Evaluating the Impact of Incentives on Clinical Trial Participation
1 other identifier
observational
360
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of incentives on clinical trial participation. 1) characterize key stakeholders' views on and assessment of incentives, 2) reach consensus among stakeholders on the factors to be considered when choosing incentives and their relative importance, 3) pilot test using vignettes for incentive decision making. We hypothesize that potential study participants make trade-offs regarding the characteristics of a research study when deciding whether to volunteer. This amendment is to document IRB reliance between UCR and USF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 22, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedMarch 22, 2021
March 1, 2021
2 years
March 2, 2021
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
characterize how people living with HIV assess incentives
we will conduct a 20 question quantitative survey of a nationally representative sample of people living with HIV asking about specific study payment information and scenarios
3 months
characterize key stakeholders' views on and assessment of incentives
focus groups, and key informant interviews will be used to characterize key stakeholders' (people aging with HIV, IRB members, researchers) views on and assessment of incentives, with qualitative analysis of text done using RaDAR. We will use Conjoint Analysis (CJA) to estimate the relative importance (also called "weight") that participants place on each study characteristic when choosing between different hypothetical studies.
3 months
pilot testing vignettes for incentive decision making
We will develop HIV related vignettes (hypothetical scenarios) utilizing the data from outcomes 1 and 2. Specifically, once we have 6 to 8 study characteristics from Aim 2, and the final number of choices (2 - 3) per characteristic, we will use a factorial design to create 25 vignettes (hypothetical scenarios). Individuals from each group (i.e., study participants, researchers, and IRB members) will select the most appropriate incentive from a list of possibilities based on various scenarios. These vignettes will be based on studies identified in the literature and a review of consent forms and created in conjunction with the external advisory board (including pre-testing and revision prior to finalization).
3 months
Interventions
While this is not an intervention, there will be separate participants for the survey study and for the other components of the study (focus groups, interviews, conjoint analysis, piloting the vignettes
Eligibility Criteria
We will recruit patient partners, biomedical HIV researchers and IRB members/bioethicists involved in HIV research and patient partners with HIV co-morbidities (depression, heart disease, arthritis). For the patient populations, we will target men (including MSM) and women aging with HIV, cis and transgender women, and youth (age 18+) of color, but participation will be open to everyone over 18 years of age living with HIV who speaks English and live in the United States.
You may qualify if:
- people living with HIV
- biomedical HIV researchers
- IRB members/bioethicists involved in HIV research
You may not qualify if:
- people under 18 years of age
- people living outside of the United States
- people who do not speak English
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Riversidelead
- University of South Floridacollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UC Riverside
Riverside, California, 92521, United States
Related Publications (1)
Galea JT, Greene KY, Nguyen B, Polonijo AN, Dube K, Taylor J, Christensen C, Zhang Z, Brown B. Evaluating the Impact of Incentives on Clinical Trial Participation: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Community-Engaged Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Nov 23;10(11):e33608. doi: 10.2196/33608.
PMID: 34817381DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2021
First Posted
March 22, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
March 22, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share