Comparing Sevoflurane With Propofol Sedation in ESRF Patients
A Comparative Study of Sevoflurane Sedation With TCI Propofol Sedation in Dialysis Dependent End Stage Renal Failure Patients for Transposition of Brachiocephalic Fistula Repair
1 other identifier
interventional
36
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
End-stage renal failure (ESRF) cohorts undergo brachiocephalic fistula(BCF) transposition with supraclavicular block. However, this is inadequate because the incision may extend to the axillary region which requires intercostobrachial (T2) dermatome blockage. Sedation is commonly indicated to allay anxiety whilst allowing intraprocedural lignocaine infiltration. It is challenging to administer safe sedation to ESRF patients due to multiple comorbidities, polypharmacy, altered pharmacokinetic drug handling. Intraoperative hypotension can be common and evident from the residual effect of antihypertensive and intravascular hypovolemia from regular hemodialysis. Midazolam is metabolized to an active metabolite which can accumulate causes apnea and delayed recovery. TCI propofol needs higher induction doses to achieve hypnosis causes exaggerated hypotension which may jeopardize organ perfusion. The investigators are exploring the potential benefit of sevoflurane sedation which are independent of renal clearance, rapid onset and offset, and ischemic preconditioning property in ESRF cohorts.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 28, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2022
CompletedApril 9, 2021
April 1, 2021
12 months
March 28, 2021
April 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in mean arterial pressure from baseline following sedation
Hemodynamic instability is defined as event below: Hypotension- Drop in mean arterial pressure (MAP) from baseline by more than 20% Hypotension - Drop in systolic blood pressure (sBP \< 140 mmHg) and diastolic blood pressure (dBP \< 90 mmHg)
At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of hemodynamic interventions required during sedation
At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention
Duration of hemodynamic instability
At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention and surgery
Onset time and recovery time
At baseline, pre-, and immediately after intervention and surgery
Study Arms (2)
Target controlled infusion (TCI) propofol
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor TCI propofol group, all patients will receive nasal CPAP mask and nasal breathing with oxygen of 3 litre/min. We will utilize the Schneider model to target effect-site (Cet) starting from 0.5 mcg/ml and with a gradual 0.5mcg/ml increment every 30s until OAAS score of 3 is achieved. For any patients with OAAS score \< 3, Cet will be decreased by a decremental 0.5 mcg/ml. The deepest level of sedation will be recorded.
Sevoflurane sedation
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomised to this arm will be given time to familiarise with the nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask and nasal breathing with oxygen 3 litre/min via a Bain anaesthetic circuit before the introduction of sevoflurane. Once the patient starts to adapt to nasal CPAP mask, sevoflurane will be delivered, starting with a concentration of 0.2% and increase stepwise by 0.2% every 30s until sedation score of OAAS of 3 is achieved. Anaesthetist in charge will assess and maintain sedation endpoint to OAAS 3. If patient is over sedated, sevoflurane concentration will be reduced by 0.2% until OAAS 3. The deepest level of sedation will be recorded.
Interventions
Sevoflurane will be delivered in an incremental dose to throughout procedure to achieve clinical sedation endpoint OAAS 3.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient with end stage renal failure, dialysis dependent undergoing transposition of brachiocephalic fistula repair
- American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification System (ASA) II or III
You may not qualify if:
- Patient refusal
- History or family history of malignant hyperthermia
- Known allergy to propofol or local anaesthetic agent
- Patients who have taken neuroleptics, benzodiazepine over 2 weeks within 1 month
- Chronic use of alcohols/ opioid
- Active lungs disease (eg. acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease)
- Active and significant cardiac disease (eg. decompensated congestive cardiac failure, recent myocardial infarction)
- End-stage heart failure with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
- Recent (\< 3 months) cerebrovascular accident
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (8)
Quek KH, Low EY, Tan YR, Ong ASC, Tang TY, Kam JW, Kiew ASC. Adding a PECS II block for proximal arm arteriovenous access - a randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 May;62(5):677-686. doi: 10.1111/aas.13073. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
PMID: 29359313BACKGROUNDRutkowska K, Knapik P, Misiolek H. The effect of dexmedetomidine sedation on brachial plexus block in patients with end-stage renal disease. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;26(10):851-5. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832a2244.
PMID: 19550340BACKGROUNDVirmani S, Onuchic A, El-Ali IM, Trivedi RD. Propofol Induced Hyperkalemia and Its Management in End Stage Renal Disease Patients. Conn Med. 2016 Sep;80(8):491-493.
PMID: 29782787BACKGROUNDZhong W, Zhang Y, Zhang MZ, Huang XH, Li Y, Li R, Liu QW. Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine administered to patients with end-stage renal failure and secondary hyperparathyroidism undergoing general anaesthesia. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Jun;43(3):414-421. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12652. Epub 2017 Dec 16.
PMID: 29247451BACKGROUNDXie X, Atkins E, Lv J, Bennett A, Neal B, Ninomiya T, Woodward M, MacMahon S, Turnbull F, Hillis GS, Chalmers J, Mant J, Salam A, Rahimi K, Perkovic V, Rodgers A. Effects of intensive blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular and renal outcomes: updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):435-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00805-3. Epub 2015 Nov 7.
PMID: 26559744BACKGROUNDMaheshwari K, Ahuja S, Khanna AK, Mao G, Perez-Protto S, Farag E, Turan A, Kurz A, Sessler DI. Association Between Perioperative Hypotension and Delirium in Postoperative Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2020 Mar;130(3):636-643. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004517.
PMID: 31725024BACKGROUNDJames PA, Oparil S, Carter BL, Cushman WC, Dennison-Himmelfarb C, Handler J, Lackland DT, LeFevre ML, MacKenzie TD, Ogedegbe O, Smith SC Jr, Svetkey LP, Taler SJ, Townsend RR, Wright JT Jr, Narva AS, Ortiz E. 2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8). JAMA. 2014 Feb 5;311(5):507-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.284427.
PMID: 24352797BACKGROUNDKim HY, Lee JE, Kim HY, Kim J. Volatile sedation in the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(49):e8976. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008976.
PMID: 29245269BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chao Chia Cheong, MMed Master
University of Malaya
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 28, 2021
First Posted
April 9, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
March 31, 2022
Study Completion
April 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Starting 6 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- Personal enquiry via email
All collected individual participant data (IPD) and all IPD that underlie results in a publication