Enhanced Recovery After Cesarean Section
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Care of Elective Caesarean Section
1 other identifier
observational
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
- 1.Measure compliance of the care of elective caesarean section with ERAS standards
- 2.Measure the quality of recovery of women undergoing elective caesarean section
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Apr 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 25, 2021
March 1, 2021
1 year
March 23, 2021
March 23, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the percentage of compliance of care with ERAS society guidelines
compliance of routinely provided care with ERAS society guidelines
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quality of recovery after elective caesarean section
baseline
Study Arms (2)
First Audit cycle
Second Audit cycle
Eligibility Criteria
women undergoing scheduled and arranged cesarean sections
You may qualify if:
- Women undergoing elective caesarean section in the study period
You may not qualify if:
- Women who cannot apply ERAS protocol
- emergency caesarean section
- anticipated surgical difficulty e.g. placenta previa/accrete, tumors obstructing lower uterine segment
- Severe maternal disease
- severe intraoperative bleeding or visceral injuries necessitating modification of postoperative care
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (7)
Kleiman AM, Chisholm CA, Dixon AJ, Sariosek BM, Thiele RH, Hedrick TL, Carvalho B, Tiouririne M. Evaluation of the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol implementation on maternal outcomes following elective cesarean delivery. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020 Aug;43:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
PMID: 31522935BACKGROUNDMullman L, Hilden P, Goral J, Gwacham N, Tauro C, Spinola K, Rosales K, Collier S, Holmes L, Maccione J, Pitera R, Miller R, Yodice P. Improved Outcomes With an Enhanced Recovery Approach to Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):685-691. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004023.
PMID: 32925620BACKGROUNDTan HS, Habib AS. The optimum management of nausea and vomiting during and after cesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2020 Dec;34(4):735-747. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.04.012. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
PMID: 33288123BACKGROUNDWilson RD, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G. Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):523.e1-523.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.015. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
PMID: 30240657BACKGROUNDCaughey AB, Wood SL, Macones GA, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G, Wilson RD. Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;219(6):533-544. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
PMID: 30118692BACKGROUNDMacones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, Wrench IJ, Huang J, Norman M, Pettersson K, Fawcett WJ, Shalabi MM, Metcalfe A, Gramlich L, Nelson G, Wilson RD. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations (part 3). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):247.e1-247.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Apr 14.
PMID: 30995461BACKGROUNDFrom the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT), European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), European Stroke Organization (ESO), Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI), Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS), and World Stroke Organization (WSO); Sacks D, Baxter B, Campbell BCV, Carpenter JS, Cognard C, Dippel D, Eesa M, Fischer U, Hausegger K, Hirsch JA, Shazam Hussain M, Jansen O, Jayaraman MV, Khalessi AA, Kluck BW, Lavine S, Meyers PM, Ramee S, Rufenacht DA, Schirmer CM, Vorwerk D. Multisociety Consensus Quality Improvement Revised Consensus Statement for Endovascular Therapy of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Int J Stroke. 2018 Aug;13(6):612-632. doi: 10.1177/1747493018778713. Epub 2018 May 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 29786478BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2021
First Posted
March 25, 2021
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
April 1, 2022
Study Completion
October 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03