Short Vs Standard Length Myotomy in Achalasia
Outcomes of Short-length vs Standard-length Myotomy Using Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of this randomized controlled trial (non-inferiority study) is to evaluate the outcomes of 4 cm short myotomy compared to the 8 cm standard length myotomy in Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for patients with achalasia. We hypothesize that a shorter myotomy with POEM will have the same clinical efficacy as standard length myotomy based on patient-reported Eckardt score with shorter procedure times and reduced complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 29, 2024
CompletedMarch 15, 2024
March 1, 2024
3.7 years
February 5, 2021
March 14, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare symptomatic improvement of achalasia based on Eckardt Score following POEM with 4 cm myotomy vs 8 cm myotomy
At 1, 6 and 12 months, patient reported outcome of achalasia symptoms will be assessed. The Eckardt Score is a validated research tool for achalasia symptoms. Scores range from 0-12. A higher score indicates worse symptoms. We will compare Eckardt Score pre-POEM and post-PEM at various time points.
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Compare procedure complications after 4 cm myotomy with POEM compared to 8 cm myotomy with POEM
1 year
Compare procedural time and intra-procedural findings between 4 cm myotomy with POEM compared to 8 cm myotomy with POEM
1 year
Compare post-POEM gastro-esophageal reflux between 4 cm myotomy and 8 cm myotomy using GERDQ assessment.
2 years
Study Arms (2)
Standard Length Myotomy
PLACEBO COMPARATORPatients randomized to received 8 cm standard length myotomy in Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for achalasia
Short Length Myotomy
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to received 4 cm standard length myotomy in Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for achalasia
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All patients aged 18+ diagnosed with Type I or Type II achalasia, and patients with EGJ Outflow Obstruction with features of achalasia based on HRM or Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP)
- All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patient with Type III achalasia or spastic esophageal dysmotility disorders requiring long myotomy as determined by HRM
- All patients who are unable or unwilling to give consent will not be included in the study
- Patients who are pregnant, vulnerable populations such as prisoners, life expectancy \< 1 year based on concurrent comorbidities, coagulopathy with INR \> 1.5 that cannot be reversed, thrombocytopenia with platelets \< 50,000 that cannot be corrected with blood products, unable to safely undergo elective endoscopy due to current comorbidities, and inability to pass standard endoscope.
- Patients who have already undergone treatment with POEM or Heller Myotomy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Related Publications (14)
Chen WF, Li QL, Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Xu MD, Zhang YQ, Zhong YS, Ma LL, Qin WZ, Hu JW, Cai MY, He MJ, Cui Z. Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia in pediatric patients: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.06.035. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PMID: 25088923RESULTHungness ES, Sternbach JM, Teitelbaum EN, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Soper NJ. Per-oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) After the Learning Curve: Durable Long-term Results With a Low Complication Rate. Ann Surg. 2016 Sep;264(3):508-17. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001870.
PMID: 27513156RESULTLaurino-Neto RM, Herbella F, Schlottmann F, Patti M. EVALUATION OF ESOPHAGEAL ACHALASIA: FROM SYMPTOMS TO THE CHICAGO CLASSIFICATION. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2018;31(2):e1376. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1376. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
PMID: 29972404RESULTTaft TH, Carlson DA, Triggs J, Craft J, Starkey K, Yadlapati R, Gregory D, Pandolfino JE. Evaluating the reliability and construct validity of the Eckardt symptom score as a measure of achalasia severity. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018 Jun;30(6):e13287. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13287. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
PMID: 29315993RESULTKahrilas PJ, Boeckxstaens G. The spectrum of achalasia: lessons from studies of pathophysiology and high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2013 Nov;145(5):954-65. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.038. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
PMID: 23973923RESULTBoeckxstaens GE, Zaninotto G, Richter JE. Achalasia. Lancet. 2014 Jan 4;383(9911):83-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60651-0. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PMID: 23871090RESULTPandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. 2008 Nov;135(5):1526-33. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.022. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
PMID: 18722376RESULTSpechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001 Jul;49(1):145-51. doi: 10.1136/gut.49.1.145.
PMID: 11413123RESULTPandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ; American Gastroenterological Association. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2005 Jan;128(1):209-24. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.008. No abstract available.
PMID: 15633138RESULTKahrilas PJ, Katzka D, Richter JE. Clinical Practice Update: The Use of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in Achalasia: Expert Review and Best Practice Advice From the AGA Institute. Gastroenterology. 2017 Nov;153(5):1205-1211. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
PMID: 28989059RESULTKahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, Gyawali CP, Roman S, Smout AJ, Pandolfino JE; International High Resolution Manometry Working Group. The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015 Feb;27(2):160-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12477. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
PMID: 25469569RESULTInoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
PMID: 20354937RESULTKane ED, Budhraja V, Desilets DJ, Romanelli JR. Myotomy length informed by high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) results in improved per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) outcomes for type III achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):886-894. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6356-0. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
PMID: 30054739RESULTLi QL, Chen WF, Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Xu MD, Hu JW, Cai MY, Zhang YQ, Qin WZ, Ren Z. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a clinical comparative study of endoscopic full-thickness and circular muscle myotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Sep;217(3):442-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.033. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PMID: 23891074RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2021
First Posted
March 15, 2021
Study Start
June 1, 2020
Primary Completion
February 29, 2024
Study Completion
February 29, 2024
Last Updated
March 15, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share