NCT04791111

Brief Summary

Overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) is very frequent and increase with age. Antimuscarinics allows improvement for OAB symptoms, quality of life and urodynamic parameters. However, antimuscarinics adherence is poor and anticholinergic drugs are often withdrawn few months after their introduction. This low adherence to antimuscarinics can be explained by side effects as dry mouth, blurred vision, constipation or cognitive impairment which are due to systemic anticholinergic effects since specificity and receptor affinity of bladder antimuscarinics are poor with a large distribution of acetylcholine receptors in all the body. Unfortunately, there is no questionnaires which evaluate side effects or constraints. The objective of the study is to develop and validate a new questionnaire to assess side effects of antimuscarinic treatment in a patient with OAB. The study was conducted in a Neuro-urology Department of a University Hospital. To allow a full psychometric validation of the questionnaire, the study protocol included 3 steps: qualitative interviews, feasibility study and validation study. The inclusion criteria were to be aged \> 18 years and to have OAB symptoms according to the ICS definition and secondary to a neurogenic dysfunction. First step of the study consisted in a review literature on Pubmed to explore the different side effects secondary to antimuscarinic treatment and do determine which tools were available. In addition, we conducted semi-structured interviews on 30 patients suffering from OAB. For this feasibility study, 30 patients were included. They had to rate each item to evaluate comprehension, acceptation and pertinence with a three-points Likert scale from response "0: not at all or quite" to "2: perfectly". Validation study: 100 patients Content validity was assessed by the panel of experts. Internal consistency reliability was calculated using the α coefficient of Cronbach. Each response has been transformed in a numeric value to perform this test. Alpha coefficient of Cronbach was considered as very good if \> 0.7. Test-retest reliability was tested using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) which was significant over 0.7. Objective was to validate this questionnaire with good or very good psychometric properties. Primary outcome was Alpha coefficient of Cronbach and ICC ≥ 0,7.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2020

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2020

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 5, 2021

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2021

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 4, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 5, 2021

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

toolside effectsquestionnaireneurogenic bladder

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • reproductibilty of Anticholinergic side effects QuestionnAire (AQUA)

    Patients were asked to answer a second time the questionnaire with a second evaluation at 14 days after the first one. The "intra-class correlation coefficient" (ICC) was used to detemrine if this evaluaiton could lead to similar result for each quesiton. An ICC\>0.70 was necessary to define reproductibility.

    1 day

  • Acceptatbility of AQUA

    Each patient was asked to rate acceptatibilty of the questionnaire with a four-point liket scale (A: perfect, B : good, C: Average, D: bad) regarding acceptance of the questions

    1 day

  • Comprehension of AQUA

    Each patient was asked to rate comprehension of the questionnaire with a four-point liket scale (A: perfect, B : good, C: Average, D: bad) regarding comprehension of the questions

    1 day

Interventions

validated questionnaire to assess side effects secondary to antimuscarinics treatment in neurogenic bladder

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patient suffering from OAB symptoms secondary to neurogenic condition and treated by antimuscarinic treatment.

You may qualify if:

  • OAB symptoms according to ICS definition
  • neurogenic bladder
  • antimuscarinic treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Treatment change between first evaluation and second evaluation (Test retest validity)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

department of Neuro-Urology, Hôpital Tenon

Paris, 70020, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder, OveractiveUrinary Bladder, Neurogenic

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesMale Urogenital DiseasesLower Urinary Tract SymptomsUrological ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Gérard AMARENCO, MD, PhD

    Sorbonne University, GRC 001, GREEN, APHP, Hopital Tenon, France

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Clinical professor, Head of neuro urology department, APHP, tenon Hospital, Paris, France

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2021

First Posted

March 10, 2021

Study Start

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion

June 30, 2021

Study Completion

August 31, 2021

Last Updated

March 4, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Locations