Surgical Fixation and Non-Operative Management Outcomes in Proximal Humerus Fractures
Comparison of Surgical Fixation and Non-Operative Management Outcomes in Proximal Humerus Fractures
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The management of proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) remains a significant challenge in orthopaedics. The acute treatment options for PHFs are numerous and are typically guided by the fracture pattern and functional demands of the patients. The most commonly used methods include non-operative management with a sling or surgical fixation. Although non-surgical treatment is a reasonable treatment option for the majority of humerus fractures, there is an increasing interest in surgical intervention. There are no evidence-based treatment recommendations, thus permitting large local variation in treatment preferences. There are a number of studies in the literature about how outcome measures of the patients after PHFs management change, but these results generally compare functional results before and after treatment. Misra et al. stated that conservatively managed patients with PHFs have more pain and a poorer range of motion than those managed by either fixation or arthroplasty, while cochrane review stated that surgery is not superior to nonsurgical treatment in most proximal humerus fractures. Jayakumar et al. determined that kinesiophobia is one of the strongest predictors of functional limitation and recovery from a PHF is enhanced by overcoming fears of movement or reinjury within a week after injury. There is no clear knowledge regarding how the surgical or conservative management used in the management of PHF affects the early results of assessment parameters. The aim of this study was to compare early results of surgical fixation versus non-operative management outcomes in patients with proximal humerus fractures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 3, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 12, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 12, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2023
CompletedJuly 19, 2023
July 1, 2023
2.2 years
March 3, 2021
July 17, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Kinesiophobia
Tampa kinesiophobia scale will be used for determining of kinesiophobia or fear of movement.The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia is a 17 item questionnaire used to assess the subjective rating of kinesiophobia or fear of movement. The score varies between 17 and high scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia.
Baseline
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Shoulder Pain
Baseline
Range of Motion
Baseline
Functional Status
Baseline
Quality of Life of the patients
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Surgical Fixation Group
Open reduction with deltopectoral incision and humeral osteosynthesis with anatomic plates and screws will be performed for surgical fixation.
Non-Operative Group
Non-surgical treatment will be performed with sling immobilization.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with proximal humerus fracture who come to the orthopedic clinic.
You may qualify if:
- Stabilization after proximal humerus fracture with surgical fixation (post-op 3-6 weeks) or non-surgical treatment with sling immobilization (callus formation on radiography).
- Volunteer
You may not qualify if:
- Malunion tubercle majus,
- Advanced osteoporosis,
- Avascular necrosis of the humeral head,
- Presence of neurological and rheumatologic disease,
- Recurrent infection and open wound-incision in the region,
- Communication problems
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ayşe Alpözgen
Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ayse Zengin Alpozgen, PhD
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 3, 2021
First Posted
March 8, 2021
Study Start
March 12, 2021
Primary Completion
May 12, 2023
Study Completion
May 15, 2023
Last Updated
July 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07