Diagnostic Errors in Anaphylactic Shock
ANASim
Context-dependent Diagnostic Accuracy in Anaphylactic Shock
1 other identifier
interventional
270
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Diagnostic accuracy and quality of management in anaphylactic shock is assessed in three conditions: expected, unexpected with no distractor, unexpected with distractor
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2008
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedMay 11, 2023
May 1, 2023
14.9 years
March 22, 2021
May 10, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Correct diagnosis of anaphylactic shock
Diagnosis of anaphylactic shock is explicitly stated by at least one team member within a time frame of 15 minutes after onset
15 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Treatment of anaphylactic shock with epinephrine ≥ 0.3mg intravenously
5 minutes
Study Arms (3)
Expected
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnaphylactic shock occurs after the injection of a drug known to cause allergic reactions
Unexpected, no distractor
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnaphylactic shock occurs unexpectedly, but their is no medical distractor
Unexpected, with distractor
ACTIVE COMPARATORAnaphylactic shock occurs unexpectedly. Scenario is set up such, that a tension pneumothorax may be a likely explanation
Interventions
A life-threatening situation occurs in 3 different contexts
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Physicians taking part in voluntary simulator workshops
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal to participate or to being videorecorded
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital
Basel, Canton of Basel-City, 4031, Switzerland
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephan Marsch
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2021
First Posted
April 1, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2008
Primary Completion
November 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
May 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Secondary data can be shared Videorecordings are strictly confidential and cannot be shared