PK/PD Levobupivacaine with and Without Epinephrine After Ultrasound Guided ESP Block
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics for Levobupivacaine with and Without Epinephrine After Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently there is no standardized management or single technique to manage postoperative pain after Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS), there are many options available ranging from intravenous opioids, morphine or fentanyl Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), peripheral nerve blocks, intercostals, paravertebral and epidural blocks. Erector Spinal Block (ESP), this blocks the ventral and dorsal branch of the unilateral thoracic roots. It corresponds to an interfacial block that produces an extensive multidermatomal sensitive block with a single puncture, covering the anterior, lateral and posterior aspect of the thorax. One of its main advantages would be safety, possible less damage to nerves and pneumothorax, as well as the simplicity of execution of this block. What has positioned it as another analgesic alternative in this type of surgery. The pharmacokinetic profile that local anesthetics would have when injected into this interfacial compartment has not yet been described, and what the real impact of the use of vasoconstrictor will be in terms of plasma levels and duration of the block. Our objective is to compare the plasma levels of levobupivacaine achieved after performing an ESP Block with or without epinephrine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_4
Started Apr 2019
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 3, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 11, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 16, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 9, 2022
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
March 1, 2025
2.3 years
March 11, 2021
March 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Plasma levels of levobupivacaine
Levobupivacaine plasma levels will be measured using High-performance liquid chromatography.
5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90 minutes post block.
Changes in plasma levels levobupivacaine of the group I v/s group II
To assess the changes in plasma levels of the group I with epinephrine versus the group II without epinephrine.
5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90 minutes post block.
Sensitive skin extension
Determine the sensitive skin extension of ESP after its performance using pinprick and temperature discrimination using an alcohol swab.
15 minutes post-block
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Pain measured
Every 15 minutes per 2 hours in the PACU and 12 hrs, 24 hrs, 48 hrs during hospitalization
Heart Rate
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
Hemodynamics
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
Pulse oximetry
Every 5 min. Since entering operating room up to end of anesthesia and leaving to recovery room. In average 2 hrs.
Consumption of morphine or its equivalents
During the first 48 hours including intraoperative and postoperative
Study Arms (2)
Group I Epi
EXPERIMENTALThe ESP will be performed under ultrasound vision at T5 level, with the patient seated. Once the ultrasound image is achieved, a 100 mm, 20 G Stimuplex needle will be punctured and a solution of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 ug/ml completing a volume of 20 ml.
Group II no Epi
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe ESP will be performed under ultrasound vision at T5 level, with the patient seated. Once the ultrasound image is achieved, a 100 mm, 20 G Stimuplex needle will be punctured and a solution of levobupivacaine 0.25% without epinephrine completing a volume of 20 ml.
Interventions
The block will be performed under ultrasound vision at T5 level, with the patient seated. Once the ultrasound image is achieved, a 100 mm, 20 G Stimuplex needle will be punctured and a solution of levobupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 5 ug / ml until completing a volume of 20 ml in fractional form.
The block will be performed under ultrasound vision at T5 level, with the patient seated. Once the ultrasound image is achieved, a 100 mm, 20 G Stimuplex needle will be punctured and a solution of levobupivacaine 0.25% without epinephrine 5 ug / ml until completing a volume of 20 ml in fractional form.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Indication of VATS
- ASA I-II
- Body mass index (BMI) 20-34 kg / m2
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with conversion to thoracotomy
- History of chronic pain
- Drug abuse
- Psychiatric illness
- Allergic to some of the drugs used in the study
- Chronic analgesic users
- History of peripheral neuropathy
- Who refuse the procedure
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 450881, Chile
Related Publications (2)
Corvetto MA, Echevarria GC, De La Fuente N, Mosqueira L, Solari S, Altermatt FR. Comparison of plasma concentrations of levobupivacaine with and without epinephrine for transversus abdominis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;37(6):633-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31826c330a.
PMID: 23038415BACKGROUNDAraneda A, De la Cuadra JC, Corvetto M, Balde D, Fuente R, Ibacache M, Contreras V, Solari S, Cortinez I. Pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation for prolonged infusion of levobupivacaine with or without epinephrine in transversus abdominis plane and erector spinae plane blocks: a randomised controlled trial and analysis of pooled data. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Oct;135(4):1051-1058. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2025.05.047. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
PMID: 40640046DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrea Araneda, MD
Clinician
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 11, 2021
First Posted
March 16, 2021
Study Start
April 3, 2019
Primary Completion
August 1, 2021
Study Completion
March 9, 2022
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- After the paper publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers and clinicians related to the analgesic management of patients, upon formal request via e-mail to the research director.
Procedure performance of ESP in terms of duration and user satisfaction