Percussion Palm Cup: Safety and Usability in Infants and Children With Cystic Fibrosis
PPC
1 other identifier
interventional
25
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cystic Fibrosis is the most prevalent fatal genetic disease affecting Canadian children and it primarily characterized by a thickening of pulmonary secretions and impaired mucociliary clearance. Chest physiotherapy has been widely used as a standard treatment for sputum mobilization and clearance for individuals with CF. Percussion is one such technique of chest physiotherapy for loosening trapped music within the lungs and can be completed manually or facilitated with a percussion cup. Unfortunately, the exclusive Canadian supplier for the widely use percussor cup has stopped distributing the cups, leaving many hospitals and therapy clinics searching for alternatives to continue airway clearance treatment. The goal of this project is to compare alternative palm cup solutions to the standard, and recommend safe alternative(s) that caregivers can have easy access to.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2022
CompletedJuly 14, 2022
July 1, 2022
12 months
April 1, 2021
July 11, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Safety and user questionnaire
Participants and families will be asked to report any adverse effects of the use of the PCC. These could include erythema of the skin, bruising or general discomfort using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very disatisfied, 5 = very satisfied) and open-ended questions. A higher value on the Likert scale indicates a better outcome as the participant identifies that they were satisfied when using the cup. This will also be used to compare satisfaction between cups.
Through study completion, average 1 year
Usability using the Pictorial Single-Item Usability Scale (PSIUS)
The Pictorial Single-Item Usability Scale (PSIUS) is an instrument used to measure perceived usability and satisfaction of each cup. This scale concludes three main visual elements that evaluate satisfaction and emotions experience while using a system or product. It uses visual images of disatisfaction to satisfaction, following a 9-point scale (-4 = very disatisfied, 4 = very satisfied). A higher number indicates a better experience when using the cup. This pictorial single-item scale will be used within our questionnaire to assess the overall rating of satisfaction and usability when using the Percussion Palm Cups.
Through study completion, average 1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Quebec User Evaluation Utility Questionnaire (QUEST)
Through study completion, average 1 year
Overall satisfaction questionnaire
Through study completion, average 1 year
Study Arms (3)
Randomized Crossover: Percussion Palm Cup Safety and Usability - Cup 1
EXPERIMENTALThe standard percussor palm cups are made out of a soft vinyl material molded into shape. The outer diameter of the infant palm cup is 1-3/4 inches and there is a 1-inch diameter pocket inside this product similar to a suction cup.
Randomized Crossover: Percussion Palm Cup Safety and Usability - Cup 2
EXPERIMENTALThis product was developed by MMRI personnel using a small custom 3D printed plastic handle and a 0.93-inch, single bellow, Buna-N rubber suction cup. The handle was made on the MMRI's 3D printer using ABS plastic and the suction cup was sourced from McMaster Carr (#5427A106). The handle is made up of three pieces; top, base and a pin that is designed to fix the top, base and suction cup to each other. There is a small hole through the pin which helps relieve some of the pressure that builds in the suction cup during use. It is not shown in the image to the right, but the handle will be coated in Plasti Dip for added user comfort.
Randomized Crossover: Percussion Palm Cup Safety and Usability - Cup 3
EXPERIMENTALThis product was developed by MMRI personnel using a large custom 3D printed plastic handle and a 0.93-inch, single bellow, Buna-N rubber suction cup. The handle was made on the MMRI's 3D printer using ABS plastic and the suction cup was sourced from McMaster Carr (#5427A106). The handle is made up of three pieces; top, base and a pin that is designed to fix the top, base and suction cup to each other. There is a small hole through the pin which helps relieve some of the pressure that builds in the suction cup during use. It is not shown in the image to the right, but the handle will be coated in Plasti Dip for added user comfort.
Interventions
Patients/guardians/caregivers will be given 3 percussor palm cups to use over the course of 6 days. Each cup will be trialed for 2 days, allowing for equal time dedicated to each.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Infants and children with CF under the age of 6 and their parent/guardian/caregiver to perform chest percussions using percussor palm cups.
- Participants must currently require regular chest physiotherapy.
You may not qualify if:
- A comorbid condition that is a contraindication for the use of percussor palm cups.
- Inability of parent/guardian/caregiver to complete written questionnaires due to visual or cognitive impairment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
McMaster Children's Hospital Cystic Fibrosis Clinic
Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 2A5, Canada
Related Publications (15)
Button BM, Heine RG, Catto-Smith AG, Olinsky A, Phelan PD, Ditchfield MR, Story I. Chest physiotherapy in infants with cystic fibrosis: to tip or not? A five-year study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003 Mar;35(3):208-13. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10227.
PMID: 12567389BACKGROUNDFlume PA, Robinson KA, O'Sullivan BP, Finder JD, Vender RL, Willey-Courand DB, White TB, Marshall BC; Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pulmonary Therapies Committee. Cystic fibrosis pulmonary guidelines: airway clearance therapies. Respir Care. 2009 Apr;54(4):522-37.
PMID: 19327189BACKGROUNDRiordan JR, Rommens JM, Kerem B, Alon N, Rozmahel R, Grzelczak Z, Zielenski J, Lok S, Plavsic N, Chou JL, et al. Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA. Science. 1989 Sep 8;245(4922):1066-73. doi: 10.1126/science.2475911.
PMID: 2475911BACKGROUNDCollins FS. Cystic fibrosis: molecular biology and therapeutic implications. Science. 1992 May 8;256(5058):774-9. doi: 10.1126/science.1375392.
PMID: 1375392BACKGROUNDGursli S, Sandvik L, Bakkeheim E, Skrede B, Stuge B. Evaluation of a novel technique in airway clearance therapy - Specific Cough Technique (SCT) in cystic fibrosis: A pilot study of a series of N-of-1 randomised controlled trials. SAGE Open Med. 2017 Mar 17;5:2050312117697505. doi: 10.1177/2050312117697505. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28540046BACKGROUNDO'Sullivan BP, Freedman SD. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1891-904. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60327-5. Epub 2009 May 4.
PMID: 19403164BACKGROUNDOrenstein DM, Boat TF, Stern RC, Tucker AS, Charnock EL, Matthews LW, Doershuk CF. The effect of early diagnosis and treatment in cystic fibrosis: a seven-year study of 16 sibling pairs. Am J Dis Child. 1977 Sep;131(9):973-5. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1977.02120220039005.
PMID: 900085BACKGROUNDWarnock L, Gates A. Chest physiotherapy compared to no chest physiotherapy for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD001401. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001401.pub3.
PMID: 26688006BACKGROUNDPunithavathi N, Ong LM, Irfhan Ali HA, Mohd Izmi IA, Dharminy T, Ang AH, Hadzlinda Z, Sivasangari S. A Pilot Randomized Control Cross over Study Evaluating the Effectiveness and Safety of Mechanical Percussor Compared with Conventional Chest Physiotherapy in Adults with Productive Cough. Med J Malaysia. 2014 Feb;69(1):16-20.
PMID: 24814623BACKGROUNDBlazey S, Jenkins S, Smith R. Rate and force of application of manual chest percussion by physiotherapists. Aust J Physiother. 1998;44(4):257-264. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60385-8.
PMID: 11676741BACKGROUNDGregson RK, Stocks J, Petley GW, Shannon H, Warner JO, Jagannathan R, Main E. Simultaneous measurement of force and respiratory profiles during chest physiotherapy in ventilated children. Physiol Meas. 2007 Sep;28(9):1017-28. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/9/004. Epub 2007 Aug 21.
PMID: 17827650BACKGROUNDHardy KA, Anderson BD. Noninvasive clearance of airway secretions. Respir Care Clin N Am. 1996 Jun;2(2):323-45.
PMID: 9390886BACKGROUNDDemers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assist Technol. 2000;12(2):96-105. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2000.10132015.
PMID: 11508406BACKGROUNDGreulich T, Kehr K, Nell C, Koepke J, Haid D, Koehler U, Koehler K, Filipovic S, Kenn K, Vogelmeier C, Koczulla AR. A randomized clinical trial to assess the influence of a three months training program (gym-based individualized vs. calisthenics-based non-invidualized) in COPD-patients. Respir Res. 2014 Mar 25;15(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-15-36.
PMID: 24666558BACKGROUNDVaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013 Sep;15(3):398-405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
PMID: 23480423BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The cups will be numbered, not identified by manufactured cup or 3D printed.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 1, 2021
First Posted
April 8, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 30, 2022
Study Completion
June 30, 2022
Last Updated
July 14, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share