NCT04792307

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators will use feasibility RCT design to determine whether it is justifiable to conduct a large-scale clinical trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation with or without additional protein supplementation in hospitalised patients who are temporarily immobilised following a fragility fracture. Muscle thickness, muscle strength, patients' mobility and self-care will be assessed at baseline and after 6-wk trial duration or until patients discharged from hospital. Outcomes will include participants' recruitment rate, tolerability and accessibility and their characteristics.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
66

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 9, 2021

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2021

Completed
22 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 30, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

February 9, 2021

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Frailty,ImmobilityElectrical StimulationHigh protein

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Lower limb muscle strength

    using A hand-held dynamometer for both vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles

    "Change from Baseline lower limb muscle strength at 6 weeks"

  • Hand grip strength

    using a standard device

    "Change from Baseline Hand grip strength at 6 weeks"

  • Ultrasound

    Ultrasound parameters of vastus lateralis and tibialis anterior muscles (thickness, pennation angle, echogenicity).

    "Change from Baseline lower limb muscle thickness at 6 weeks"

  • iEMG derived motor unit structure and function

    intramuscular electromyography (iEMG) measures of muscle control

    "Change from Baseline lower limb muscle control at 6 weeks"

  • Elderly Mobility Scale

    measuring 9 domains from very fit 1 to terminally ill 9

    "Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks"and " 6 months"

  • Nottingham Extended ADL

    The Answers to the questions should be given whenever possible by the person who is the subject of the questionnaire Answers should be recorded by ticking one box for each question

    "Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks"and " 6 months"

  • Disability and functional independence using Barthel ADL score.

    an ordinal scale used to measure performance in activities of daily living (ADL). variables describing ADL and mobility are scored, a higher number being a reflection of greater ability to function independently following hospital discharge.

    Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks "and " 6 months"]

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Tolerability measurement

    "up to 6 weeks"

  • Pain/Visual analogue scores

    "Change from Baseline functional independence at 6 weeks "

  • Mortality Rate

    At 6 months after recruitment

  • Number of protein supplementation doses consumed

    "up to 6 weeks"

  • Acceptability verbal questionnaire of Neuromuscular stimulation

    "up to 6 weeks"

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to one leg

OTHER

* NMES left leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation * NMES right leg, no high protein ice cream supplementation

Other: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation , no high protein ice cream supplementation

High protein ice cream supplementation

OTHER

* NMES left leg, high protein ice cream supplementation * NMES right leg, high protein ice cream supplementation

Other: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation , no high protein ice cream supplementation

Interventions

A trained operator applies Neuromuscular electrical stimulation treatment to one leg, for approximately 30 minutes per session, three sessions per week with or without high protein ice cream. Treatment can stimulate the nerve controlling the vastus lateralis muscle in the thigh or the nerve controlling the tibialis anterior muscle in the lower leg, or both. In our study, we will aim to stimulate both nerves and muscle groups, on the basis that the maximal effect with result from the maximal amount of muscle stimulated.Treatment is adjusted to generate a specific force and maintained for up to 5 minutes, followed by a rest period and then repeated three times over the typical 30-minute session. The stimulation can vary according to the frequency (pulses per second, typically 10-50Hz). Additional protein supplementation: high protein ice cream :a single doses of a high protein supplement after each bout of neuromuscular electrical stimulation,

Also known as: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation with high protein ice cream supplementation
High protein ice cream supplementationNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to one leg

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \>/=65 years
  • Hospitalised due to incident fragility fracture (hip, spine, pelvis, rib, upper limb, lower limb)
  • Immobile 72 hours after admission or completion of surgery whichever is the later.
  • Predicted date of discharge \>/= 7 days after recruitment

You may not qualify if:

  • Unable to give valid informed consent
  • Residence outside catchment area of hospital (likely to be moved during the study period)
  • Unable to communicate in English sufficiently to participate in neuromuscular electrical stimulation.
  • Implanted medical device (e.g. pacemaker)
  • Any other contraindications to neuromuscular electrical stimulation (e.g. injury to the stimulation sites)
  • Leg amputation or any pre-injury conditions affecting a leg unilaterally such as hemiparesis
  • Dysphagia for liquids
  • Protein supplementation clinically indicated and prescribed
  • End stage renal failure
  • Obesity (BMI\>30)
  • End of life, for any reason
  • Any other clinical reason why rehabilitation is not clinically indicated
  • Within 10 days of being symptom free having been COVID-19 positive (PCR testing or clinical criteria), or other barrier nursed patients
  • Lactose intolerance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (19)

  • Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M; Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019 Jan 1;48(1):16-31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169.

    PMID: 30312372BACKGROUND
  • Wilkinson DJ, Piasecki M, Atherton PJ. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: Measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Nov;47:123-132. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 23.

    PMID: 30048806BACKGROUND
  • Rudrappa SS, Wilkinson DJ, Greenhaff PL, Smith K, Idris I, Atherton PJ. Human Skeletal Muscle Disuse Atrophy: Effects on Muscle Protein Synthesis, Breakdown, and Insulin Resistance-A Qualitative Review. Front Physiol. 2016 Aug 25;7:361. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00361. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27610086BACKGROUND
  • Anthony K, Robinson K, Logan P, Gordon AL, Harwood RH, Masud T. Chair-based exercises for frail older people: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:309506. doi: 10.1155/2013/309506. Epub 2013 Sep 9.

    PMID: 24089670BACKGROUND
  • Welch C, Majid Z, Greig C, Gladman J, Masud T, Jackson T. Interventions to ameliorate reductions in muscle quantity and function in hospitalised older adults: a systematic review towards acute sarcopenia treatment. Age Ageing. 2021 Feb 26;50(2):394-404. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa209.

    PMID: 33098419BACKGROUND
  • Dacombe PJ, Clement RGE, Woodard J, Sahota O. Poor nutritional intake in acute fractured neck of femur admission - is this well described clinical problem still under-managed? International Journal of Surgery (Abtracts) 2010 : 8 ; 501-578

    BACKGROUND
  • Jones S, Man WD, Gao W, Higginson IJ, Wilcock A, Maddocks M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for muscle weakness in adults with advanced disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD009419. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009419.pub3.

    PMID: 27748503BACKGROUND
  • Symons TB, Sheffield-Moore M, Wolfe RR, Paddon-Jones D. A moderate serving of high-quality protein maximally stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in young and elderly subjects. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Sep;109(9):1582-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.06.369.

    PMID: 19699838BACKGROUND
  • Martin HJ, Yule V, Syddall HE, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Aihie Sayer A. Is hand-held dynamometry useful for the measurement of quadriceps strength in older people? A comparison with the gold standard Bodex dynamometry. Gerontology. 2006;52(3):154-9. doi: 10.1159/000091824.

    PMID: 16645295BACKGROUND
  • Lunt E, Ong T, Gordon AL, Greenhaff PL, Gladman JRF. The clinical usefulness of muscle mass and strength measures in older people: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2021 Jan 8;50(1):88-95. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afaa123.

    PMID: 32706848BACKGROUND
  • Tarquinio C, Kivits J, Minary L, Coste J, Alla F. Evaluating complex interventions: perspectives and issues for health behaviour change interventions. Psychol Health. 2015 Jan;30(1):35-51. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2014.953530. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

    PMID: 25140439BACKGROUND
  • Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud. 1988;10(2):61-3. doi: 10.3109/09638288809164103.

    PMID: 3403500BACKGROUND
  • Gladman JR, Lincoln NB, Adams SA. Use of the extended ADL scale with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1993 Nov;22(6):419-24. doi: 10.1093/ageing/22.6.419.

    PMID: 8310887BACKGROUND
  • Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, Mitnitski A. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005 Aug 30;173(5):489-95. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.050051.

    PMID: 16129869BACKGROUND
  • Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.

    PMID: 15817019BACKGROUND
  • Stratton RJ, Hackston A, Longmore D, Dixon R, Price S, Stroud M, King C, Elia M. Malnutrition in hospital outpatients and inpatients: prevalence, concurrent validity and ease of use of the 'malnutrition universal screening tool' ('MUST') for adults. Br J Nutr. 2004 Nov;92(5):799-808. doi: 10.1079/bjn20041258.

    PMID: 15533269BACKGROUND
  • Laufer Y, Shtraker H, Elboim Gabyzon M. The effects of exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in subjects with knee osteoarthritis: a 3-month follow-up study. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jul 17;9:1153-61. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S64104. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25083133BACKGROUND
  • Asakawa Y, Jung JH, Koh SE. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves strength, pain and weight distribution on patients with knee instability post surgery. Physical therapy rehabilitation science. 2014;3(2):112-8.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chen RC, Li XY, Guan LL, Guo BP, Wu WL, Zhou ZQ, Huo YT, Chen X, Zhou LQ. Effectiveness of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for the rehabilitation of moderate-to-severe COPD: a meta-analysis. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 28;11:2965-2975. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S120555. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 27932876BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SarcopeniaFrailty

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Muscular AtrophyNeuromuscular ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesAtrophyPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and SymptomsPathologic Processes

Study Officials

  • Maria Kofali

    Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: will randomly allocate participants offering half of them additional protein supplementation over and above their ordinary diet
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2021

First Posted

March 10, 2021

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

March 30, 2022

Study Completion

June 30, 2022

Last Updated

March 10, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

individual participant data (IPD) available only to those involved in the research project