use and teen pregnancy prevention program for American Indian girls and their female caregivers: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 21;21(1):1179. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11131-x.
PMID: 34154552DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lauren Tingey, PhD
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer Richards, PhD
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2021
First Posted
April 28, 2021
Study Start
May 20, 2021
Primary Completion
September 29, 2025
Study Completion
September 29, 2025
Last Updated
October 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10