The Effectiveness of a CA-CBI on Psychological Distress of University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Effectiveness of a Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention to Reducing Psychological Distress and Improving Well-Being Among University Students During the COVID-19 Pandemic
1 other identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The effectiveness study for Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention will be conducted with university students to measure if this intervention if effective for decreasing the university students' psychological distress and increase their well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Potential participants will be given an informed consent and included in a screening procedure to decide their eligibility. 100 participants (50 in experimental and 50 in control group-randomly assigned) who pass the screening procedure will be invited to the effectiveness study. The experimental group will receive an 8-session intervention while the control group will receive information about the freely available psychological support options. The measurements will be conducted three times; one week before, one week after and five weeks after the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 24, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 15, 2021
CompletedSeptember 7, 2023
August 1, 2023
21 days
April 22, 2021
September 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Comparison of changes of the Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10) over time
Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale is a 10-item scale that aims to measure the psychological distress. Each item is scored from 1 (none of the time) to 5 (all of the time) providing a range between 10 and 50. Higher scores indicate more severe psychological distress.
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Comparison of changes of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
Comparison of changes of the General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
Comparison of changes of the PTSD Checklist for The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 5 (DSM 5) (PCL-5) over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
Comparison of changes of the World Health Organization (Five) Well-Being Index (WHO-5) over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
Other Outcomes (3)
Comparison of changes of the Dispositional Hope Scale over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
Comparison of changes of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)]
8. Comparison of changes of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II) over time
Change from baseline (One week before the intervention) to follow-up assessment (13 weeks after the pre-assessment)
Study Arms (2)
Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CA-CBI)
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group will receive an 8-session CA-CBI in an online group format.
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control (care as usual) group will receive the information about freely available psychological support options. After all the measurements are completed, the control group will be able to receive CA-CBI, too.
Interventions
CA-CBI is an intervention based on Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CA-CBT) which was developed by Devon Hinton. This transdiagnostic intervention has a structured manual which can be culturally adapted and it will be used to decrease psychological distress and increase well-being by targeting cognitive and behavioral changes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being 18 years or above
- Being a university student
- Scoring 16 or above on Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
- Scoring 14 or belove on Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
You may not qualify if:
- Being older than 30 years
- Imminent suicidal risk
- Living outside of Turkey
- Having any type of psychiatric disorder
- Receiving any specialized psychological or psychiatric treatment at the time of application to the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Koç Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Koc University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
Hinton DE, Chhean D, Pich V, Safren SA, Hofmann SG, Pollack MH. A randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavior therapy for Cambodian refugees with treatment-resistant PTSD and panic attacks: a cross-over design. J Trauma Stress. 2005 Dec;18(6):617-29. doi: 10.1002/jts.20070.
PMID: 16382423BACKGROUNDHinton DE, Pham T, Tran M, Safren SA, Otto MW, Pollack MH. CBT for Vietnamese refugees with treatment-resistant PTSD and panic attacks: a pilot study. J Trauma Stress. 2004 Oct;17(5):429-33. doi: 10.1023/B:JOTS.0000048956.03529.fa.
PMID: 15633922BACKGROUNDHuang J, Nigatu YT, Smail-Crevier R, Zhang X, Wang J. Interventions for common mental health problems among university and college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Dec;107:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.09.018. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
PMID: 30300732BACKGROUNDVindegaard N, Benros ME. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Oct;89:531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048. Epub 2020 May 30.
PMID: 32485289BACKGROUNDCarlbring P, Andersson G, Cuijpers P, Riper H, Hedman-Lagerlof E. Internet-based vs. face-to-face cognitive behavior therapy for psychiatric and somatic disorders: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogn Behav Ther. 2018 Jan;47(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2017.1401115. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
PMID: 29215315BACKGROUNDCao W, Fang Z, Hou G, Han M, Xu X, Dong J, Zheng J. The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112934. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
PMID: 32229390BACKGROUNDAcarturk ZC, Abuhamdeh S, Jalal B, Unaldi N, Alyanak B, Cetinkaya M, Gulen B, Hinton D. Culturally adapted transdiagnostic CBT for SSRI resistant Turkish adolescents: A pilot study. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2019;89(2):222-227. doi: 10.1037/ort0000310. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
PMID: 29345479BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Ekin Çakır, PhD Student
Koç University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 22, 2021
First Posted
April 26, 2021
Study Start
June 24, 2021
Primary Completion
July 15, 2021
Study Completion
August 15, 2021
Last Updated
September 7, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share