Determinants of the Effectiveness of Robot-assisted Hand Movement Training
2 other identifiers
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators would like to investigate the effectiveness of somatosensory training for robot-assisted hand motor rehabilitation after stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 6, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedOctober 15, 2024
October 1, 2024
3.1 years
March 23, 2021
October 8, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Box and Blocks Test
We compare the change of Box and Block Test scores from baseline evaluation to 1-month post intervention. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.
From baseline to 1-month post intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment of the Upper Extremity
From baseline to 1-month post intervention
Motor Activity Log
From baseline to 1-month post intervention
Changes in finger proprioception measured using the Crisscross Assessment.
From baseline to 1-month post intervention
Study Arms (3)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALParticipants with undergo new FINGER robotic training with no physical assistance 3 times a week for a period of 3 weeks.
Group B
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will undergo new FINGER robotic training with physical assistance 3 times a week for a period of 3 weeks.
Group C
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will undergo new FINGER robotic training with physical assistance and proprioceptive exercises 3 times a week for a period of 3 weeks.
Interventions
New FINGER exoskeleton is a robotic device that can provide assistance and resistance to thumb and finger movement
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 to 85 years
- Suffered from a single ischemic stroke (radiologically confirmed) at least 6-months prior to enrollment
- An ability to score at least 3 blocks on the Box and Block Test
You may not qualify if:
- A substantial decrease in alertness, language reception or attention
- Pregnant or lactating
- Advanced liver, kidney, cardiac or pulmonary disease
- Plan to alter any current participation in other rehabilitation therapy in the time period of the study
- A terminal medical diagnosis consistent with survival \< 1 year
- Coexistent major neurological disease
- Coexistent major psychiatric disease
- A history of significant alcohol or drug abuse in the prior 3 years
- Current enrollment in another study related to stroke or stroke recovery
- Any other medical contraindication to participation in this study evaluated by our team physician.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697, United States
Related Publications (2)
Rowe JB, Chan V, Ingemanson ML, Cramer SC, Wolbrecht ET, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robotic Assistance for Training Finger Movement Using a Hebbian Model: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017 Aug;31(8):769-780. doi: 10.1177/1545968317721975.
PMID: 28803535BACKGROUNDIngemanson ML, Rowe JB, Chan V, Wolbrecht ET, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Use of a robotic device to measure age-related decline in finger proprioception. Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jan;234(1):83-93. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4440-4. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
PMID: 26378004BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Reinkensmeyer, Ph.D
University of California, Irvine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Randomized single-blinded
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2021
First Posted
March 26, 2021
Study Start
May 6, 2022
Primary Completion
May 31, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
October 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share