Complementary and Alternative Medicine Interventions in Targeting Pain
CAMP
1 other identifier
interventional
128
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial aimed at determining the effectiveness of a modified RR intervention in reducing post-operative pain and psychological symptoms in patients undergoing surgery intervention. Researches hypothesized that compared to controls patients undergoing modified RR intervention were characterized by
- 1.improved capability to discriminate emotions from bodily feelings;
- 2.reduce emotional distress;
- 3.reduced pain perception.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2021
CompletedJuly 28, 2021
July 1, 2021
2.4 years
February 3, 2021
July 21, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Changes in alexithymia (TAS scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention
Changes in the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) scores following a specific short psychocorporeal intervention * Total score. Range: 20-100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (TAS-DIF). Range: 7-35. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Difficulty in Describing Feelings (TAS-DDF). Range: 5-25. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Externally Oriented Thinking (TAS-EOT). Range: 8-40. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge, assessed up to 10 days; 3 months after the surgical intervention
Changes in anxiety and depression (HADS scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention
Changes in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention. * Anxiety score. Range: 0-21. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Depression score. Range: 0-21. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
[Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]
Changes in post-traumatic distress (IES-R scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention
Changes in the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention * Total score. Range: 0-88. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Hyperarousal subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Avoidance subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Intrusion subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
[Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]
Changes in pain intensity perception (NRS scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention
Changes in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention • Total score. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
[Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]
Changes in psychological distress (ET scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention
Changes in the Emotion Thermometer (ET) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention * Distress scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Anxiety scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Depression scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Anger scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Need for help scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.
[Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Effectiveness of the short psycho-corporeal intervention in reducing the use of analgesic drugs.
[Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]
Study Arms (2)
Clinical RR intervention
EXPERIMENTALClinical RR intervention
Standard care
NO INTERVENTIONStandard care
Interventions
The short psychological intervention consists of a narrative interview and a psychocorporeal intervention. Narrative interview: this is an interview aimed at exploring the experience and awareness of illness. The sharing of the dimension of pain and suffering, the verbalization of emotions, the narration of the history of illness, expectations and fears related to the intervention will be aimed at an emotional and cognitive restructuring of the experience of illness, improving the perception of internal resources and resilience. Psycho-corporeal intervention:it is a training to the psychophysiological technique of the "Relaxation Response" (R.R.) of Hebert Benson (Mind-Body Medical Institute of Havard), aimed at stress management and consequently at reducing the perception of pain
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients waiting for a surgical intervention in the Departments of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery and Neurosurgery;
- age ≥ 18 years.
You may not qualify if:
- having a poor knowledge of the Italian language;
- having a cognitive impairment;
- having a certified psychiatric diagnosis;
- having a certified diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease (i.e., Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, etc.)
- having been in psychiatric or psychological therapy in the last 6 months
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (23)
Benson H, Beary JF, Carol MP. The relaxation response. Psychiatry. 1974 Feb;37(1):37-46. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1974.11023785. No abstract available.
PMID: 4810622BACKGROUNDCasey A, Chang BH, Huddleston J, Virani N, Benson H, Dusek JA. A model for integrating a mind/body approach to cardiac rehabilitation: outcomes and correlators. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):230-8; quiz 239-40. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a33352.
PMID: 19451830BACKGROUNDCaumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, Bergmann J, Iwamoto CW, Adamatti LC, Bandeira D, Ferreira MB. Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Nov;46(10):1265-71. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.461015.x.
PMID: 12421200BACKGROUNDChang BH, Casey A, Dusek JA, Benson H. Relaxation response and spirituality: Pathways to improve psychological outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Aug;69(2):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.
PMID: 20624507BACKGROUNDGlaros AG, Lumley MA. Alexithymia and pain in temporomandibular disorder. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Aug;59(2):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.05.007.
PMID: 16186003BACKGROUNDHonkalampi K, Hintikka J, Laukkanen E, Lehtonen J, Viinamaki H. Alexithymia and depression: a prospective study of patients with major depressive disorder. Psychosomatics. 2001 May-Jun;42(3):229-34. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.3.229.
PMID: 11351111BACKGROUNDHorowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004.
PMID: 472086BACKGROUNDLumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M, Nathanson LK, Siu S, Stitz RW. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02068069.
PMID: 8620781BACKGROUNDTuzer V, Bulut SD, Bastug B, Kayalar G, Goka E, Bestepe E. Causal attributions and alexithymia in female patients with fibromyalgia or chronic low back pain. Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;65(2):138-44. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2010.522596. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
PMID: 20874000BACKGROUNDVillemure C, Bushnell CM. Cognitive modulation of pain: how do attention and emotion influence pain processing? Pain. 2002 Feb;95(3):195-199. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00007-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 11839418BACKGROUNDBagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.
PMID: 8126686BACKGROUNDBagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD. The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-x.
PMID: 8126688BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDOlsson I, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale: a cross-sectional study of psychometrics and case finding abilities in general practice. BMC Psychiatry. 2005 Dec 14;5:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-46.
PMID: 16351733BACKGROUNDCraparo G, Faraci P, Rotondo G, Gori A. The Impact of Event Scale - Revised: psychometric properties of the Italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1427-32. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S51793. Epub 2013 Sep 19.
PMID: 24092980BACKGROUNDMcCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988 Nov;18(4):1007-19. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009934.
PMID: 3078045BACKGROUNDJensen MP, Moore MR, Bockow TB, Ehde DM, Engel JM. Psychosocial factors and adjustment to chronic pain in persons with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jan;92(1):146-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.021.
PMID: 21187217BACKGROUNDJensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993 Nov;55(2):195-203. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-I.
PMID: 8309709BACKGROUNDRodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001 Jun;2(2):38-46. doi: 10.1053/jpmn.2001.23746.
PMID: 11706769BACKGROUNDJohnson C. Measuring Pain. Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Pain Scale: What is the Difference? J Chiropr Med. 2005 Winter;4(1):43-4. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60112-8.
PMID: 19674646BACKGROUNDMitchell AJ, Morgan JP, Petersen D, Fabbri S, Fayard C, Stoletniy L, Chiong J. Validation of simple visual-analogue thermometer screen for mood complications of cardiovascular disease: the Emotion Thermometers. J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):1257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PMID: 21723618BACKGROUNDSchubart JR, Mitchell AJ, Dietrich L, Gusani NJ. Accuracy of the Emotion Thermometers (ET) screening tool in patients undergoing surgery for upper gastrointestinal malignancies. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2014.977415.
PMID: 25396697BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Antonella Granieri, Professor
Dipartimento di Psicologia dell'Università degli Studi di Torino
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Fanny Guglielmucci, PhD
Dipartimento di Psicologia dell'Università degli Studi di Torino
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 3, 2021
First Posted
April 14, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2017
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
July 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share