Study Stopped
No enrollments
Clinical Impact of Rapid Prototyping 3D Models for Surgical Management
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Patient-specific, 3D printed models have been utilized in preoperative planning for many years. Among researchers and clinicians, there is a perception that preoperative exposure to 3D printed models, derived from patient images (CT or MRI), aid in procedural planning. 3D printed models for heart surgery have the potential to improve a clinician's preparedness and therefore may reduce surgically-related morbidity and mortality. This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate whether pre-procedural planning of surgeons exposed to a patient-specific 3D printed heart model will decrease cardiopulmonary bypass time, morbidity, and mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started May 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 9, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 9, 2021
March 1, 2021
3.9 years
August 29, 2017
March 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time under cardiopulmonary bypass
peri-operative
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Mortality
Up to 30 days post-operative
Intraoperative death or intraprocedural death
peri-operative
Unexpected Cardiac arrest during or following procedure
From surgical date through 30 days post-operative
Bleeding, Requiring reoperation
From surgical date through 30 days post-operative
Sternum left open, Unplanned
From surgical date through 30 days post-operative
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONStandard of care (not involving 3D printing)
3D Model
EXPERIMENTAL3D printed models (at least one rigid blood volume model and one flexible shell model) will be used for surgical planning.
Interventions
Prior to surgical intervention, the surgeon will be exposed to clinically-indicated images and a patient-specific 3D printed model of the subject's heart anatomy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pediatric subjects undergoing primary complex two-ventricle repair of congenital heart defect, including but not limited to:
- double outlet right ventricle (DORV),
- transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis (TGA/VSD/PS),
- truncus arteriosus with ventricular septal defect (TA/VSD)
- congenitally corrected transposition of the arteries with pulmonary stenosis (CCTGA/PS).
- Patient who will undergo preoperative cardiac MR or cardiac CT imaging
- Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) and HIPAA authorization obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Complex defects involving atrioventricular valve anomalies
- complete or transitional atrioventricular canal
- double inlet left ventricle
- tricuspid atresia
- mitral atresia
- Defects with valve dysfunction requiring an extensive valvuloplasty
- Patients with a contraindication to MRI scanning will be excluded unless they are referred for a cardiac CT per clinical standard of practice. These contraindications include patients with the following devices:
- Central nervous system aneurysm clips
- Implanted neural stimulator
- Implanted cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator which are not MR safe or MR conditional according to the manufacturer
- Cochlear implant
- Ocular foreign body (e.g. metal shavings)
- Implanted Insulin pump
- Metal shrapnel or bullet.
- Any contraindications to receiving IV gadolinium contrast, determined clinically
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Children's National Research Institutelead
- Phoenix Children's Hospitalcollaborator
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphiacollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Related Publications (24)
Cardoen B, Demeulemeester E, Beliën J. Operating room planning and scheduling: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research 201(3): 921-932, 2010.
BACKGROUNDCostello JP, Olivieri LJ, Krieger A, Thabit O, Marshall MB, Yoo SJ, Kim PC, Jonas RA, Nath DS. Utilizing Three-Dimensional Printing Technology to Assess the Feasibility of High-Fidelity Synthetic Ventricular Septal Defect Models for Simulation in Medical Education. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2014 Jul;5(3):421-6. doi: 10.1177/2150135114528721.
PMID: 24958045BACKGROUNDCostello JP, Olivieri LJ, Su L, Krieger A, Alfares F, Thabit O, Marshall MB, Yoo SJ, Kim PC, Jonas RA, Nath DS. Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015 Mar-Apr;10(2):185-90. doi: 10.1111/chd.12238. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
PMID: 25385353BACKGROUNDCui X, Boland T, D'Lima DD, Lotz MK. Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul. 2012 Aug;6(2):149-55. doi: 10.2174/187221112800672949.
PMID: 22436025BACKGROUNDDavis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science 35(8): 982-1003, 1989.
BACKGROUNDDexter F, Macario A. Changing allocations of operating room time from a system based on historical utilization to one where the aim is to schedule as many surgical cases as possible. Anesth Analg. 2002 May;94(5):1272-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200205000-00042.
PMID: 11973204BACKGROUNDDoes RJMM, Vermaat TMB, Verver JPS, Bisgaard S, Van Den Heuvel J. Reducing Start Time Delays in Operating Rooms. Journal of Quality Technology 41(1): 95-109, 2009.
BACKGROUNDEjaz F, Ryan J, Henriksen M, Stomski L, Feith M, Osborn M, Pophal S, Richardson R, Frakes D. Color-coded patient-specific physical models of congenital heart disease. Rapid Prototyping Journal 20(4): 336-343, 2014.
BACKGROUNDGelijns AC, Moskowitz AJ, Acker MA, Argenziano M, Geller NL, Puskas JD, Perrault LP, Smith PK, Kron IL, Michler RE, Miller MA, Gardner TJ, Ascheim DD, Ailawadi G, Lackner P, Goldsmith LA, Robichaud S, Miller RA, Rose EA, Ferguson TB Jr, Horvath KA, Moquete EG, Parides MK, Bagiella E, O'Gara PT, Blackstone EH; Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN). Management practices and major infections after cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 29;64(4):372-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.052.
PMID: 25060372BACKGROUNDHu A, Wilson T, Ladak H, Haase P, Doyle P, Fung K. Evaluation of a three-dimensional educational computer model of the larynx: voicing a new direction. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Jun;39(3):315-22.
PMID: 20470679BACKGROUNDKim MS, Hansgen AR, Wink O, Quaife RA, Carroll JD. Rapid prototyping: a new tool in understanding and treating structural heart disease. Circulation. 2008 May 6;117(18):2388-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740977.
PMID: 18458180BACKGROUNDKing WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43(6): 740-755, 2006.
BACKGROUNDKutty S, Graney BA, Khoo NS, Li L, Polak A, Gribben P, Hammel JM, Smallhorn JF, Danford DA. Serial assessment of right ventricular volume and function in surgically palliated hypoplastic left heart syndrome using real-time transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jun;25(6):682-9. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2012.02.008. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PMID: 22421029BACKGROUNDLang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, Adams DH, Agricola E, Buck T, Faletra FF, Franke A, Hung J, de Isla LP, Kamp O, Kasprzak JD, Lancellotti P, Marwick TH, McCulloch ML, Monaghan MJ, Nihoyannopoulos P, Pandian NG, Pellikka PA, Pepi M, Roberson DA, Shernan SK, Shirali GS, Sugeng L, Ten Cate FJ, Vannan MA, Zamorano JL, Zoghbi WA; American Society of Echocardiography; European Association of Echocardiography. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012 Jan;25(1):3-46. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.11.010. No abstract available.
PMID: 22183020BACKGROUNDMavroudis C, Backer C, Idriss RF. Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, 4 edition. Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
BACKGROUNDMoreno Cegarra JL, Cegarra Navarro JG, Córdoba Pachón JR. Applying the technology acceptance model to a Spanish City Hall. International Journal of Information Management 34(4): 437-445, 2014.
BACKGROUNDMottl-Link S, Hubler M, Kuhne T, Rietdorf U, Krueger JJ, Schnackenburg B, De Simone R, Berger F, Juraszek A, Meinzer HP, Karck M, Hetzer R, Wolf I. Physical models aiding in complex congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Jul;86(1):273-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.06.001.
PMID: 18573436BACKGROUNDO'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979 Sep;35(3):549-56.
PMID: 497341BACKGROUNDOlivieri L, Krieger A, Chen MY, Kim P, Kanter JP. 3D heart model guides complex stent angioplasty of pulmonary venous baffle obstruction in a Mustard repair of D-TGA. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Mar 15;172(2):e297-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.12.192. Epub 2014 Jan 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 24447757BACKGROUNDRyan JR, Moe TG, Richardson R, Frakes DH, Nigro JJ, Pophal S. A novel approach to neonatal management of tetralogy of Fallot, with pulmonary atresia, and multiple aortopulmonary collaterals. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Jan;8(1):103-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.04.030. Epub 2014 Nov 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 25457761BACKGROUNDSodian R, Weber S, Markert M, Rassoulian D, Kaczmarek I, Lueth TC, Reichart B, Daebritz S. Stereolithographic models for surgical planning in congenital heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 May;83(5):1854-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2006.12.004.
PMID: 17462413BACKGROUNDWeidenbach M, Razek V, Wild F, Khambadkone S, Berlage T, Janousek J, Marek J. Simulation of congenital heart defects: a novel way of training in echocardiography. Heart. 2009 Apr;95(8):636-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.156919. Epub 2009 Jan 8.
PMID: 19131439BACKGROUNDWypij D, Newburger JW, Rappaport LA, duPlessis AJ, Jonas RA, Wernovsky G, Lin M, Bellinger DC. The effect of duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in infant heart surgery on late neurodevelopment: the Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Nov;126(5):1397-403. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(03)00940-1.
PMID: 14666011BACKGROUNDYarbrough AK, Smith TB. Technology acceptance among physicians: a new take on TAM. Med Care Res Rev. 2007 Dec;64(6):650-72. doi: 10.1177/1077558707305942. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
PMID: 17717378BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laura Olivieri, MD
Children's National Research Institute
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Stephen Pophal, MD
Phoenix Children's Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Yoav Dori, MD
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Cardiologist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2017
First Posted
March 9, 2021
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
June 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 9, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share