NCT04832997

Brief Summary

This is a single-center, paired-cohort, prospective study. Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits. The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type prostate biopsies patients will undergo. During the following visit, patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS ≥ 3 and PRI-MUS ≥ 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx (Group 4). Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx (Group 1). Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 2). Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 3). Our hypothesis is that the sensitivity for csPCa (defined as prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 3+4) of Micro-US will be superior or at least equal to that of mpMRI. Despite the introduction of the mpMRI and MRI-TBx has improved the diagnostic pathway of PCa, the proportion of men with negative mpMRI with a csPCa is still difficult to delineate due to the high variability of mpMRI negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity. In this context, a specific standardization of the use of Micro-US may play a crucial role to optimize PCa diagnostic pathway. Moreover, a direct comparison between Micro-US and mpMRI might be useful to determinate whether Micro-US could be more accurate than mpMRI for PCa diagnosis. Furthermore, in patients with suspicion of PCa the combined use between mpMRI and Micro-US might increase the detection of csPCa and reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, improving mpMRI limitations in NPV and specificity. Demonstrating that Micro-US provides a similar sensitivity for csPCa as compared to mpMRI may lead to its definitive inclusion in daily clinical practice, potentially replacing mpMRI, streamlining the current diagnostic pathway of PCa.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for not_applicable prostate-cancer

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 14, 2020

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2021

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 6, 2021

Completed
4.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 16, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 16, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4.8 years

First QC Date

April 3, 2021

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer of Micro-US vs. mpMRI

    To compare the sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer of Micro-US vs. mpMRI

    through study completation, an average time of 2 years

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Proportion of clinically significant prostate cancer detected with the inclusion of Micro-US within the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer

    through study completation, an average time of 2 years

  • Proportion of men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer detected by MRI-TBx vs. Micro-US-TBx

    through study completation, an average time of 2 years

  • Proportion of men with at least one lesion detected by mpMRI vs. Micro-US

    through study completation, an average time of 2 years

  • Proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer detected by Micro-US-TBx missed by MRI-TBx and vice-versa

    through study completation, an average time of 2 years

Study Arms (1)

mpMRI plus Micro-US

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits (randomized sequence). The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type of prostate biopsies patients will undergo.

Diagnostic Test: Prostate biopsy systematic random prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) + eventual MRI-targeted biopsy (MRI-TBx) + eventual microUS-targeted (Micro-US-TBx)

Interventions

Patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS \>= 3 and PRI-MUS \>= 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx. Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx.

mpMRI plus Micro-US

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Men at least 18 years of age referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy
  • Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml
  • Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ-confined prostate cancer)
  • Fit to undergo all procedures listed in protocol
  • Able to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior treatment for prostate cancer
  • Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker, estimated GFR ≤ 50mls/min)
  • Contraindication to prostate biopsy
  • Men in whom artifact would reduce the quality of the MRI
  • Previous hip replacement surgery, metallic hip replacement or extensive pelvic orthopaedic metal work
  • Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

IRCCS San Raffaele

Milan, 20132, Italy

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: Every patient will receive the same diagnostic test (MRI and Micro-US) in a randomized sequence
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Full Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2021

First Posted

April 6, 2021

Study Start

September 14, 2020

Primary Completion

July 16, 2025

Study Completion

July 16, 2025

Last Updated

July 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations