Study Stopped
Recruitment challenges for in-person visits of the affected population and a change in employment of the study team
Dose of Vestibular Rehabilitation for Vestibular Hypofunction
VRVR
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purposes of this research are to 1) utilize virtual reality (VR) to evaluate the exercise dose required to improve symptoms in those with vestibular (dizziness) disorders, 2) compare VR vestibular exercises to standard exercises, and 3) compare exercise performance outcomes to healthy controls without vestibular disorders. Even though more than 35% of those over 40, and \~50% of those who have had concussion have such symptoms, the dose of specific exercises targeted to improve symptoms is not well defined. In this study, the investigators will use a wireless VR device to measure key parameters and response to exercise. Another advantage of the VR device is the ability to control what the individual can see while performing the exercise. In normal daily life, moving objects and distracting backgrounds can make vestibular exercise too uncomfortable to perform. Using these methods, the investigators aim to determine the appropriate type and amount of exercise required for symptom improvement. This study will also compare the effectiveness of performing exercises in the virtual reality environment to standard physical therapy and to healthy persons without history of vestibular disorders. Three categories of vestibular disorders will be investigated with an instrumented and usual therapy group of 1) Unilateral hypofunction, 2) bilateral hypofunction, and 3) post-concussion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 17, 2025
CompletedDecember 17, 2025
December 1, 2025
3.4 years
April 11, 2021
September 3, 2025
December 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Dizziness Handicap Inventory
Final score on the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) is a 25-item questionnaire used to measure a patient's self-perceived impact of dizziness on their daily life, divided into physical, emotional, and functional subscales. In this study, only the total score (sum of subscales) was used. To score the DHI, each of the 25 questions is answered with "Yes" (4 points), "Sometimes" (2 points), or "No" (0 points), resulting in a total score from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a greater perceived handicap, a lower score indicates less perceived handicap. This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
Head Impulse Test at Final Assessment
Assessment of VOR-evoked gaze stability. The head impulse test (HIT) assesses the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) to detect peripheral vestibular dysfunction, or a weakened balance system in the inner ear. In the test, the examiner quickly rotates a patient's head while the patient tries to keep their eyes fixed on a target. A normal response involves the eyes staying fixed on the target, but an abnormal test shows the eyes moving away with the head and then quickly "catching up" with a corrective saccade, indicating the VOR isn't keeping up. Count of participants enrolled in the study are those with a positive clinical finding. This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale Final Assessment
This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
Functional Gait Assessment Final Assessment
This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB) Final Performance
This measure is assessed from 0 to 12 weeks in Intervention Arms; Assessed at a single Baseline timepoint for Healthy Controls.
Study Arms (3)
Usual Vestibular Rehabilitation Care
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm will perform typical PT in the clinic and home environment. They will be asked to keep a log to track their HEP.
Home Exercises Using Virtual Reality Device
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm will perform typical PT in the clinic, but will use the virtual reality device as part of their HEP.
Healthy Control
NO INTERVENTIONAge-matched healthy control subjects will perform all balance, gait, vestibular, and patient reported outcome measure assessments, including performing 30 seconds of each level of gaze stability exercise for an active comparison to outcomes obtained to those with vestibular disorders. The healthy-control group will only be assessed at baseline (a single visit).
Interventions
Participants will utilize a wireless virtual reality headset to perform their gaze stabilization exercises to better control the background and visual field as well as collect data related to speed, excursion, and duration of head movements.
Participants will perform gaze stabilization exercises in a non-instrumented manner. Subjects are instructed to focus on a letter on a piece of paper held at arm's length. They are instructed to move their head back and forth as quickly as they can while keeping the letter in focus. The total duration of the exercise (from 10 - 240 seconds) and background complexity (simple to complex moving) are increased gradually according to patient symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Known or suspected vestibular dysfunction
- Healthy volunteers without dizziness to serve as healthy control subjects
You may not qualify if:
- Previous cerebrovacular accident (stroke)
- Reported neurologic or oculuomotor disease
- Taking of medications that affect the vestibular or oculomotor system.
- Current symptoms of benign paroxysmal positional hypofunction
- Concussion occuring less than 7 days prior to enrollment in this study
- Currently pregnant, or plan to become pregnant during the timeline of the study
- Chronic kidney disease
- COPD
- Known coronary artery disease or cardiomyopathy
- immunocompromised state from a solid organ transplant
- Severe Obesity as defined by BMI of greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2
- Sickle cell disease
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The George Washington University, Department of Health, Human Function and Rehabilitation Science
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20006, United States
Related Publications (17)
Agrawal Y, Carey JP, Della Santina CC, Schubert MC, Minor LB. Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25;169(10):938-44. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.66.
PMID: 19468085BACKGROUNDSloane PD, Coeytaux RR, Beck RS, Dallara J. Dizziness: state of the science. Ann Intern Med. 2001 May 1;134(9 Pt 2):823-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-134-9_part_2-200105011-00005.
PMID: 11346317BACKGROUNDFlorence CS, Bergen G, Atherly A, Burns E, Stevens J, Drake C. Medical Costs of Fatal and Nonfatal Falls in Older Adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Apr;66(4):693-698. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15304. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
PMID: 29512120BACKGROUNDMurray DA, Meldrum D, Lennon O. Can vestibular rehabilitation exercises help patients with concussion? A systematic review of efficacy, prescription and progression patterns. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;51(5):442-451. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096081. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
PMID: 27655831BACKGROUNDKontos AP, Elbin RJ, Schatz P, Covassin T, Henry L, Pardini J, Collins MW. A revised factor structure for the post-concussion symptom scale: baseline and postconcussion factors. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Oct;40(10):2375-84. doi: 10.1177/0363546512455400. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
PMID: 22904209BACKGROUNDAlghadir AH, Iqbal ZA, Whitney SL. An update on vestibular physical therapy. J Chin Med Assoc. 2013 Jan;76(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcma.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Dec 26.
PMID: 23331774BACKGROUNDWhitney SL, Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Furman JM. The effect of age on vestibular rehabilitation outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2002 Oct;112(10):1785-90. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200210000-00015.
PMID: 12368616BACKGROUNDHall CD, Herdman SJ, Whitney SL, Cass SP, Clendaniel RA, Fife TD, Furman JM, Getchius TS, Goebel JA, Shepard NT, Woodhouse SN. Vestibular Rehabilitation for Peripheral Vestibular Hypofunction: An Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline: FROM THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION NEUROLOGY SECTION. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2016 Apr;40(2):124-55. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000120.
PMID: 26913496BACKGROUNDMcDonnell MN, Hillier SL. Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 13;1(1):CD005397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005397.pub4.
PMID: 25581507BACKGROUNDMantzoukas S. A review of evidence-based practice, nursing research and reflection: levelling the hierarchy. J Clin Nurs. 2008 Jan;17(2):214-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01912.x. Epub 2007 Apr 5.
PMID: 17419779BACKGROUNDCohen HS, Kimball KT. Increased independence and decreased vertigo after vestibular rehabilitation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Jan;128(1):60-70. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2003.23.
PMID: 12574761BACKGROUNDBergeron M, Lortie CL, Guitton MJ. Use of Virtual Reality Tools for Vestibular Disorders Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Analysis. Adv Med. 2015;2015:916735. doi: 10.1155/2015/916735. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
PMID: 26556560BACKGROUNDMicarelli A, Viziano A, Augimeri I, Micarelli D, Alessandrini M. Three-dimensional head-mounted gaming task procedure maximizes effects of vestibular rehabilitation in unilateral vestibular hypofunction: a randomized controlled pilot trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2017 Dec;40(4):325-332. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000244.
PMID: 28723718BACKGROUNDRosiak O, Krajewski K, Woszczak M, Jozefowicz-Korczynska M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Virtual Reality-based exercise program for Unilateral Peripheral Vestibular Deficit. J Vestib Res. 2018;28(5-6):409-415. doi: 10.3233/VES-180647.
PMID: 30714985BACKGROUNDAlahmari KA, Sparto PJ, Marchetti GF, Redfern MS, Furman JM, Whitney SL. Comparison of virtual reality based therapy with customized vestibular physical therapy for the treatment of vestibular disorders. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014 Mar;22(2):389-99. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2294904.
PMID: 24608691BACKGROUNDHillier SL, McDonnell M. Vestibular rehabilitation for unilateral peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Jun;36(3):248-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02309.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 21752206BACKGROUNDCohen HS, Gottshall KR, Graziano M, Malmstrom EM, Sharpe MH, Whitney SL; Barany Society Ad Hoc Committee on Vestibular Rehabilitation Therapy. International guidelines for education in vestibular rehabilitation therapy. J Vestib Res. 2011;21(5):243-50. doi: 10.3233/VES-2011-0424.
PMID: 22101295BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The intervention's effect cannot be determined because the study terminated early before recruiting adequate intervention groups.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Karen Goodman
- Organization
- George Washington University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen Goodman, DPT
The George Washington University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2021
First Posted
April 20, 2021
Study Start
March 22, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
September 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 17, 2025
Results First Posted
December 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share