NCT04829461

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the single-use Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto for removal of ureteral stents as compared to routine flexible reusable cystoscopes.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
102

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 31, 2021

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 2, 2021

Completed
25 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 27, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2022

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 20, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Status Verified

September 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

March 31, 2021

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Ureteral StentaScope 4 Cystosingle-use cystoscope

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The success rate of the Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto and the Ambu® aView™ 2 Advance for stent removal procedures performed in the outpatient setting.

    Stent removal procedural success rate with the Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto and the Ambu® aView™ 2 Advance.

    Procedure Date (Day 0)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Comparison of Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto and the Ambu® aView™ 2 Advance for stent removal procedures performed in the outpatient setting to standard of care reusable scopes on scope performance.

    Procedure Date (Day 0)

  • Comparison of the Cumulative Procedure Time between the Ambu® aScope™ 4 cysto and the site's SOC reusable flexible cystoscope.

    Procedure Date (Day 0)

  • To evaluate the user experience during cystoscopic procedures.

    Clinician Questionnaire; completed within one (1) day of procedure date (Day 0).

  • Safety Endpoints

    7-10 Days Post-Procedure

Study Arms (2)

Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto

EXPERIMENTAL

Ureteral stent removal procedure performed with Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto (single-use cystoscope).

Device: Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto with the aView™ 2 Advance used for stent removal

Standard of Care (SOC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Ureteral stent removal procedure performed with standard of care (reusable cystoscope).

Device: Standard of care reusable cystoscope used for stent removal

Interventions

Procedure using a single-use cystoscope for stent removal

Ambu® aScope™ 4 Cysto

Procedure using a reusable cystoscope for stent removal

Standard of Care (SOC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adult (male or female), ≥18 years old
  • Patient undergoing routine flexible cystoscopy
  • Patient with a ureteral stent in the urinary system that is ready to be removed.
  • No active urinary tract infection
  • Subject is willing and able to sign informed consent and HIPAA authorization and comply with requirements of the protocol.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of prior bladder/urethral reconstructive surgery.
  • History of high-grade bladder cancer or carcinoma in-situ of the bladder, undergoing cystoscopy for follow-up/surveillance purposes.
  • Known unpassable urethral stricture
  • Febrile patient with active urinary tract infection (UTI)
  • Subjects with acute infection (acute urethritis, acute prostatitis, acute epididymitis)
  • Subject with severe coagulopathy
  • Patient is unable to read and/or understand study requirements
  • Patient is unable or unwilling to provide written consent to participate in the study.
  • Subject, in the opinion of the Investigator, has a severe comorbidity, poor general physical/mental health and/or a condition that will not

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

The Pennsylvania State University and The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033, United States

Location

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Location

University of Wisconsin-Madison

Madison, Wisconsin, 53792, United States

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Samplaski MK, Jones JS. Two centuries of cystoscopy: the development of imaging, instrumentation and synergistic technologies. BJU Int. 2009 Jan;103(2):154-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08244.x. Epub 2008 Dec 8.

    PMID: 19076146BACKGROUND
  • O'Sullivan DC, Chilton CP. Flexible cystoscopy. Br J Hosp Med. 1994 Apr 6-19;51(7):340-5.

    PMID: 8081563BACKGROUND
  • Pillai PL, Sooriakumaran P. Flexible cystoscopy: a revolution in urological practice. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2009 Oct;70(10):583-5. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2009.70.10.44626.

    PMID: 19966704BACKGROUND
  • Gee JR, Waterman BJ, Jarrard DF, Hedican SP, Bruskewitz RC, Nakada SY. Flexible and rigid cystoscopy in women. JSLS. 2009 Apr-Jun;13(2):135-8.

    PMID: 19660204BACKGROUND
  • Kadi N, Menezes P. ABC of flexible cystoscopy for junior trainee and general practitioner. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:593-6. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S20267. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

    PMID: 21887113BACKGROUND
  • Miner N, Harris V, Lukomski N, Ebron T. Rinsability of orthophthalaldehyde from endoscopes. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012;2012:853781. doi: 10.1155/2012/853781. Epub 2012 May 16.

    PMID: 22665966BACKGROUND
  • Sokol WN. Nine episodes of anaphylaxis following cystoscopy caused by Cidex OPA (ortho-phthalaldehyde) high-level disinfectant in 4 patients after cytoscopy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Aug;114(2):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.04.031.

    PMID: 15316522BACKGROUND
  • Johnson BA, Raman JD, Best SL, Lotan Y. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use vs Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal. J Endourol. 2023 Oct;37(10):1139-1144. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0134.

Study Officials

  • Elizabeth Smith

    Ambu Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2021

First Posted

April 2, 2021

Study Start

April 27, 2021

Primary Completion

July 15, 2022

Study Completion

July 20, 2022

Last Updated

September 16, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations