Study Stopped
The study faced structural and methodological obstacles, with limited enrollment, technical issues, low adherence, and loss of scientific relevance.
Micro-ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
Micro-ultrasound or MRI-targeted Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis
1 other identifier
interventional
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is a single-center, paired-cohort, prospective study. Patients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits. The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type prostate biopsies patients will undergo. During the following visit, patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS ≥ 3 and PRI-MUS ≥ 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx (Group 4). Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx (Group 1). Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 2). Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx (Group 3). Our hypothesis is that the sensitivity for csPCa (defined as prostate cancer with Gleason score ≥ 3+4) of Micro-US will be superior or at least equal to that of mpMRI. Despite the introduction of the mpMRI and MRI-TBx has improved the diagnostic pathway of PCa, the proportion of men with negative mpMRI with a csPCa is still difficult to delineate due to the high variability of mpMRI negative predictive value (NPV) and specificity. In this context, a specific standardization of the use of Micro-US may play a crucial role to optimize PCa diagnostic pathway. Moreover, a direct comparison between Micro-US and mpMRI might be useful to determinate whether Micro-US could be more accurate than mpMRI for PCa diagnosis. Furthermore, in patients with suspicion of PCa the combined use between mpMRI and Micro-US might increase the detection of csPCa and reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, improving mpMRI limitations in NPV and specificity. Demonstrating that Micro-US provides a similar sensitivity for csPCa as compared to mpMRI may lead to its definitive inclusion in daily clinical practice, potentially replacing mpMRI, streamlining the current diagnostic pathway of PCa.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable prostate-cancer
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 14, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 16, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 16, 2025
CompletedJuly 20, 2025
July 1, 2025
4.8 years
April 3, 2021
July 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer of Micro-US vs. mpMRI
To compare the sensitivity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer of Micro-US vs. mpMRI
through study completation, an average time of 2 years
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of clinically significant prostate cancer detected with the inclusion of Micro-US within the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer
through study completation, an average time of 2 years
Proportion of men with clinically insignificant prostate cancer detected by MRI-TBx vs. Micro-US-TBx
through study completation, an average time of 2 years
Proportion of men with at least one lesion detected by mpMRI vs. Micro-US
through study completation, an average time of 2 years
Proportion of men with clinically significant prostate cancer detected by Micro-US-TBx missed by MRI-TBx and vice-versa
through study completation, an average time of 2 years
Study Arms (1)
mpMRI plus Micro-US
EXPERIMENTALPatients with a clinical suspicion of csPCa will receive mpMRI and Micro-US in two different visits (randomized sequence). The results of the diagnostic procedures will determine how many and which type of prostate biopsies patients will undergo.
Interventions
Patients with both positive mpMRI and Micro-US, defined as the presence of one or more lesions with PI-RADS \>= 3 and PRI-MUS \>= 3 respectively, will receive a 12-core TRUSBx in addiction to MRI-TBx and Micro-US-TBx. Patients with both negative mpMRI and Micro-US will receive a 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive mpMRI will receive MRI-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx. Patients with only positive Micro-US-TBx will receive Micro-US-TBx and 12-core TRUSBx.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men at least 18 years of age referred with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who have been advised to have a prostate biopsy
- Serum PSA ≤ 20ng/ml
- Suspected stage ≤ T2 on rectal examination (organ-confined prostate cancer)
- Fit to undergo all procedures listed in protocol
- Able to provide written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior treatment for prostate cancer
- Prior diagnosis of prostate cancer
- Contraindication to MRI (e.g. claustrophobia, pacemaker, estimated GFR ≤ 50mls/min)
- Contraindication to prostate biopsy
- Men in whom artifact would reduce the quality of the MRI
- Previous hip replacement surgery, metallic hip replacement or extensive pelvic orthopaedic metal work
- Unfit to undergo any procedures listed in protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
IRCCS San Raffaele
Milan, 20132, Italy
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 3, 2021
First Posted
April 6, 2021
Study Start
September 14, 2020
Primary Completion
July 16, 2025
Study Completion
July 16, 2025
Last Updated
July 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07