Robotic Cholecystectomy Using the Chinese Micro Hand S Robot: A Controlled, Randomized, Prospective Clinical Study
1 other identifier
interventional
82
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A single-blinded, prospective randomized parallel controlled clinical trial was designed and conducted from December 2019 to November 2020. 82 patients with a gallstone, gallbladder polyp and other benign gallbladder diseases were enrolled in this study. Finally, 82 patients were randomly divided into the Micro Hand S surgical robot group and the da Vinci surgical robot group. Standard robot-assisted transabdominal cholecystectomy was conducted using the Micro Hand S robot or the da Vinci robot. The success rate of operation, assembly time, operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, time to first flatus, postoperative pain, comprehensive complication index, resident time and patient satisfaciton were recorded. The aim of the study is to determine whether the newly developed Chinese Micro Hand S surgical robot results in non-inferiority outcomes in cholecystectomy compared with the prevalent da Vinci robot.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for early_phase_1
Started Dec 2019
Shorter than P25 for early_phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 3, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2021
CompletedMarch 18, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
March 12, 2021
March 16, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Success rate of the surgery
the proportion of patients with successful operation in all participating patients in the experimental or control group
after the study is completed, up to 14 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
assembly time
after the robot is assembled, all data will be collected within 14 months
operation time
after the procedure is completed, all data will be collected within 14 months
blood loss
after the procedure is completed, all data will be collected within 14 months
Time to first flatus
after the intestinal function revival of the patients, all data will be collected within 14 months
The hospital stay
from the admission to the discharge, all data will be collected within 14 months
Study Arms (2)
the Micro Hand S robot group
EXPERIMENTAL41 patients were randomly allocated in the Micro Hand S robot group and cholecystectomy was performed using the Micro Hand S robot.
the da Vinci robot group
OTHER41 patients were randomly allocated in the da Vinci robot group and cholecystectomy was performed using the da Vinci robot.
Interventions
cholecystectomy was performed for patients using the Chinese Micro Hand S surgical robot.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- from 18 to 65 years old;
- patients with acute or chronic cholecystitis, gallstone, gallbladder polyp and other benign gallbladder diseases;
- BMI was 18-30 kg/m2;
- the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was I, II, or III.
You may not qualify if:
- women in pregnancy or lactation;
- A history of epilepsy or mental illness;
- Previous relevant operation history;
- Patients with a severe cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease with New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification III-IV and pulmonary insufficiency who cannot tolerate the operation;
- Liver cirrhosis, kidney failure and other severe liver and kidney dysfunction (ALT and AST exceeded 3 times of the upper limit of normal value, Cr exceeded 1.5 times of the upper limit of normal value).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Qingdao, Shandong, 266003, China
Related Publications (20)
Asad U, Wang CF, Jones MW. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. 2025 Jul 2. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448145/
PMID: 28846328BACKGROUNDAbdel Raheem A, Troya IS, Kim DK, Kim SH, Won PD, Joon PS, Hyun GS, Rha KH. Robot-assisted Fallopian tube transection and anastomosis using the new REVO-I robotic surgical system: feasibility in a chronic porcine model. BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118(4):604-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13517. Epub 2016 May 26.
PMID: 27123543BACKGROUNDAlli VV, Yang J, Xu J, Bates AT, Pryor AD, Talamini MA, Telem DA. Nineteen-year trends in incidence and indications for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the NY State experience. Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1651-1658. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5154-9. Epub 2016 Sep 7.
PMID: 27604366BACKGROUNDBreitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):987-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f.
PMID: 18520226BACKGROUNDCsikesz NG, Singla A, Murphy MM, Tseng JF, Shah SA. Surgeon volume metrics in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci. 2010 Aug;55(8):2398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-1035-6. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
PMID: 19911275BACKGROUNDFanfani F, Monterossi G, Fagotti A, Rossitto C, Gueli Alletti S, Costantini B, Gallotta V, Selvaggi L, Restaino S, Scambia G. The new robotic TELELAP ALF-X in gynecological surgery: single-center experience. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):215-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4187-9. Epub 2015 Apr 4.
PMID: 25840895BACKGROUNDHeemskerk J, van Dam R, van Gemert WG, Beets GL, Greve JW, Jacobs MJ, Bouvy ND. First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci Surgical System in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg. 2005;22(6):426-31. doi: 10.1159/000091445. Epub 2006 Feb 10.
PMID: 16479111BACKGROUNDHuang Y, Chua TC, Maddern GJ, Samra JS. Robotic cholecystectomy versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis. Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):628-636. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.061. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
PMID: 28011011BACKGROUNDLi J, Zhu S, Juan J, Yi B. Preliminary exploration of robotic complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer with the domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive Micro Hand S surgical robot system. Int J Med Robot. 2020 Dec;16(6):1-8. doi: 10.1002/rcs.2148. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32865308BACKGROUNDLuo D, Liu Y, Zhu H, Li X, Gao W, Li X, Zhu S, Yu X. The MicroHand S robotic-assisted versus Da Vinci robotic-assisted radical resection for patients with sigmoid colon cancer: a single-center retrospective study. Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3368-3374. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07107-z. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
PMID: 31482355BACKGROUNDMelling N, Barr J, Schmitz R, Polonski A, Miro J, Ghadban T, Wodack K, Izbicki J, Zani S, Perez D. Robotic cholecystectomy: first experience with the new Senhance robotic system. J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0877-3. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
PMID: 30264180BACKGROUNDMorelli L, Di Franco G, Lorenzoni V, Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Furbetta N, Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Caprili G, Mosca F, Turchetti G, Cuschieri A. Structured cost analysis of robotic TME resection for rectal cancer: a comparison between the da Vinci Si and Xi in a single surgeon's experience. Surg Endosc. 2019 Jun;33(6):1858-1869. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6465-9. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
PMID: 30251144BACKGROUNDRassweiler JJ, Autorino R, Klein J, Mottrie A, Goezen AS, Stolzenburg JU, Rha KH, Schurr M, Kaouk J, Patel V, Dasgupta P, Liatsikos E. Future of robotic surgery in urology. BJU Int. 2017 Dec;120(6):822-841. doi: 10.1111/bju.13851. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
PMID: 28319324BACKGROUNDStrosberg DS, Nguyen MC, Muscarella P 2nd, Narula VK. A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1436-1441. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5134-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
PMID: 27495346BACKGROUNDSu M, Wang J, Li Z, Luo Z, Yuan S, Chen G, Liao Z, He C. [A New Micro-traumatic Laparoscopic Surgery Robot System]. Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi. 2019 May 30;43(3):165-169. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.2019.03.003. Chinese.
PMID: 31184070BACKGROUNDTang CL, Schlich T. Surgical Innovation and the Multiple Meanings of Randomized Controlled Trials: The First RCT on Minimally Invasive Cholecystectomy (1980-2000). J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2017 Apr 1;72(2):117-141. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/jrw027.
PMID: 27667536BACKGROUNDYao Y, Liu Y, Li Z, Yi B, Wang G, Zhu S. Chinese surgical robot micro hand S: A consecutive case series in general surgery. Int J Surg. 2020 Mar;75:55-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
PMID: 31982634BACKGROUNDYi B, Wang G, Li J, Jiang J, Son Z, Su H, Zhu S. The first clinical use of domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system "Micro Hand S". Surg Endosc. 2016 Jun;30(6):2649-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4506-1. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
PMID: 26293795BACKGROUNDYi B, Wang G, Li J, Jiang J, Son Z, Su H, Zhu S, Wang S. Domestically produced Chinese minimally invasive surgical robot system "Micro Hand S" is applied to clinical surgery preliminarily in China. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):487-493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4945-3. Epub 2016 May 18.
PMID: 27194259BACKGROUNDZeng Y, Wang G, Liu Y, Li Z, Yi B, Zhu S. The "Micro Hand S" Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Short-Term Outcomes at a Single Center. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):363-368. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0714. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
PMID: 32013727BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Weidong Guo, MD
The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- single-blind
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor Haitao Niu (The department of Urology)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 12, 2021
First Posted
March 17, 2021
Study Start
December 3, 2019
Primary Completion
November 3, 2020
Study Completion
December 3, 2020
Last Updated
March 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- CSR
- Time Frame
- Case record form of the patients will be shared within six months after the trial complete
Case record form of the patients will be shared within six months after the trial complete