NCT04845334

Brief Summary

This Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial aimed at determining the effectiveness of a modified RR intervention in reducing post-operative pain and psychological symptoms in patients undergoing surgery intervention. Researches hypothesized that compared to controls patients undergoing modified RR intervention were characterized by

  1. 1.improved capability to discriminate emotions from bodily feelings;
  2. 2.reduce emotional distress;
  3. 3.reduced pain perception.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2015

Typical duration for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2015

Completed
2.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2017

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 3, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

February 3, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Relaxation responseSurgiva stressPainDistressEmotion regulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Changes in alexithymia (TAS scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention

    Changes in the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) scores following a specific short psychocorporeal intervention * Total score. Range: 20-100. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Difficulty in Identifying Feelings (TAS-DIF). Range: 7-35. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Difficulty in Describing Feelings (TAS-DDF). Range: 5-25. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Externally Oriented Thinking (TAS-EOT). Range: 8-40. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge, assessed up to 10 days; 3 months after the surgical intervention

  • Changes in anxiety and depression (HADS scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention

    Changes in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention. * Anxiety score. Range: 0-21. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Depression score. Range: 0-21. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    [Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]

  • Changes in post-traumatic distress (IES-R scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention

    Changes in the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention * Total score. Range: 0-88. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Hyperarousal subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Avoidance subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Intrusion subscale. Range: 0-4. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    [Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]

  • Changes in pain intensity perception (NRS scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention

    Changes in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention • Total score. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    [Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]

  • Changes in psychological distress (ET scores) following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention

    Changes in the Emotion Thermometer (ET) scores following a specific short psycho-corporeal intervention * Distress scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Anxiety scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Depression scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Anger scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. * Need for help scale. Range: 0-10. Higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    [Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Effectiveness of the short psycho-corporeal intervention in reducing the use of analgesic drugs.

    [Time Frame: Baseline; The morning before the surgical intervention; At discharge from the hospital, up to 10 days after the intervention; 3 months after the surgical intervention]

Study Arms (2)

Clinical RR intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical RR intervention

Behavioral: RR intervention

Standard care

NO INTERVENTION

Standard care

Interventions

RR interventionBEHAVIORAL

The short psychological intervention consists of a narrative interview and a psychocorporeal intervention. Narrative interview: this is an interview aimed at exploring the experience and awareness of illness. The sharing of the dimension of pain and suffering, the verbalization of emotions, the narration of the history of illness, expectations and fears related to the intervention will be aimed at an emotional and cognitive restructuring of the experience of illness, improving the perception of internal resources and resilience. Psycho-corporeal intervention:it is a training to the psychophysiological technique of the "Relaxation Response" (R.R.) of Hebert Benson (Mind-Body Medical Institute of Havard), aimed at stress management and consequently at reducing the perception of pain

Clinical RR intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients waiting for a surgical intervention in the Departments of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery and Neurosurgery;
  • age ≥ 18 years.

You may not qualify if:

  • having a poor knowledge of the Italian language;
  • having a cognitive impairment;
  • having a certified psychiatric diagnosis;
  • having a certified diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease (i.e., Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, etc.)
  • having been in psychiatric or psychological therapy in the last 6 months

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (23)

  • Benson H, Beary JF, Carol MP. The relaxation response. Psychiatry. 1974 Feb;37(1):37-46. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1974.11023785. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4810622BACKGROUND
  • Casey A, Chang BH, Huddleston J, Virani N, Benson H, Dusek JA. A model for integrating a mind/body approach to cardiac rehabilitation: outcomes and correlators. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 Jul-Aug;29(4):230-8; quiz 239-40. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a33352.

    PMID: 19451830BACKGROUND
  • Caumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, Bergmann J, Iwamoto CW, Adamatti LC, Bandeira D, Ferreira MB. Preoperative predictors of moderate to intense acute postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Nov;46(10):1265-71. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.461015.x.

    PMID: 12421200BACKGROUND
  • Chang BH, Casey A, Dusek JA, Benson H. Relaxation response and spirituality: Pathways to improve psychological outcomes in cardiac rehabilitation. J Psychosom Res. 2010 Aug;69(2):93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.01.007. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

    PMID: 20624507BACKGROUND
  • Glaros AG, Lumley MA. Alexithymia and pain in temporomandibular disorder. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Aug;59(2):85-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.05.007.

    PMID: 16186003BACKGROUND
  • Honkalampi K, Hintikka J, Laukkanen E, Lehtonen J, Viinamaki H. Alexithymia and depression: a prospective study of patients with major depressive disorder. Psychosomatics. 2001 May-Jun;42(3):229-34. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.3.229.

    PMID: 11351111BACKGROUND
  • Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979 May;41(3):209-18. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004.

    PMID: 472086BACKGROUND
  • Lumley JW, Fielding GA, Rhodes M, Nathanson LK, Siu S, Stitz RW. Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Feb;39(2):155-9. doi: 10.1007/BF02068069.

    PMID: 8620781BACKGROUND
  • Tuzer V, Bulut SD, Bastug B, Kayalar G, Goka E, Bestepe E. Causal attributions and alexithymia in female patients with fibromyalgia or chronic low back pain. Nord J Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;65(2):138-44. doi: 10.3109/08039488.2010.522596. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

    PMID: 20874000BACKGROUND
  • Villemure C, Bushnell CM. Cognitive modulation of pain: how do attention and emotion influence pain processing? Pain. 2002 Feb;95(3):195-199. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00007-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 11839418BACKGROUND
  • Bagby RM, Parker JD, Taylor GJ. The twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--I. Item selection and cross-validation of the factor structure. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90005-1.

    PMID: 8126686BACKGROUND
  • Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD. The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale--II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):33-40. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(94)90006-x.

    PMID: 8126688BACKGROUND
  • Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.

    PMID: 6880820BACKGROUND
  • Olsson I, Mykletun A, Dahl AA. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale: a cross-sectional study of psychometrics and case finding abilities in general practice. BMC Psychiatry. 2005 Dec 14;5:46. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-5-46.

    PMID: 16351733BACKGROUND
  • Craparo G, Faraci P, Rotondo G, Gori A. The Impact of Event Scale - Revised: psychometric properties of the Italian version in a sample of flood victims. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2013;9:1427-32. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S51793. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

    PMID: 24092980BACKGROUND
  • McCormack HM, Horne DJ, Sheather S. Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med. 1988 Nov;18(4):1007-19. doi: 10.1017/s0033291700009934.

    PMID: 3078045BACKGROUND
  • Jensen MP, Moore MR, Bockow TB, Ehde DM, Engel JM. Psychosocial factors and adjustment to chronic pain in persons with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Jan;92(1):146-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.021.

    PMID: 21187217BACKGROUND
  • Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain. 1993 Nov;55(2):195-203. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(93)90148-I.

    PMID: 8309709BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain Manag Nurs. 2001 Jun;2(2):38-46. doi: 10.1053/jpmn.2001.23746.

    PMID: 11706769BACKGROUND
  • Johnson C. Measuring Pain. Visual Analog Scale Versus Numeric Pain Scale: What is the Difference? J Chiropr Med. 2005 Winter;4(1):43-4. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60112-8.

    PMID: 19674646BACKGROUND
  • Mitchell AJ, Morgan JP, Petersen D, Fabbri S, Fayard C, Stoletniy L, Chiong J. Validation of simple visual-analogue thermometer screen for mood complications of cardiovascular disease: the Emotion Thermometers. J Affect Disord. 2012 Feb;136(3):1257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

    PMID: 21723618BACKGROUND
  • Schubart JR, Mitchell AJ, Dietrich L, Gusani NJ. Accuracy of the Emotion Thermometers (ET) screening tool in patients undergoing surgery for upper gastrointestinal malignancies. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2014.977415.

    PMID: 25396697BACKGROUND
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.

    PMID: 17695343BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Carotid StenosisAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalPainEmotional Regulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carotid Artery DiseasesCerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesArterial Occlusive DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesAortic AneurysmAneurysmAortic DiseasesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSelf-ControlSocial BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Antonella Granieri, Professor

    Dipartimento di Psicologia dell'Università degli Studi di Torino

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Fanny Guglielmucci, PhD

    Dipartimento di Psicologia dell'Università degli Studi di Torino

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2021

First Posted

April 14, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion

June 1, 2017

Study Completion

June 1, 2017

Last Updated

July 28, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share