Impact of 'Recovery' Footwear on Lower Extremity Comfort and Biomechanics
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to understand the impact of wearing shoes with a compliant, energy absorbing midsole material, outside of athletic training sessions on the mechanics of movement, performance, and perceived joint pain and stiffness. Advances in material science have led to a wider range of cushioning system material properties and mid and outsole geometries in footwear. While there are many marketing claims about the potential health benefits of this new class of footwear these have not yet been investigated in well-designed scientific studies. It is hypothesized that the intervention shoe as compared to the control will reduce self-reported joint pain and stiffness, improve ankle plantarflexion function and increase intersegmental foot motion during walking.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 8, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2022
CompletedApril 5, 2021
February 1, 2021
12 months
March 5, 2021
April 1, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (16)
Calf Muscles Strength
Unilateral isometric and isokinetic strength based on maximal contractions performed on a dynamometer.
2 - 3 hours on week 1
Calf Muscles Strength
Unilateral isometric and isokinetic strength based on maximal contractions performed on a dynamometer.
2 - 3 hours on week 6.
Gait Mechanics
Gait kinematics during overground walk at preferred speed, and 1.4m/s, evaluated with a motion capture system.
Gait analysis test at week 1 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s
Gait Mechanics
Gait kinematics during overground walk at preferred speed, and 1.4m/s, evaluated with a motion capture system.
Gait analysis test at week 6 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s
Muscle EMG activity
Unilateral Surface Electromyography of Medial Gastrocnemius, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Vastus Medialis, Vastus Lateralis, Tibialis Anterior, Peroneus Longus, Soleus, Biceps Femoris, and Semitendinosus, during overground walk.
Gait analysis test at week 1 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s
Muscle EMG activity
Unilateral Surface Electromyography of Medial Gastrocnemius, Lateral Gastrocnemius, Vastus Medialis, Vastus Lateralis, Tibialis Anterior, Peroneus Longus, Soleus, Biceps Femoris, and Semitendinosus, during overground walk.
Gait analysis test at week 6 with 5 trials of overground walking at a speed of 1.4 m/s
Maximum Vertical Jump
Height (m) of center of mass above ground measured by markers place on posterior superior iliac spine.
2 - 3 hours on week 1
Maximum Vertical Jump
Height (m) of center of mass above ground measured by markers place on posterior superior iliac spine.
2 - 3 hours on week 6
Self-reported shoe comfort
Shoe wear and comfort log
Week 0, 5 minutes
Self-reported pain, and injury.
Injury and pain log
Week 0, 5 minutes
Self-reported shoe comfort
Shoe wear and comfort log
Week 2, 5 minutes
Self-reported pain, and injury.
Injury and pain log
Week 2, 5 minutes
Self-reported shoe comfort
Shoe wear and comfort log
Week 4, 5 minutes
Self-reported pain, and injury.
Injury and pain log
Week 4, 5 minutes
Self-reported shoe comfort
Shoe wear and comfort log
Week 6, 5 minutes
Self-reported pain, and injury.
Injury and pain log
Week 6, 5 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants assigned to the control group will be asked to continue wearing their typical shoes and to complete every two weeks the footwear and injury log provided
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALIndividuals assigned to the intervention group will be provided with 2 styles of the OOFOS recovery shoes, and will be asked to wear the OOFOS slide, sandal and/or closed toe shoes as their primary footwear outside training and competition for the 6 weeks between study visits. Intervention participants will also be asked to complete a daily shoe wear log and a shoe comfort assessment survey every other week.
Interventions
The OOFOS shoes/ sandals are a commercially available footwear with a compliant, energy absorbing midsole material.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- BMI 18 - 35 kg/m2.
- Stiff or cleated footwear athlete on a competitive team.
You may not qualify if:
- Current injury that required absence from one or more practices in the last 3 weeks of regular team practice.
- Orthotic or other shoe insert used outside of athletic training times.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Musculoskeletal & Orthopedic Biomechanics Laboratory/ University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amherst, Massachusetts, 01002, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2021
First Posted
April 5, 2021
Study Start
February 8, 2021
Primary Completion
January 31, 2022
Study Completion
January 31, 2022
Last Updated
April 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share