NCT04844567

Brief Summary

The present COVID-19 Virtual Reality (COVVR) clinical study is performed to test the hypothesis that an immersive virtual reality (iVR)-based Digital Therapeutics (DTx), would alleviate dyspnea by improving breathing comfort in patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia presenting with persistent dyspnea. We will further evaluate participants' perceived awareness of and agency over their breathing movements. Finally, we will track patients' perceived benefits related to the iVR intervention and the feasibility of using COVVR in the clinic or at home.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable covid19

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2020

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable covid19

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 26, 2020

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 18, 2021

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 6, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 6, 2021

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 14, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Status Verified

March 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 18, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 1, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Efficacy (Breathing Comfort & Discomfort)

    Efficacy will be evaluated based on subjective feedback by the patients regarding their breathing comfort and discomfort, depending on the intervention. Subjective ratings will be measured using a 7-point Likert scale with -3 = Strongly disagree, -2 = Disagree; -1 = Somewhat disagree; 0 = Neither agree nor disagree; 1 = Somewhat agree; 2 = Agree; 3= Strongly agree. Comfort item: "My breathing was enjoyable" Discomfort item: "I had difficulty breathing"

    through study completion, an average of one year

  • VR Intervention Feasibility

    Feasibility will be evaluated using a feedback questionnaire, alongside open feedback. Agreement with the questionnaire items indicates better feasibility, acceptance, and perceived outcome. Ratings will be measured using a 7-point Likert scale with -3 = Strongly disagree, -2 = Disagree; -1 = Somewhat disagree; 0 = Neither agree nor disagree; 1 = Somewhat agree; 2 = Agree; 3= Strongly agree. Satisfaction: Did you enjoy the VR experience? Rehabilitation: Would you like to continue using the device during your recovery? Hospital Use: Would you have liked to use this earlier during your stay at the hospital? Home Use: Would you like to continue using the device at home? Respiratory benefit: Do you think the VR feedback improved your breathing? Well-being benefit: Did the VR feedback make you feel better?

    through study completion, an average of one year

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Embodiment

    through study completion, an average of one year

  • Respiratory Rate

    through study completion, an average of one year

  • Respiratory Rate Variability

    through study completion, an average of one year

Study Arms (2)

COVVR_A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the COVVR\_A arm complete the synchronous block first, followed by the asynchronous block.

Device: COVVR_SynchDevice: COVVR_Asynch

COVVR_B

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the COVVR\_B arm complete the asynchronous block first, followed by the synchronous block.

Device: COVVR_SynchDevice: COVVR_Asynch

Interventions

Participants wear a respiration belt (Vernier, Go Direct) that continuously transmits thoracic circumference readings to a mobile phone (Samsung Galaxy S8) in real-time. The mobile device is placed in a headset (Zeiss VR ONEPLUS) and used to create a stereoscopic, immersive scene in Virtual Reality. The data from the respiration belt is used to map the on-going respiration pattern onto a virtual body in the scene in one of two feedback conditions. COVVR\_Synch provided synchronous feedback: participants receive real-time feedback of their respiration.

COVVR_ACOVVR_B

Participants wear a respiration belt (Vernier, Go Direct) that continuously transmits thoracic circumference readings to a mobile phone (Samsung Galaxy S8) in real-time. The mobile device is placed in a headset (Zeiss VR ONEPLUS) and used to create a stereoscopic, immersive scene in Virtual Reality. The data from the respiration belt is used to map the on-going respiration pattern onto a virtual body in the scene in one of two feedback conditions. COVVR\_Asynch provided asynchronous feedback: participants receive asynchronous, frequency modulated feedback of their respiration.

COVVR_ACOVVR_B

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2
  • Being able to give consent
  • Being able to understand and speak French or English

You may not qualify if:

  • Any unstable respiratory, neurological, and cardiac conditions
  • Any psychiatric illness
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score below 25.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve (HUG)

Geneva, 1205, Switzerland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

COVID-19Dyspnea

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pneumonia, ViralPneumoniaRespiratory Tract InfectionsInfectionsVirus DiseasesCoronavirus InfectionsCoronaviridae InfectionsNidovirales InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesRespiration DisordersSigns and Symptoms, RespiratorySigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Olaf Blanke, Prof

    Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Participants are naïve to the difference in interventions. Allocation was concealed to the care provider screening participants.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants perform both conditions. Condition order was randomised across participants using a script prior to data collection.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2021

First Posted

April 14, 2021

Study Start

November 26, 2020

Primary Completion

April 6, 2021

Study Completion

April 6, 2021

Last Updated

March 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations