Effects of Different Methods of PDAC Specimen Acquisition on Primary Cell Culture and Application
Different Methods of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Specimen Acquisition, EUS-FNB vs. Surgery, Influence on Culturing Primary Cells to Screen Sensitive Chemotherapeutics for Individuals: a Prospective Cohort Study
1 other identifier
observational
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the difference in the success rate of culturing primary cells derived from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma specimens of patients which obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy wet suction technique and surgery, analyze whether the sensitive chemotherapeutic agents screened by the primary cells cultured from the specimens obtained by the above two methods are consistent, and whether they are consistent with the clinical treatment effect of patients, verify the accuracy of laboratory drug sensitivity results, so as to provide the basis for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients to choose the source of individual treatment samples.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2022
CompletedMarch 15, 2021
March 1, 2021
11 months
March 1, 2021
March 10, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
The different culture success rate
The difference in the success rate of primary cell culture (P1) and passage to the third generation (P3) between PDAC specimens obtained by EUS-FNB and those obtained by surgery.
About 6 weeks after operation
The representation of the primary cells of pancreatic cancer
Through Western Blot and PCR methods to detect the representativeness of primary cells to the primary tumor. If the patient underwent surgery later, hematoxylin-eosin staining and/or immunohistochemistry were added to compare the histological morphology with the original tumor.
About 8 weeks after operation
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Differences in drug susceptibility results between the two groups
About 14 weeks after operation
Differences of drug sensitivity results between in vitro and clinical drug results
About 22 weeks after operation
Study Arms (2)
EUS-FNB group
Each patient participated in the EUS-FNB group and the surgery group. The procedure of EUS-FNB with wet suction technique is as follow: before the needle was inserted into the biopsy channel, the stylet was removed, and the needle was flushed with saline solution until the fluid dripped out of the needle tip. The air column was replaced with the fluid. A 10-mL syringe was prefilled with 2 mL of saline solution, and the valve was closed. The syringe was loaded to the 5-mL position (i.e. a 3-mL vacuum) and then attached to the proximal port and used for biopsy after inserting into the biopsy channel and puncturing the lesion. Each patient was performed 1-2 passes to obtain specimens for subsequent experiments.
surgery group
Each patient participated in the EUS-FNB group and the surgery group. The patient underwent EUS-FNB with wet suction technique first, followed by surgery (palliative surgery without excising tumor is not included) for pancreatic cancer. According to the size of the specimen, 0.5cm3-1cm3 tumor specimen was used for subsequent experiments.
Interventions
After informed consent, the investigators use two methods to obtain specimens for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, who needs eus-fnb for auxiliary diagnosis and had the opportunity of surgery. One method is EUS-FNB with wet suction technique, the other is surgery (including radical operation and cytoreductive surgery). Both methods are used on the same patient to remove deviations in results caused by tumor heterogeneity.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients who are considered as PDAC by imaging, and may have opportunity of surgery, and require EUS-FNB for definite diagnosis will potentially be included in this study. Informed consent will be given by the doctor in charge or endoscopic operator or researcher. Patients who agree to participate in the trial will sign an informed consent form. Patients were enrolled after being screened according to the eligibility criteria.
You may qualify if:
- Male or female, age≥18
- Imaging examination (US, MRI, CT or PET-CT) of patients confirmed pancreatic lesions, and considered the possibility of PDAC, EUS-FNB was needed for auxiliary diagnosis
- No chemotherapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and palliative chemotherapy, has been performed on patients
- Having surgery opportunities (including radical operation and cytoreductive surgery) and willingness of operation
- Agree to attend this study and signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Poor physical condition, including but not limited to hemoglobin ≤ 8.0g/dl, severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency, etc
- Coagulation dysfunction (platelet count \< 50,000/mm3, international standardized ratio \> 1.5), or inability to discontinue anticoagulation therapy
- High risk for deep sedation
- Acute pancreatitis in the previous 2 weeks
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Any diseases leading to unreliable follow-up
- Absence of informed consent
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China
Biospecimen
The investigators use two methods (EUS-FNB and surgery) to obtain pancreatic cancer specimens from patients.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiaoyan Wang, M.D.
The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2021
First Posted
March 15, 2021
Study Start
January 15, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2021
Study Completion
February 28, 2022
Last Updated
March 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share