NCT04834505

Brief Summary

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a special type of chronic pancreatitis mediated by autoimmunity. The classic manifestation of AIP is diffuse pancreatic enlargement, some of which are characterized by focal enlargement. Clinically, it is divided into diffuse AIP (DAIP) and focal AIP (FAIP) according to morphology. FAIP can be clinically manifested as obstructive jaundice, peripancreatic lymphadenopathy and vascular involvement, which may mimic pancreatic cancer (PC). CT/MRI is the important imaging tool for diagnosing pancreatic diseases. However, due to the overlap of the imaging features of FAIP and PC, it is challenging to differentiate the two by CT/MRI. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) can clearly display the pancreatic parenchyma and pancreatic duct system and has become a routine modality for the evaluation of pancreatic diseases. The aim of this study is to construct a diagnosis model for distinguishing between FAIP and PC by comparing the EUS characteristics of the two, and further validate its diagnostic efficacy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
286

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2021

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2021

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 8, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 11, 2021

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Status Verified

May 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

April 4, 2021

Last Update Submit

May 27, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • To construct a diagnosis model for distinguishing FAIP from PC and further validate its efficacy

    Score is assigned to each predictor based on the odd ratio (OR) value, individual risk is estimated based on the sum of weighted score for each predictor and optimal cut-off point is obtained based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were used to assess the diagnostic efficacy.

    1 week after the diagnosis is conclusive

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare the efficacy of EUS based on the model with that of CT/MRI/PET-CT in differentiating between FAIP and PC

    1 week after the diagnosis is conclusive

Study Arms (2)

Derivation sample

The patients conclusively diagnosed as FAIP or PC are retrospectively collected.

Other: EUS for derivation sample

Validation sample

The patients with difficulty in distinguishing between FAIP and PC are prospectively enrolled.

Other: Diagnostic imaging modalities for validation sample

Interventions

Endoscopic ultrasound and other imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, or PET-CT are performed.

Validation sample

Endoscopic ultrasound was performed.

Derivation sample

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

In derivation sample, the patients conclusively diagnosed as FAIP or PC are retrospectively collected. In validation sample, the patients with difficulty in distinguishing between FAIP and PC are prospectively enrolled. In the end, the patient with a diagnosis that is neither FAIP nor PC and the patient without conclusive diagnosis are withdrawn from the study.

You may qualify if:

  • Patients with difficulty in distinguishing between FAIP and PC

You may not qualify if:

  • Referred patients with a history of having being conclusively diagnosed as AIP or PC; Patients with DAIP; Patients with alcoholic pancreatitis, hypertriglyceridemia pancreatitis or pancreatitis due to gallstones; Patients with pancreatic cystic tumors, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors or solid pseudopapillary tumors of pancreas; Patients who cannot undergo EUS due to unsuitable conditions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China

Location

Related Publications (7)

  • Hart PA, Zen Y, Chari ST. Recent Advances in Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2015 Jul;149(1):39-51. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.03.010. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

    PMID: 25770706BACKGROUND
  • Kamisawa T, Okamoto A. Autoimmune pancreatitis: proposal of IgG4-related sclerosing disease. J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jul;41(7):613-25. doi: 10.1007/s00535-006-1862-6.

    PMID: 16932997BACKGROUND
  • Miyabe K, Zen Y, Cornell LD, Rajagopalan G, Chowdhary VR, Roberts LR, Chari ST. Gastrointestinal and Extra-Intestinal Manifestations of IgG4-Related Disease. Gastroenterology. 2018 Oct;155(4):990-1003.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.082. Epub 2018 Sep 12.

    PMID: 30012334BACKGROUND
  • Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Sou H, Sano K, Tsukamoto T, Fatima Z, Araki T. Mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma: differential diagnosis on the basis of computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and diffusion-weighted imaging findings. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Apr;35(4):827-36. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22881. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

    PMID: 22069025BACKGROUND
  • Gardner TB, Levy MJ. EUS diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Jun;71(7):1280-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.02.038. No abstract available.

    PMID: 20598255BACKGROUND
  • Hoki N, Mizuno N, Sawaki A, Tajika M, Takayama R, Shimizu Y, Bhatia V, Yamao K. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(2):154-9. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2294-2. Epub 2009 Feb 13.

    PMID: 19214678BACKGROUND
  • Chari ST, Takahashi N, Levy MJ, Smyrk TC, Clain JE, Pearson RK, Petersen BT, Topazian MA, Vege SS. A diagnostic strategy to distinguish autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009 Oct;7(10):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.04.020. Epub 2009 May 4.

    PMID: 19410017BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Autoimmune PancreatitisPancreatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pancreatitis, ChronicPancreatitisPancreatic DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesChronic DiseaseDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsDigestive System NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsEndocrine Gland NeoplasmsEndocrine System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Tao Guo, MD

    Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associated professor in Department of Gastroenterolgy

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2021

First Posted

April 8, 2021

Study Start

May 11, 2021

Primary Completion

September 30, 2024

Study Completion

December 30, 2024

Last Updated

May 31, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The protocol of the study is private.

Locations