Impact of Novel Thoracic Wall Blocks With Dexmetomidine on Inflammatory Markers Following Breast Cancer Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study will test the hypothesis that inflammatory markers measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery will be lower in patients receiving PECS II and PIFB blocks, supplemented with dexmetomidine compared to standard care group.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 28, 2021
September 1, 2021
2 years
April 21, 2021
September 27, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in NLR
Difference in neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between the intervention group and the standard care group measured at 24 hours after breast cancer surgery
24 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Markers of inflammation
24 hours after surgery
Intraoperative opioids
Duration of surgery
Pain after surgery
1,6,12,18,24 hours after surgery
Opioid consumption
24 hours
Other Outcomes (2)
Adverse effects
24 hours
Postsurgical pain
3 months after surgery
Study Arms (2)
Block group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in a Block group will be anesthetized and receive PECS II+PIFB with dexmetomidine prior to their surgery.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients in a Control group will receive a standard general anesthesia the same way as patients in the interventional group but without regional anesthesia.
Interventions
PECS II: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 20 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an interfascial plane between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscles followed by the needle withdrawal into an interfascial plane between the pectoralis major and pectoralis minor muscle where further 10ml will be administered. PIFB: Ultrasound guided block involving injection of 10 ml of 0.25% L-bupivacaine with dexmetomidine into an iterfascial plane between the pectoralis major and the intercostal muscles approximately 2 cm laterally from the sternum to cover T2 to T6 dermatomes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients with ductal carcinoma (stage 1 to 3) undergoing primary potentially curative unilateral mastectomy.
- Older than 18 years
- ASA I-III
You may not qualify if:
- Weight \< 50 kg
- BMI \> 35
- Allergy to local anaesthetic or dexmetomidine
- Contraindications to NSAIDs use
- Local infection over block site
- Coagulopathy
- Preexisting chronic pain
- Pregnancy
- Autoimmune disease
- Inability to give informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (19)
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26742998BACKGROUNDFecho K, Miller NR, Merritt SA, Klauber-Demore N, Hultman CS, Blau WS. Acute and persistent postoperative pain after breast surgery. Pain Med. 2009 May-Jun;10(4):708-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00611.x. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
PMID: 19453965BACKGROUNDAndersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011 Jul;12(7):725-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
PMID: 21435953BACKGROUNDLee SK, Choi MY, Bae SY, Lee JH, Lee HC, Kil WH, Lee JE, Kim SW, Nam SJ. Immediate postoperative inflammation is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer. Oncology. 2015;88(6):337-44. doi: 10.1159/000368985. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
PMID: 25721153BACKGROUNDDuff S, Connolly C, Buggy DJ. Adrenergic, Inflammatory, and Immune Function in the Setting of Oncological Surgery: Their Effects on Cancer Progression and the Role of the Anesthetic Technique in their Modulation. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2016 Fall;54(4):48-57. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0000000000000120. No abstract available.
PMID: 27648890BACKGROUNDFreise H, Van Aken HK. Risks and benefits of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Dec;107(6):859-68. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer339. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
PMID: 22058144BACKGROUNDKlein SM, Bergh A, Steele SM, Georgiade GS, Greengrass RA. Thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jun;90(6):1402-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200006000-00026.
PMID: 10825328BACKGROUNDKolawole IK, Adesina MD, Olaoye IO. Intercostal nerves block for mastectomy in two patients with advanced breast malignancy. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Mar;98(3):450-3.
PMID: 16573313BACKGROUNDBlanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
PMID: 22939099BACKGROUNDde la Torre PA, Garcia PD, Alvarez SL, Miguel FJ, Perez MF. A novel ultrasound-guided block: a promising alternative for breast analgesia. Aesthet Surg J. 2014 Jan 1;34(1):198-200. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13515902. No abstract available.
PMID: 24396082BACKGROUNDKulhari S, Bharti N, Bala I, Arora S, Singh G. Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Sep;117(3):382-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew223.
PMID: 27543533BACKGROUNDMarhofer P, Brummett CM. Safety and efficiency of dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to local anesthetics. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016 Oct;29(5):632-7. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000364.
PMID: 27258154BACKGROUNDFritsch G, Danninger T, Allerberger K, Tsodikov A, Felder TK, Kapeller M, Gerner P, Brummett CM. Dexmedetomidine added to ropivacaine extends the duration of interscalene brachial plexus blocks for elective shoulder surgery when compared with ropivacaine alone: a single-center, prospective, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;39(1):37-47. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000033.
PMID: 24317234BACKGROUNDXu L, Hu Z, Shen J, McQuillan PM. Efficacy of US-guided transversus abdominis plane block and rectus sheath block with ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine in elderly high-risk patients. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Jan;84(1):18-24. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11538-5. Epub 2017 May 19.
PMID: 28528536BACKGROUNDHanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013.
PMID: 21376230BACKGROUNDKoh CH, Bhoo-Pathy N, Ng KL, Jabir RS, Tan GH, See MH, Jamaris S, Taib NA. Utility of pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic factors in breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2015 Jun 30;113(1):150-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.183. Epub 2015 May 28.
PMID: 26022929BACKGROUNDKrenn-Pilko S, Langsenlehner U, Thurner EM, Stojakovic T, Pichler M, Gerger A, Kapp KS, Langsenlehner T. The elevated preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2014 May 13;110(10):2524-30. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.163. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
PMID: 24675383BACKGROUNDHu L, Li M, Ding Y, Pu L, Liu J, Xie J, Cabanero M, Li J, Xiang R, Xiong S. Prognostic value of RDW in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 28;8(9):16027-16035. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13784.
PMID: 27926498BACKGROUNDNi Eochagain A, Burns D, Riedel B, Sessler DI, Buggy DJ. The effect of anaesthetic technique during primary breast cancer surgery on neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio and return to intended oncological therapy. Anaesthesia. 2018 May;73(5):603-611. doi: 10.1111/anae.14207. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
PMID: 29457215RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tomas Hitka, MD
St. Elizabeth Cancer Institute
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Intervention will be done under general anesthesia so participant will be blinded and primary outcome which will be laboratory test will be assessed by a person not aware of intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2021
First Posted
April 26, 2021
Study Start
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 1, 2023
Study Completion
December 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share