Multicenter Analysis of Efficacy and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Photopheresis as Treatment of Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction
1 other identifier
observational
800
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Lung transplantation is an established therapy for end-stage lung disease such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis and pulmonary hypertension. However, Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction (CLAD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors. The 5-year survival rate is reported to be 50%, which is considerably inferior compared to other solid organ transplantation. In addition, the financial burden of CLAD (around 80.000 euro/year for a patient with CLAD) is considerable. No curative therapy is available yet. To date, the two most effective treatment are azithromycin and extracorporeal photopheresis. Azithromycin is used as first-line treatment and it is effective in stopping FEV1 decline, however its effects are only limited to a set of patients. ECP can be used as second-line treatment in patients unresponsive to azithromycin. ECP has been firstly developed for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and later used in a variety of other indications including solid organ transplantation. The process starts with leukapheresis, followed by incubation of the isolated cells with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and subsequent activation of 8-MOP with ultraviolet A radiation. At the end, the cells are reinfused into the patient. 8-MOP is a biologically inert substance, but in the presence of UVA light it cross-links DNA by forming covalent bonds with pyrimidine bases and causes apoptosis. ECP is effective in the palliative treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma but its effectiveness was also shown in several other T-cell-mediated diseases, particularly in the treatment and prevention of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease. In depth knowledge on the mechanisms whereby ECP manipulates the immune system are still unclear. Most of the experimental studies have been performed in murine models of GvHD. Apoptotic cells isolated during ECP treatment have the potential to induce IL-10 secretion, reduce dendritic cells activation and increase percentage of Tregs. In addition, ECP reduces the production of IL-6 and TNF-α and increases TGF-β production. In lung transplantation, ECP treatment is used as second-line treatment of CLAD and it has the potential to stabilize lung function decline and to improve long-term graft. According to the published literature, however, approximately 30 to 40% of treated recipients did not profit from ECP. Greer and colleagues found that RAS patients as well as rapid lung function decliners showed lower rate of response and worse long-term outcomes. On the contrary in a more recent analysis only BOS diagnosis was associated with better outcomes. A single prospective interventional study was published by our group and it confirmed results from other previous retrospective analysis. Up to now, no clear predictors for response have been identified yet.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2005
Longer than P75 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 25, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedMarch 10, 2021
March 1, 2021
17 years
February 25, 2021
March 9, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Percentage change in FEV1 within 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
change in maximal expiratory flow (50%) at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
3 months
Change in forced expiratory value in 1 second/dorced vital capacity ratio at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
3 months
Change in total lung capacity at 3 months after start of extracorporeal photopheresis
3 months
Patients' survival
Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
Graft survival
Within 5 years from start of extracorporeal photopheresis
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction
Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction, who underwent extracorporeal photopheresis
Interventions
ECP can be used as second-line treatment in patients unresponsive to azithromycin. ECP has been firstly developed for treatment of cutaneous T cell lymphomas and later used in a variety of other indications including solid organ transplantation. The process starts with leukapheresis, followed by incubation of the isolated cells with 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) and subsequent activation of 8-MOP with ultraviolet A radiation. At the end, the cells are reinfused into the patient. 8-MOP is a biologically inert substance, but in the presence of UVA light it cross-links DNA by forming covalent bonds with pyrimidine bases and causes apoptosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Lung transplant recipients with chronic lung allograft dysfunction who received extracorporeal photopheresis as treatment
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of CLAD Adult transplant recipients (\>18 years)
You may not qualify if:
- ECP for other diagnosis Recipients of multi-organ transplantation Recipients of single lung transplantation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 25, 2021
First Posted
March 10, 2021
Study Start
January 1, 2005
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
March 10, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03