Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex (CBOT) for Opioid Use Disorder
CBOT-OUD
Development and Evaluation of Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex Training (CBOT) for Opioid Use Disorder
2 other identifiers
interventional
190
1 country
4
Brief Summary
Opioid Use Disorders (OUD) cause significant burden to individuals, families, and the society. Our product - Computerized Chemosensory-Based Orbitofrontal Cortex Training (CBOT) - offers a cost-saving, home-based, user-friendly brain stimulation system that increased 6-month treatment retention of OUDs in a pilot study; and also, acutely reduced opioid withdrawal severity and negative affect during induction into opioid maintenance therapy. This study will establish its effectiveness in a broad category of OUD subjects at different stages of OUD care continuum.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Mar 2021
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 20, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedAugust 6, 2021
July 1, 2021
1.7 years
March 8, 2021
July 30, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (24)
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
2 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
4 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
6 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
8 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
10 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
12 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
14 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
16 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
18 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
20 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
22 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
24 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
26 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
28 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
30 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
32 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
34 weeks after baseline
6-month buprenorphine maintenance treatment (BMT) retention
6-month BMT retention is defined as missing two consecutive clinic visits after completing the first two weeks of BMT treatment, to allow for BUP dose stabilization. Ascertainment of retention is simply by tracking clinic visits and electronic record of the health visit.
36 weeks after baseline
Change from Screening in Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at week
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.
Screening to Week 12 Treatment
Change from Screening in Subjective Opiate Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) at Week 24
The SOWS is a self-administered scale for grading opioid withdrawal symptoms. It contains 16 symptoms whose intensity the patient rates on a scale of 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely), and takes less than 10 minutes to complete.
Screening to Week 24
Change from Screening in Opioid Craving Scale (OCS) at Week 12 severity rating measures over 1 month
he Opioid Craving Scale, a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.
Screening visit to Week 12
Change from Screening in Opioid Craving Scale (OCS) at Week 24 severity rating measures over 1 month
he Opioid Craving Scale, a modification of the Cocaine Craving Scale was used to measure opioid craving.
Screening visit to Week 24
Change from Screening in negative affect severity in the PANAS
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.
Screening visit to Week 12
Change from Screening in negative affect severity in the PANAS
The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) is the most widely and frequently used scale to assess positive and negative affect.
Screening visit to Week 24
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Opioid Relapse
Screening visit to Week 12
Pre-Intervention changes in SOWS from Screening at Week 2
Screening visit to Week 2
Post-Intervention changes in SOWS from Week 12 at Week 13
Week 12 to Week 13
Pre-Intervention changes in OCS from Screening to Week 2
Screening visit to Week 2
Post-Intervention changes in OCS from Week 12 to Week 13
Week 12 to Week 13
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
CBOT + TAU
EXPERIMENTALCBOT consists of 40 cycles of olfactory stimulation and OFC training tasks, lasting \~45 minutes, once daily over 3 months. Treatment-as-usual (TAU) is standard dosing of buprenorphine (BUP) to a median dose of 24 mg (range 16-32 mg).
Sham + TAU
SHAM COMPARATORSham is a CBOT device that uses artificially-scented compressed room air instead of olfactory stimulants and has no OFC cognitive tasks. Similar to the CBOT, sham will be used daily for 45 minutes. TAU is standard dosing of buprenorphine (BUP) to a median dose of 24 mg (range 16-32 mg).
Interventions
The CBOT with proprietary odorant molecules is designed to stimulate olfactory neural activity over long periods of time. It is paired with OFC-dependent cognitive tasks.
Sham CBOT device uses artificially scented compressed room air instead of olfactory stimulants and has control cognitive tasks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18- 70years
- Diagnosis of current moderate or severe OUD in the past 6 months, including the past one month
- Willing to receive study interventions and buprenorphine during the study
- Do not meet criteria for current moderate or severe use of other substance use disorders (except nicotine use disorder)
- Diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Anxiety disorders, and Post-traumatic Stress disorders will be included as long as the symptoms are stable, no suicidal ideas or plans and there are no recent changes in treatment of these conditions in the last 6 weeks prior to enrollment
- No intranasal disease
- Willing to participate by signing the informed consent form and
- Have a place to stay when receiving the intervention.
You may not qualify if:
- Any significant neurologic disease such as stroke, dementia, meningitis, neurosyphilis, cerebral palsy, encephalitis, epilepsy or seizures
- Mental retardation
- Schizophrenia or bipolar disorders
- Experiencing current suicide ideas or plans
- Any unstable medical condition such as uncontrolled hypertension, uncontrolled diabetes, and liver cirrhosis, as determined by site PI
- History of severe traumatic nose injury that affects ability to smell, as determined by site PI
- Allergies or intolerance to aromas from plant essential oils (e.g. orange and lemon)
- Breastfeeding or Pregnancy test positive.
- On parole or probation mandated to receive treatment for OUD.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Evon Medics LLClead
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)collaborator
- Howard Universitycollaborator
- Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inccollaborator
- Maryland Treatment Centers @ ARTCcollaborator
- Clinics of Dr. Edwin Chapman, MD, PC @ MHDGcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Clinics of Dr. Edwin Chapman @ MHDG
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20002, United States
Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20020, United States
Howard University
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20060, United States
Maryland Treatment Centers @ Avery Road Treatment Center
Rockville, Maryland, 20853, United States
Related Publications (5)
Jackson C, Rai N, McLean CK, Hipolito MMS, Hamilton FT, Kapetanovic S, Nwulia EA. Overlapping Risky Decision-Making and Olfactory Processing Ability in HIV-Infected Individuals. Clin Exp Psychol. 2017 Sep;3(3):160. doi: 10.4172/2471-2701.1000160. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
PMID: 29057388BACKGROUNDVolkow ND, Fowler JS. Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2000 Mar;10(3):318-25. doi: 10.1093/cercor/10.3.318.
PMID: 10731226BACKGROUNDLucantonio F, Takahashi YK, Hoffman AF, Chang CY, Bali-Chaudhary S, Shaham Y, Lupica CR, Schoenbaum G. Orbitofrontal activation restores insight lost after cocaine use. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Aug;17(8):1092-9. doi: 10.1038/nn.3763. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
PMID: 25042581BACKGROUNDTemple DM. Isolation techniques for pharmacologically active substances (animal). Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1969;9:407-18. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.09.040169.002203. No abstract available.
PMID: 4894805BACKGROUNDHummel T, Rissom K, Reden J, Hahner A, Weidenbecher M, Huttenbrink KB. Effects of olfactory training in patients with olfactory loss. Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):496-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.20101.
PMID: 19235739BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Evaristus A Nwulia, MD
Evon Medics LLC
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tanya Alim, MD
Howard University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Johnson, MD
Howard University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marc Fishman, MD
Maryland Treatment Centers
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Serlin, MD
Family and Medical Counseling Service, Inc
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edwin Chapman, MD
Clinics of Dr. Edwin C. Chapman, MD, PC @ MHDG
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chief Scientific Officer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2021
First Posted
April 20, 2021
Study Start
March 26, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
August 6, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share