NCT04846777

Brief Summary

Little is known about whether and how brief mindfulness therapies yield clinically beneficial effects. This gap exists despite the rapid growth of smartphone mindfulness applications and presence of mental health treatment gap. Specifically, no prior brief, smartphone mindfulness ecological momentary intervention (MEMI) has targeted generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Moreover, although theories propose that mindfulness intervention can boost attentional control (AC), executive functioning (EF), perspective-taking, and social cognition skills they have largely gone untested. Thus, this randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims to address these gaps by assessing the efficacy of a 14-day smartphone mindfulness EMI (vs. placebo). Participants with GAD will be randomly assigned to either MEMI or self-monitoring placebo (SMP). Those in treatment will exercise multiple core mindfulness strategies (open monitoring, acceptance, attending to small moments, slowed rhythmic diaphragmatic breathing). Also, those in MEMI will be reminded before bedtime that mindfulness is a lifelong practice. Comparatively, participants assigned to SMP will only be prompted to practice self-monitoring. They will notice their thoughts, rate any distress associated with them, and will not be taught any mindfulness strategies. All prompts will occur 5 times a day, for 14 consecutive days. They will complete self-reports and neuropsychological assessments at pre-, post-, and 1-month follow-up. Multilevel modeling analyses will determine if treatment (vs. self-monitoring placebo (SMP)) produces substantially larger reductions in trait worry and negative perseverative cognitions as well as steeper increases in AC and EF (inhibition, set-shifting, working memory updating). In addition, the investigators hypothesized that MEMI (vs. SMP) would lead to greater increases in performance-based and self-reported trait mindfulness, empathy, and perspective taking. Findings will advance understanding of the efficacy of unguided, technology-assisted, brief mindfulness in a clinical sample.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 14, 2018

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 9, 2021

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 15, 2021

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 26, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.7 years

First QC Date

April 9, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Ecological momentary interventionMindfulnessSelf-helpDigital healthMobile app

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change from Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Symptoms at 14-Day Post-Treatment

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV (GAD-Q-IV) with categorical ('Yes' for presence and 'No' for absence) and continuous response formats (0 = not at all to 8 = very severely) (Newman et al., 2002) (Item 1 to Item 14 self-report; possible range = 0-12). Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-Dimensional (Item 15 to Item 30) with consistent continuous 8-point Likert scale response formats that measures the frequency, intensity, uncontrollability, and degree of excessive worry (e.g., 0 = Always in control to 8 = Never in control) (Newman et al.) (possible range = 0-128). Larger reduction in score denote better outcome.

    Baseline to 14-Day Post-Treatment

  • Change from Baseline Generalized Anxiety Disorder Symptoms at 6-Week Post-Randomization

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV (GAD-Q-IV) with categorical ('Yes' for presence and 'No' for absence) and continuous response formats (0 = not at all to 8 = very severely) (Newman et al., 2002) (Item 1 to Item 14 self-report; possible range = 0-12). Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-Dimensional (Item 15 to Item 30) with consistent continuous 8-point Likert scale response formats that measures the frequency, intensity, uncontrollability, and degree of excessive worry (e.g., 0 = Always in control to 8 = Never in control) (Newman et al.) (possible range = 0-128). Larger reduction in score denote better outcome.

    Baseline to 6-Week Post-Randomization

  • Change from Baseline Perseverative Cognitions at 14-Day Post-Treatment

    The 45-item PCQ assessed perseverative cognitive traits linked to anxiety, depressive, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Respondents endorsed on a 6-point Likert scale (0 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Further, the PCQ-45 comprised six factors: dwelling on the past; expecting the worst; lack of controllability; thoughts discrepant with ideal self; preparing for the future; searching for causes and meanings. Additionally, the PCQ had strong two-week retest reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity (Szkodny \& Newman, 2019). A total score for PCQ was computed by summing the mean scores from each subscale (total possible score = 0-30). Larger reduction in score denote better outcome.

    Baseline to 14-Day Post-Treatment

  • Change from Baseline Perseverative Cognitions at 6-Week Post-Randomization

    The 45-item PCQ assessed perseverative cognitive traits linked to anxiety, depressive, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Respondents endorsed on a 6-point Likert scale (0 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Further, the PCQ-45 comprised six factors: dwelling on the past; expecting the worst; lack of controllability; thoughts discrepant with ideal self; preparing for the future; searching for causes and meanings. Additionally, the PCQ had strong two-week retest reliability, discriminant validity, and convergent validity (Szkodny \& Newman, 2019). A total score for PCQ was computed by summing the mean scores from each subscale (total possible score = 0-30). Larger reduction in score denote better outcome.

    Baseline to 6-Week Post-Randomization

Secondary Outcomes (18)

  • Change from Baseline Depression Symptom Severity at 14-Day Post-Treatment

    Baseline to 14-Day Post-Treatment

  • Change from Baseline Depression Symptom Severity at 6-Week Post-Randomization

    Baseline to 6-Week Post-Randomization

  • Change from Baseline Attentional Control at 14-Day Post-Treatment

    Baseline to 14-Day Post-Treatment

  • Change from Baseline Attentional Control at 6-Week Post-Randomization

    Baseline to 6-Week Post-Randomization

  • Change from Baseline Working Memory at 14-Day Post-Treatment

    Baseline to 14-Day Post-Treatment

  • +13 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Mental health disorder screening measures

    Baseline

Study Arms (2)

Mindfulness ecological momentary intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The SMP condition was developed to parallel the treatment while eliminating its theorized active therapeutic elements - open monitoring, acceptance, attending to small moments, breathing retraining, continual practice of mindfulness. Therefore, it did not mention anything about mindfulness at all. Instead, SMP participants were instructed to notice their cognitions and emotions and how distress they might be. No instruction on accepting their thoughts and feelings as they are were given.

Device: Mindfulness ecological momentary intervention

Self-monitoring placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

The SMP condition was developed to parallel the treatment while eliminating its theorized active therapeutic elements - open monitoring, acceptance, attending to small moments, breathing retraining, continual practice of mindfulness. Therefore, it did not mention anything about mindfulness at all. Instead, SMP participants were instructed to notice their cognitions and emotions and how distress they might be. No instruction on accepting their thoughts and feelings as they are were given.

Device: Self-monitoring placebo

Interventions

Access to a smartphone-delivered mindfulness ecological momentary intervention with the Personal Analytics Companion (PACO) app that regularly prompts participants to practice various mindfulness skills at 5 preset times each day.

Mindfulness ecological momentary intervention

Access to a smartphone-delivered self-monitoring placebo with the PACO app that regularly prompts participants to practice self-monitoring at 5 preset times each day.

Self-monitoring placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of Generalized Anxiety Disorder based on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV self-report and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview
  • Current student at the Pennsylvania State University or a community-dwelling adult who expressed interest to participate through the PSU StudyFinder portal
  • Expressed interest to seek treatment
  • Currently not receiving treatment from a mental health professional
  • Able to provide consent
  • Proficient in English

You may not qualify if:

  • Below age 18
  • Participant currently undergoing
  • Presence of suicidality, mania, psychosis, or substance use disorders

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Pennsylvania State University

University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Zainal NH, Newman MG. Who engages? Machine learning insights into digital mindfulness-based intervention for generalized anxiety disorder. J Affect Disord. 2025 Dec 19;399:120963. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.120963. Online ahead of print.

  • Zainal NH, Newman MG. Examining the Effects of a Brief, Fully Self-Guided Mindfulness Ecological Momentary Intervention on Empathy and Theory-of-Mind for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2024 May 24;11:e54412. doi: 10.2196/54412.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Anxiety DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Nur Hani Zainal, M.S.

    The Pennsylvania State University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Nur Hani Zainal, M.S.

CONTACT

Michelle G. Newman, Ph.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of Psychology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2021

First Posted

April 15, 2021

Study Start

November 14, 2018

Primary Completion

July 31, 2023

Study Completion

July 31, 2023

Last Updated

April 26, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations