Comparative Study of Anchoring-tip vs. Conventional EMR of Colorectal Polyps
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective and has been widely used technique for the treatment of superficial colorectal neoplasms. Although, conventional EMR (CEMR) showed high efficacy for the management of colorectal superficial neoplasms, there is problematic limitation in this technique - incomplete resection. In literature, the anchoring-tip EMR (AEMR), named as "Tip-in EMR" was first introduced in 2016 from Japan. Recently, several retrospective studies have been suggested about the effectiveness of AEMR. However, there has been no prospective randomized controlled study to identify its advantage over CEMR. Therefore, the investigators performed a multicenter randomized controlled trial to estimate the effectiveness of AEMR compared with CEMR for the endoscopic treatment of intermediate-size (10 to 20 mm) colorectal polyps.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 29, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2022
CompletedApril 1, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
March 29, 2021
March 29, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Primary outcome was comparing the R0 resection rate between Anchoring-tip EMR and Conventional EMR.
Histopathologic complete resection (R0) was defined as en bloc resection and clear lateral and vertical resection margins.
From EMR to reporting of histopathology, 1 month
Study Arms (2)
Anchoring-tip EMR
ACTIVE COMPARATORAEMR, the snare tip was projected from the sheath by 1-2 mm length. Consequently, a small mucosal incision was made at proximal side of lesion. Then the snare was deployed progressively and adjusted around the lesion trying to obtain free margins.
Conventional EMR
ACTIVE COMPARATORAfter injection of normal saline solution mix, snaring was tried for CEMR.
Interventions
Anchoring-tip: the snare tip was projected from the sheath by 1-2 mm length. Consequently, a small mucosal incision was made at proximal side of lesion. Then the snare was deployed progressively and adjusted around the lesion trying to obtain free margins. At the final step of both conventional and Tip-in EMR, the lesion was resected. Conventional: After injection of normal saline solution mix, snaring was tried for polyp resection.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Intermediate-size (10 to 20 mm) colorectal polyps
- Morphologically sessile (Is), slightly elevated (IIa), flat (IIb), and slightly depressed (IIc) as Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions
- Laterally spreading tumor (granular and nongranular type) as Kudo classification.
You may not qualify if:
- Pedunculated or excavated/ulcerated polyps
- Polyps with features strongly suggestive of submucosal invasive carcinoma
- Polyps in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, familial polyposis, electrolyte abnormality, and coagulopathy
- Residual lesions after endoscopic resection or presence of severe submucosal fibrosis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Joon Seop Lee
Daegu, 41404, South Korea
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 29, 2021
First Posted
April 1, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
March 1, 2022
Study Completion
March 1, 2022
Last Updated
April 1, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share