The PulsePoint Study
Evaluating the PulsePoint Mobile Device Application to Increase Bystander Resuscitation for Victims of Sudden Cardiac Arrest
1 other identifier
interventional
340
2 countries
2
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether use of the PulsePoint system increases bystander CPR or defibrillator use compared to standard dispatch procedures in patients who suffer non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a public location. Half of all suspected cardiac arrest 9-1-1 calls in a public location will receive PulsePoint alerts (treatment arm). The other half of this eligible patient cohort will receive standard dispatch procedures (control arm).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 19, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 8, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2026
ExpectedApril 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
4.8 years
March 16, 2021
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients receiving bystander resuscitation
Defined as the occurrence of either bystander CPR (chest compressions and or ventilations) or bystander application of a defibrillator prior to the arrival of emergency medical services.
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Proportion of patients receiving bystander CPR (secondary effectiveness outcome)
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes.
Proportion of patients receiving bystander defibrillator use (secondary effectiveness outcome)
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes.
Proportion of patients receiving bystander defibrillator shock delivered (secondary effectiveness outcome)
Patients will be followed for this outcome during the interval from 9-1-1 call to emergency medical services arrival, an expected average of 5 minutes.
Proportion of patients with return of spontaneous circulation (secondary effectiveness outcome)
Patients are followed from EMS arrival on scene until arrival at hospital, an expected average of 35 minutes.
Proportion of patients surviving to hospital discharge (secondary effectiveness outcome)
Patients are followed until death or discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days.
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Emergency Dispatch PLUS PulsePoint notification
EXPERIMENTALEligible 911 calls randomized to the experimental arm of the study will undergo usual dispatch of emergency services personnel as per pre-existing local protocols and activation of the PulsePoint system. When triggered, the system will push location data to all PulsePoint mobile application users within 400 meters of the emergency. Devices receiving the alerts from the PulsePoint system will alarm with auditory, tactile and visual stimuli. The application will present a map showing the exact location of the emergency and the closest public access defibrillator.
Conventional Emergency Dispatch
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to the control arm will receive conventional emergency medical dispatching procedures as per pre-existing local protocols (e.g. dispatch of emergency vehicles, attempted dispatch-assisted CPR) without activation of the PulsePoint system. 911 calls randomized to the control arm will not be associated with any PulsePoint alerts.
Interventions
The PulsePoint interface software monitors each 9-1-1 call on dispatch computers and is automatically triggered by particular conditions including call type (e.g. suspected cardiac arrest) and location type (public location). When triggered, the system pushes location data to all PulsePoint mobile application users within 400 meters of the emergency location. When a mobile device running the PulsePoint Respond application receives the alert data from the PulsePoint system, the device alarms with auditory, tactile (vibration) and visual stimuli. The application presents a map showing the exact location of the suspected cardiac arrest and the closest public access defibrillator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with 911 calls assigned as "suspected" or "confirmed" cardiac arrest and,
- Are confirmed to be EMS-treated, public location out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
You may not qualify if:
- Traumatic cardiac arrest, or
- Cardiac arrests occurring in the context of a dangerous scene as determined by the 9-1-1 call-taker, or
- EMS-witnessed cardiac arrest, or
- Cardiac arrests not treated by EMS ("Do Not Resuscitate", signs of obvious death), or
- Cardiac arrests occurring in nursing homes and health care facilities.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- BC Emergency Health Servicescollaborator
- Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Servicecollaborator
- University of Manitobacollaborator
- University of Torontocollaborator
- Ohio State Universitycollaborator
- Columbus Division of Firecollaborator
- PulsePoint Foundationcollaborator
- Dr. Steven Brookslead
- University of British Columbiacollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Columbus Division of Fire
Columbus, Ohio, 43207, United States
British Columbia Emergency Health Services
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5M 4X6, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Steven C Brooks, MD MHSc
Queen's University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
John M Tallon, MD MSc
University of British Columbia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants, EMS providers, dispatch providers, treating physicians will be blinded
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 16, 2021
First Posted
March 19, 2021
Study Start
June 8, 2021
Primary Completion
March 27, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share