Comparison of Pantomiming and Easy Onset Treatment

NCT04813588 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: REC/00897 Saba Imtiaz
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 20
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This research will give in-depth understanding of pantomiming and easy onset method as an intervention of stuttering and especially blocking. And by comparing both methods, It will also determine that which method is more effective. This research will also improve the overall awareness regarding stuttering

Conditions

Stammering

Keywords

Pantomiming; Easy onset method; Blocking

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• The real time analysis

  Changes from base line "The Real time analysis will use. It will use to assessed the changes in frequency ,duration types and severity of disfluencies in spontaneous speech.The total number of dysfluencies will be divided by the total number of syllables then multiply answer by 100 .Results between 2% showed normal range,8-15% will consider Moderate level, 12% will consider as severe level

  12 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Pantomimng

EXPERIMENTAL

In experimental group pantomiming treatment will be administered

Other: Pantomiming

Easy onset

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In active comparator group easy onset method will be administered

Other: Easy onset

Interventions

Pantomiming OTHER

Pantomiming with fluency shaping techniques

Pantomimng

Easy onset OTHER

Easy onset method with breathing exercises

Easy onset

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 6 Years - 18 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Participants falling in this category would be added into the study.
• School aged children and adolescents ages between 6 to 18 years(both genders) who stutter with blocking symptoms
• Participant who will be at moderate level of stammering will be included

You may not qualify if:

• Participant failing to fall in this category would be excluded of the study.
• Participants with any other medical condition will be excluded

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Riphah International University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Maryam Nadir Kiyani

Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 43600, Pakistan

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

• Belyk M, Kraft SJ, Brown S. Stuttering as a trait or state - an ALE meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Eur J Neurosci. 2015 Jan;41(2):275-84. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12765. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

  PMID: 25350867 BACKGROUND

• 2. Mundada M, Gawali B, Kayte S. Recognition and classification of speech and its related fluency disorders. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT). 2014;5(5):6764-7.

  BACKGROUND

• 3. Hudock D, Altieri N, Sun L, Bowers A, Keil C, Kalinowski J. The effect of single syllable silent reading and pantomime speech in varied syllable positions on stuttering frequency throughout utterance productions. Speech Communication. 2015 Dec 1;75:76-83.

  BACKGROUND

• 4. Waghmare SD, Deshmukh RR, Shrishrimal PP, Waghmare VB, Janvale GB, Sonawane B. A Comparative Study of Recognition Technique Used for Development of Automatic Stuttered Speech Dysfluency Recognition System. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2017 Jul;10(21):1-4.

  BACKGROUND

• Euler HA, Lange BP, Schroeder S, Neumann K. The effectiveness of stuttering treatments in Germany. J Fluency Disord. 2014 Mar;39:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

  PMID: 24759189 BACKGROUND

• 6. Kordell J. Outcomes of a Combined Mindfulness, Stuttering Modification, and Fluency Shaping Intervention for Children Who Stutter

  BACKGROUND

• 7. Keil CM, Hudock D, Altieri N, Seikel AT. The Effects of Pantomine Speech & Silent Reading in Varied Syllable Positions Throughout a Phrase on Stuttering

  BACKGROUND

• 8. Rifaie NA, Saber AS, El-Din ST, Sallam YA, Algamal AM. Efficacy of the Arabic Modified Fluency Shaping Program in the treatment of stuttering. The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology. 2016 Oct 1;32(4):306.

  BACKGROUND

• 9. Franklin CM. The Effect of Easy Onset Time Treatment on Voice Onset Time in Stuttering.

  BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stuttering

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Speech Disorders; Language Disorders; Communication Disorders; Neurobehavioral Manifestations; Neurologic Manifestations; Nervous System Diseases; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

• Maryam Kiyani, MS/SLP

  Riphah International University

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Imran Amjad, Phd

CONTACT

03324390125; imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Model Details: RCT

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: February 16, 2021
• First Posted: March 24, 2021
• Study Start: March 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: May 1, 2021
• Study Completion: June 1, 2021
• Last Updated: March 24, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

PA (1)