Efficacy of Combination Taping Technique vs Ankle Foot Orthosis on Improving Gait Parameters in Cerebral Palsy
Short Term Efficacy of Combination Taping Technique as an Alternative to Ankle Foot Orthosis on Improving Gait Parameters in Spastic Cerebral Palsy: A Controlled Randomized Study
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gait in children with spastic CP is often characterized by abnormal gait kinematics as knee flexion and equines foot which associated with such gait deviations, an elevated walking energy cost is often observed which may contribute to activity limitations. The ability to maintain proper joint alignment of the lower extremity, and control the position of the foot in standing and walking is a critical treatment objective for gait in children with cerebral palsy. Lower extremity orthoses, such as ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are widely recommended in children with spastic cerebral palsy to prevent the development or progression of this deformity and to improve the dynamic efficiency of the child's gait. The use of Kinesio taping in pediatric rehabilitation becomes increasingly popular in recent years. Recent systematic reviews reported moderate evidence that Kinesiology taping is a useful adjunct to physiotherapy intervention in higher functioning children with CP. Combination tapings is a technique first introduced by Kenzo Kase, in which Kinesio taping is coupled with the rigid athletic tape to maximize the treatment benefits. This approach remains briefly addressed in the literature with no prior studies has examined the effects of combination tapings in the CP pediatric population. Hypothesis: there is no difference between the effect of combining tapings and ankle-foot orthosis on spatiotemporal gait parameters in spastic cerebral palsied
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 31, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2021
CompletedApril 14, 2021
April 1, 2021
2 months
March 31, 2021
April 11, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Step Length (cm)
Change of the step length was measured using GAITRite System
4 Weeks
Stride Length (cm)
Change of the stride length was measured using GAITRite System
4 Weeks
Velocity (cm/s)
Change of the velocity was measured using GAITRite System
4 weeks
Cadence (step/min)
Change of the cadence was measured using GAITRite System
4 weeks
Single leg support (% of gait cycle)
Change of the single leg support was measured using GAITRite System
4 weeks
Double leg support (% of gait cycle)
Change of the double leg support was measured using GAITRite System
4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORChildren in this group received conventional physical therapy program in form of Stretching for tight muscles, weak muscles Strengthening, Postural reactions training, Proprioceptive training, and Walking training were all part of the treatment plan, which was based on the neurodevelopmental approach.
AFO Group
EXPERIMENTALChildren in this group received the same conventional treatment plus they were provided with solid community-prescribed AFO with a wearing schedule of 6-12 hours per day. Parents were given a detailed demonstration about how to use the AFO probably and watching for areas of skin overpressure. AFO needs to be worn with a smooth, long sock underneath with the child's heel is right down in the AFO with the ankle strap and/or shoe fastened firmly.
Combination Taping Group
EXPERIMENTALChildren in this group received the same conventional treatment plus the combination taping technique, which was performed by one qualified physical therapist with over five years of experience. The technique started with the application of two 5-cm wide Kinesio tape "I" straps. The first strap was applied from the lateral condyle of the tibia to the base of the first metatarsal bone with the ankle joint in plantar flexion. The tape was not stretched for 5 cm from the initial site and was then stretched up to 30% for the remaining parts15. The second "I" strap While the therapist holds the ankle in dorsiflexion, he applied the distal end of the tape 10 cm below the ankle joint. With almost 70% tension, the proximal end is applied 10 cm above the ankle joint. While one hand was holding each end of the tape, the child was asked to move the joint into plantar flexion. Finally, both hands moved towards the middle of the joint to apply the remaining tape.
Interventions
Stretching for tight muscles, weak muscles Strengthening, Postural reactions training, Proprioceptive training, and Walking training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age range from 8 to 15 years old
- Able to stand and walk independently
- Spasticity ranged from 1 to 1+ grade according to Modified Ashworth Scale
- level I or II according to Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
- Able to understand and follow instructions
You may not qualify if:
- Children with previous corrective orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin injection in the lower extremities within the previous 6 months
- Skin disease
- Epilepsy
- Mental retardation
- Visual or auditory problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Batterjee Medical Collegelead
- Taif Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Fizik Center For Physiotherapy
Jeddah, 23521, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohamed M. Abdel Ghafar, Ph.D
Batterjee Medical College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 31, 2021
First Posted
April 9, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
March 15, 2021
Study Completion
March 30, 2021
Last Updated
April 14, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share