Two is Better Than One: A Novel Venous Access System for Intermittent Apheresis
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: To describe a novel configuration of venous access for the performance of intermittent apheresis. Participants: 20 participants at UNC who were referred for change from a vortex port to a powerflow port. Procedures (methods): Placement of one of two configurations of the powerflow port and follow up visits between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2023.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 26, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 14, 2023
CompletedMay 11, 2023
May 1, 2023
1.9 years
April 13, 2021
May 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in Flow Rate
The study will compare mean change flow rate for pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations by averaging the flow rate for up to 5 sessions using the new port configuration.
1 year following new port configuration placement
Change in Procedure Time
The study will compare mean change in procedure time for pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations.
1 year following new port configuration placement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Change in Use of Tissue Plasminogen Activator
1 year following new port configuration placement
Study Arms (1)
PowerPort Subjects
This study will involve a chart review of patients at UNC who were referred for change from a vortex port to a powerflow port.
Interventions
The study will compare pheresis sessions with the old system versus pheresis sessions with one of two new configurations.
Eligibility Criteria
A total of 20 adults will be enrolled to this study. The study subjects will be recruited from adults who are scheduled to receive or have received a PowerFlow™ Implantable Apheresis IV Port in Vascular Interventional Radiology for their clinical care.
You may qualify if:
- Over the age of 18 years of age.
- Referred for change from a vortex port to a powerflow port.
- Previously placed or scheduled placement of one of two configurations of the PowerFlow port
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to read and understand English.
- Unable to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Related Publications (1)
Howlett MS, Hicks K, Park Y, Karafin MS, Bream PR Jr. Use of a novel configuration of ports for patients needing intermittent long-term apheresis. J Clin Apher. 2024 Aug;39(4):e22143. doi: 10.1002/jca.22143.
PMID: 39105402DERIVED
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Bream, MD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2021
First Posted
April 15, 2021
Study Start
May 26, 2021
Primary Completion
April 14, 2023
Study Completion
April 14, 2023
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 9 to 36 months following publication
- Access Criteria
- The investigator who proposes to use the data has received IRB, IEC, or REB approval, as applicable, and an executed data use/sharing agreement with UNC.
Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.