NCT04835155

Brief Summary

ABSTRACT Objective: To test the effect of the Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI) at 29-30 weeks post-menstrual age on the development of oral-motor function and sucking capacity. Study Design: This study was a single-blind randomized controlled experimental design. The sample consisted of 60 preterm babies from two Neonatal Intensive Care Units in Gaziantep, Turkey between May 2019 and March 2020, with 30 each in the control and experimental groups. The PIOMI was applied to the experimental group for five minutes a day for 14 consecutive days. Sucking capacity, growth, feeding outcomes, and length of hospital stay (LOS) were measured. The Yakut Manometer Measuring Suction Power (PCT/TR2019/050678) was developed specifically for this study and tested for the first time.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2019

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2019

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2020

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 15, 2020

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 25, 2021

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

April 8, 2021

Status Verified

April 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

March 25, 2021

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Preterm InfantSucking CapacityPremature Infant Oral Motor InterventionFeedingOral Stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Baby's sucking power

    The suction power of the baby was measured in mmHg with the Manometer measuring the Sucking Power.

    The sucking power of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.

  • Baby's sucking before releasing the bottle

    The baby's sucking time without leaving the bottle was calculated in seconds.

    The sucking time without leaving the bottle of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.

  • Baby's total sucking time

    The baby's total sucking time was calculated in seconds.

    The total sucking time of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.

  • Baby's sucking amount

    The baby's sucking amount was calculated in milliliters.

    The sucking amount of the baby included in the study was measured up to 32 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Baby's body weight

    The baby's body weight was measured for up to 40 weeks.

  • Baby's height

    Baby's height was measured for up to 40 weeks.

  • Baby's head circumference

    Baby's head circumference was measured for up to 40 weeks.

  • First day of oral feeding time

    The day when the baby was able to have the first oral feeding was measured up to 40 weeks.

  • Discharge time

    Up to 40 weeks were measured on the day of discharge.

Study Arms (2)

experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

The researcher applied Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention to the experimental group for 5 minutes per day for 14 consecutive days, 15-20 minutes before a sheduled feeding at either the 09:00 or 12:00 feeding. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in experimental group was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials. Growth measures were collected on the 1st and 14th days and the day of disharge.

Procedure: Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI)

control grup

NO INTERVENTION

The researcher did not apply any intervention. On the first day, the baseline sucking capacity of babies in control group was measured before any intervention. On the following 8th, 11th and 14th days, the measures of sucking capacity were repeated and followed by oral feeding trials.

Interventions

The Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention (PIOMI), developed by Dr. Brenda Lessen Knoll, was chosen for this study because it is the only oral motor program designed specifically for preterm babies as young as 29 weeks post menstrual age (PMA) and is the only program with a standardized training method and published intervention fidelity. The 5 minute therapy offers assisted movement to activate muscle contraction and movement against resistance to build strength in the perioral structures. The PIOMI has 8 steps where a provider uses a pinky finger to provide gentle stroking and pressure on the cheeks, lips, tongue, gums and palate to strengthen the oral sensory-motor functions and improve feeding efficiency. PIOMI ends with 2 minutes of NNS. NNS and oral stimulation have been found to mature the oral motor sensory system, and improve not only bottle feeding, but also breastfeeding.

experimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age29 Weeks - 30 Weeks
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • babies born at 26-30 weeks PMA,
  • stable clinical condition,
  • vital signs stable for at least 24 hours,
  • able to have PIOMI by the 29th or 30th week PMA,
  • required respiratory support limited to an oxyhood, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and/or nasal cannula up to 2L flow,
  • APGAR scores at 1- and 5-minutes of 4 and above,
  • any race or ethnicity,
  • intraventricular hemmorhage limited to level 1 or 2; and
  • had no birth defects including facial anomolies that would impact feeding.

You may not qualify if:

  • Whose gestational age at birth was less than 26 weeks,
  • had congenital disorder or birth trauma,
  • had NEC,
  • had RDS,
  • were diagnosed with severe asphyxia,
  • had intraventricular bleeding,
  • had Newborn Withdrawal Syndrome,
  • had Fetal Alcohol Syndrome,
  • were receiving ventilator support,
  • were receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation,
  • developed any complications during the follow-up period in the intervention group, whose balance status deteriorated,
  • whose written and verbal permissions were obtained from their parents.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hasan Kalyoncu University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing

Gaziantep, Şahinbey, 27412, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Tian X, Yi LJ, Zhang L, Zhou JG, Ma L, Ou YX, Shuai T, Zeng Z, Song GM. Oral Motor Intervention Improved the Oral Feeding in Preterm Infants: Evidence Based on a Meta-Analysis With Trial Sequential Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(31):e1310. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001310.

  • Lessen Knoll BS, Daramas T, Drake V. Randomized Controlled Trial of a Prefeeding Oral Motor Therapy and Its Effect on Feeding Improvement in a Thai NICU. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2019 Mar;48(2):176-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

  • Fucile S, Gisel E, Lau C. Oral stimulation accelerates the transition from tube to oral feeding in preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2002 Aug;141(2):230-6. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.125731.

  • Lessen BS. Effect of the premature infant oral motor intervention on feeding progression and length of stay in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011 Apr;11(2):129-39. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0b013e3182115a2a.

  • Lessen BS, Morello CA, Williams LJ. Establishing Intervention Fidelity of an Oral Motor Intervention for Preterm Infants. Neonatal Netw. 2015;34(2):72-82. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.34.2.72.

  • Kamitsuka MD, Nervik PA, Nielsen SL, Clark RH. Incidence of Nasogastric and Gastrostomy Tube at Discharge Is Reduced after Implementing an Oral Feeding Protocol in Premature (< 30 weeks) Infants. Am J Perinatol. 2017 May;34(6):606-613. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601443. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

  • Li XL, Liu Y, Liu M, Yang CY, Yang QZ. Early Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention Improved Oral Feeding and Prognosis by Promoting Neurodevelopment. Am J Perinatol. 2020 May;37(6):626-632. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1685448. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

  • Ghomi H, Yadegari F, Soleimani F, Knoll BL, Noroozi M, Mazouri A. The effects of premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI) on oral feeding of preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;120:202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.005. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Feeding BehaviorPremature BirthSucking Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior, AnimalBehaviorObstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Selver GÜLER, PhD

    https://www.hku.edu.tr/

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The PIOMI was applied only by the trained researcher, and blind to the nursing staff in charge of care and feeding. No information about the PIOMI was shared with the general staff working in the NICU, and it was performed in the absence of the mothers, although no formal curtain was used for additional blinding.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Sample The sample consisted of a total of 60 preterm infants all born after 26 weeks PMA with 30 each in the experimental and control group. Subjects were enrolled when they reached 29 or 30 weeks PMA and met inclusion criteria, and whose parents gave written consent. Random assignment to groups was performed by a research assistant, who was not involved in the research but worked in the same unit as the researchers, using the online software at https://www.randomizer.org. The primary nurses were blinded to groups, and the parents stepped out during therapy to assist in blinding.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. Asst.Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Posted

April 8, 2021

Study Start

May 1, 2019

Primary Completion

March 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 15, 2020

Last Updated

April 8, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

We plan to share it after it is ready for publication.

Locations