Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Serum and Synovial Markers
DECISION
Diagnostic Accuracy and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Serum and Synovial Fluid Markers for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Joint Infections
1 other identifier
observational
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Total joint replacement (TJR) is an increasing effective procedure in orthopedics. However, TJR failure due to aseptic or septic loosening remains an important problem, often due to predisposing factors of the patient, which determine the need to perform a revision surgery. In light of the recent conclusions emerged on the still open problems concerning the diagnostic accuracy of serum and synovial fluid markers in the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI), the project aims at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of the combination of serum and/or synovial markers in the diagnosis of PJI. Through a diagnostic clinical study on patients hospitalized for revision surgery the project would provide evidences on the potentiality of the combination of some markers in accelerating the PJI diagnosis for the best selection of surgical strategy, choosing the suitable cutoff thresholds to mitigate the effect of some factors on markers' discriminatory capability.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Feb 2022
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 31, 2026
CompletedSeptember 22, 2025
September 1, 2025
3.4 years
April 8, 2021
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (15)
White blood cell count (WBC, cells/μL)
7 days
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, mm/hour)
7 days
C-reactive Protein (CRP, mg/L)
7 days
D-dimer (ng/ml)
7 days
IL-6 (pg/ml)
7 days
Procalcitonin (ng/ml)
2 months
Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (sICAM-1, ng/L)
7 days
Synovial WBC (sWBC, cells/μL)
7 days
Percentage of polymorphonucleates (%PMM, %) in synovial fluid
7 days
Synovial C-reactive Protein (sCRP, mg/L)
7 days
Synovial alpha-defensin (positive or negative)
7 days
Synovial leukocyte esterase (positive or negative)
7 days
Synovial IL-6 (pg/ml)
7 days
Synovial cathelicidin LL-37 (μg/ml)
7 days
Synovial calprotectin (ng/ml)
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Serum and synovial biomarkers cut-off for prosthetic joint infections
2 months
Assessment of antimicrobial resistances of isolated microrganisms
2 months
Assessment of biofilm formation capability of isolated microrganisms
2 months
Eligibility Criteria
A maximum number of n = 270 patients who will have to undergo hip or knee prosthetic revision surgery will be enrolled, of which n = 54 for late infection ascertained by previous microbiological analyzes, and n = 216 for prosthetic failure not from infection. Patients will be enrolled in the clinical study only after having signed and dated personally or by the patient's legal representative, the written informed consent. Therefore, enrollment in the study (exclusively of a diagnostic type) will not in any case influence the established diagnostic and therapeutic path.
You may qualify if:
- Patients requiring hip or knee replacement surgery: i) for 'late' joint prosthesis infection, present for at least 90 days from the date of the arthroplasty (first surgical phase); II) for non-infectious causes (mobilization, wear, instability, misalignment, adverse reactions to local tissues or other aseptic causes), also present for at least 90 days, and which have not had other re-operations on the same joint, and which will be a one-step review;
- Previous clinical data and laboratory and radiological examinations available.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients affected by 'early' joint prosthesis infection, with clinical symptom latency of less than 90 days (in this specific subset of patients there is in fact still considerable heterogeneity and little consensus about the diagnostic levels of white blood cell count and percentage of neutrophils).
- Patients suffering from joint prosthesis infection involving joints other than the hip or knee.
- Severe cognitive impairment or psychiatric disorders;
- Pregnant women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Bologna, 40134, Italy
Related Publications (19)
Pabinger C, Geissler A. Utilization rates of hip arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Jun;22(6):734-41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 26.
PMID: 24780823BACKGROUNDPabinger C, Lothaller H, Geissler A. Utilization rates of knee-arthroplasty in OECD countries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2015 Oct;23(10):1664-73. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 29.
PMID: 26028142BACKGROUNDBrochin RL, Phan K, Poeran J, Zubizarreta N, Galatz LM, Moucha CS. Trends in Periprosthetic Hip Infection and Associated Costs: A Population-Based Study Assessing the Impact of Hospital Factors Using National Data. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jul;33(7S):S233-S238. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.062. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
PMID: 29573912BACKGROUNDSchwarz EM, Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Aiyer A, Battenberg A, Brown SA, Callaghan JJ, Citak M, Egol K, Garrigues GE, Ghert M, Goswami K, Green A, Hammound S, Kates SL, McLaren AC, Mont MA, Namdari S, Obremskey WT, O'Toole R, Raikin S, Restrepo C, Ricciardi B, Saeed K, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Shohat N, Tan T, Thirukumaran CP, Winters B. 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions. J Orthop Res. 2019 May;37(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1002/jor.24293. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
PMID: 30977537BACKGROUNDBonanzinga T, Ferrari MC, Tanzi G, Vandenbulcke F, Zahar A, Marcacci M. The role of alpha defensin in prosthetic joint infection (PJI) diagnosis: a literature review. EFORT Open Rev. 2019 Jan 23;4(1):10-13. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180029. eCollection 2019 Jan.
PMID: 30800475BACKGROUNDKunutsor SK, Beswick AD, Peters TJ, Gooberman-Hill R, Whitehouse MR, Blom AW, Moore AJ. Health Care Needs and Support for Patients Undergoing Treatment for Prosthetic Joint Infection following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169068. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28046049BACKGROUNDOsmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Executive summary: diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Jan;56(1):1-10. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis966.
PMID: 23230301BACKGROUNDParvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the Workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Nov;469(11):2992-4. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9. No abstract available.
PMID: 21938532BACKGROUNDCats-Baril W, Gehrke T, Huff K, Kendoff D, Maltenfort M, Parvizi J. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: description of the consensus process. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Dec;471(12):4065-75. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3329-4. Epub 2013 Oct 24. No abstract available.
PMID: 24155178BACKGROUNDParvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1309-1314.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
PMID: 29551303BACKGROUNDHan X, Xie K, Jiang X, Wang L, Wu H, Qu X, Yan M. Synovial fluid alpha-defensin in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: the lateral flow test is an effective intraoperative detection method. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 28;14(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1320-9.
PMID: 31455372BACKGROUNDMarson BA, Deshmukh SR, Grindlay DJC, Scammell BE. Alpha-defensin and the Synovasure lateral flow device for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jun 1;100-B(6):703-711. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B6.BJJ-2017-1563.R1.
PMID: 29855233BACKGROUNDSuen K, Keeka M, Ailabouni R, Tran P. Synovasure 'quick test' is not as accurate as the laboratory-based alpha-defensin immunoassay: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):66-72. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0630.R1.
PMID: 29305453BACKGROUNDWouthuyzen-Bakker M, Ploegmakers JJW, Ottink K, Kampinga GA, Wagenmakers-Huizenga L, Jutte PC, Kobold ACM. Synovial Calprotectin: An Inexpensive Biomarker to Exclude a Chronic Prosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2018 Apr;33(4):1149-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
PMID: 29224989BACKGROUNDAlvand A, Rezapoor M, Parvizi J. The Role of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Implant-Related Infections in Orthopaedics and Trauma. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;971:69-79. doi: 10.1007/5584_2017_11.
PMID: 28243953BACKGROUNDParvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the International Consensus on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11):1450-2. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.33135.
PMID: 24151261BACKGROUNDDe Fine M, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Illuminati A, Terrando S, Pignatti G. The role of synovial fluid analysis in the detection of periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop. 2018 May;42(5):983-994. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3865-3. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
PMID: 29523955BACKGROUNDHajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PMID: 24582925BACKGROUNDMoreno et al., Bayesian Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Medical Treatments. Chapman and Hall/CRC 2019. ISBN 9781138731738
BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
Blood and synovial fluid specimen
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gianluca Giavaresi, MD
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2021
First Posted
April 26, 2021
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 17, 2025
Study Completion
March 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share