Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
Clinical Performance of Indirect Adhesive Restorations Luted With Light-cured Composite Resin
1 other identifier
interventional
83
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clinical performance of indirect adhesive restorations - onlays, overlays- luted with light-cured composite resin will be evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 15, 2021
CompletedApril 9, 2021
April 1, 2021
6 months
April 5, 2021
April 7, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival rate
FDI World Dental Federation criteria functional properties
at 5 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Esthetic properties
at 5 years
Study Arms (1)
Indirect restorations luted with light-cured composite resin.
EXPERIMENTALSubjects for the study will be identified from patients who had treated with indirect adhesive restorations onlay or overlay during the period 2016 to 2017 was performed at Istanbul Okan University Faculty of Dentistry by an experienced clinician. Local anesthesia was applied if necessary. After caries and/or failed restorations were removed, the preparations were performed according to defined principles for adhesive onlays/overlays. At least one cuspal coverage was required for each restoration. All undercuts were eliminated using composite resin. Following the cavity preparation, immediate dentin sealing was applied and polymerized prior to impression taking. Indirect restorations were designed and fabricated with CEREC system. Surface treatments and clinical protocols were performed under manufacturer's instructions. Adhesive cementation with composite resin procedure was carried out with the rubber-dam isolation.
Interventions
Indirect restoration of significant loss of dental hard tissue
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Significant loss of dental hard tissue
- Endodontically treated teeth in posterior region
- Replacement of large compromised existing restoration
- Large Class II restoration
- Age of 18-60 years
- Good oral hygiene
- Presence of interproximal contact to at least one neighboring teeth • In occlusion with antagonist teeth
- Cavity preparation with at least one cuspal coverage
You may not qualify if:
- Serious medical problems or allergies to substances and/or products to be used
- Severe periodontal problems
- Poor oral hygiene
- Direct pulp capping
- Presence of parafunctional behaviors
- Pregnant or breast feeding
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Okan Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Okan University Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, Tuzla, 34959, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (7)
D'Arcangelo C, Zarow M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, Paolantonio M, Giannoni M, D'Amario M. Five-year retrospective clinical study of indirect composite restorations luted with a light-cured composite in posterior teeth. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):615-24. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1001-8. Epub 2013 May 22.
PMID: 23695612BACKGROUNDVeneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(2):204-230.
PMID: 28653051BACKGROUNDHickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
PMID: 20628774BACKGROUNDMagne P, Razaghy M, Carvalho MA, Soares LM. Luting of inlays, onlays, and overlays with preheated restorative composite resin does not prevent seating accuracy. Int J Esthet Dent. 2018;13(3):318-332.
PMID: 30073216BACKGROUNDD'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Casinelli M, Frascaria M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D'Amario M. Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Composite Inlays and Onlays: A Literature Review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015 Sep;36(8):570-7; quiz 578.
PMID: 26355440BACKGROUNDNaeselius K, Arnelund CF, Molin MK. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic onlays: a 4-year retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2008 Jan-Feb;21(1):40-4.
PMID: 18350945BACKGROUNDYurdaguven GY, Ciftcioglu E, Kazokoglu FS, Kayahan MB. 5-Year clinical performance of ceramic onlay and overlay restorations luted with light-cured composite resin. J Dent. 2024 Oct;149:105258. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105258. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
PMID: 39067649DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gülşah Yenier, DDS, PhD
Istanbul Okan University Faculty of Dentistry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assist.Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2021
First Posted
April 9, 2021
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2021
Study Completion
September 15, 2021
Last Updated
April 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04